@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3



Comments:

<0> np
<0> asa arata la mine:
<0> PATH=C:\Perl\bin\;C:\WINDOWS\system32;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\PRO
<0> GRA~1\COMMON~1\Adobe\AGL
<0> si cand scriu: perl blabla.pl
<0> il gaseste automat
<0> anyway brb
<1> merci
<2> can i run vista on a via c7 system
<3> hi there
<3> any onw can help me ?
<4> I know on windows xp pro if I demote the local users to 'User' level only, then the administrator account shows up on the welcome menu. Is this the same behaviour on Home?
<4> Is there any restriction in XP Home from me using the Administrator account normally (like CTRL-Alt-Del twice from the Welcome screen?)
<5> not that i know of
<6> you cannot access the administrator account useing ctrl-alt-del at the welcome screen in home .. for the administrators account in home you must boot to safe mode
<4> PurpleCow AHHHH!



<4> Arg
<4> PurpleCow Is there any way to hack it (without violating the EULA, of course).
<6> none I know of but never looked either
<0> hack what ?
<0> sorry, didn't got the discussion from the start
<4> Skello the home box won't let me log in as Administrator from the Normal Welcome screen.
<4> Yeah
<4> I missed a good part of life before I was born, too.
<0> ah you can enable that
<4> Skello Everything I've found, sofar, on google usenet, has parroted the microsoft line, 'you must be in safe mode to use the administrator account'.
<4> Skello I normally make the local user a 'restricted user' on an XP Pro box, which makes the Administrator account appear on the Welcome screen, and all is good. Apparently there is some kind of policy restriction on Home. I've used GPEDIT before, and it's not present on XP Home.
<4> Skello How so?
<0> ah XP HOME
<0> hold on a sec
<4> Skello it looks like a policy restriction, something easy to change in w2k, xp pro, etc.
<0> Stew2 try this
<4> Yeah?
<0> Start > Run: REG ADD "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ Winlogon\SpecialAccounts\UserList" /v Administrator /t REG_DWORD /d 1 /f
<0> then do switch user
<0> to get the welcomes screen
<0> see if it appears
<4> I think I know what you are at.
<4> The user is busy using their laptop now. I can't try it at present.
<4> They are in sweden and I'm in berlin.
<4> Anyway....
<4> This mod just makes it appear, it doesn't look like it removes the account restriction.
<0> you mean it makes it appear but still doesn't let you logon to it
<0> ?
<4> It's a common enough question.
<4> Well, I am aware the SpecialAccounts modification makes the Administrator account appear.
<4> So I know what tree you're barking up.
<4> For instance, ctrl-alt-del twice gives me the cl***ic login screen. However, trying to log in as administrator gives the 'This account cannot be used due to ... restrictions'.
<0> ah right
<0> i don't think there's a way to byp*** that
<7> u can just byp*** if u have admin rights ;p
<7> and dat wouldnt be byp*** ;p
<7> bbs
<4> O
<0> Microsoft sais that this behavior is by design
<0> so i doubt you can change it
<4> Skello, 'by design'. I wonder, since the binaries are the same.
<0> yeah but if you think about it, if it would be otherwise the answer should be pretty easy to find
<0> someone could have find a solution all these years
<0> and by now it should be commonly spread on help websites
<0> and as you said it's a commonly asked question
<4> Exactly.
<4> Thanks.
<4> First time I've seen or had the problem. People getting these laptops with Home preinstalled.
<0> well why would you want to log in as Administrator in normal mode
<0> ?
<4> Skello Runas.
<4> Login as restricted user, and runas to do admin functions.
<4> Can't do it, I think it's also restricted.
<0> well first user you create automaticaly gets administrator credetials
<0> and you can name it whatever
<0> then you can create a restricted one
<0> then remove this first user from the group that makes it show on the logon screen
<0> or logon remotely or whatever
<0> then use the secondary user
<0> and use RunAs as the first user
<0> which you can name Admin



<0> or something
<0> if that's not prohibitted
<0> i think there are some names that you can't use
<0> but be creative, name it MACHINE, SERVICES
<0> or whatever
<0> what do you think Stew2 ? would that solve your problem ?
<4> Skello Yeah. That's basically what I did originally. Except Add/Remove programs wasn't working correctly.
<4> I guess i have no choice but to do it again.
<4> Seems stupid. Oh well.
<4> thanks.
<0> don't mention it, always a pleasure
<4> Is windows 2k to windows 2k3 a good upgrade?
<0> Stew2 i'm no windows server guru myself, but aparently it is
<8> hello
<0> it has lots of improvemnts and is more complex
<0> from what people coming here said
<0> however you might want to read about the different editions of Windows Server 2003
<0> before you decide to purchase one of them
<7> hello all ;p
<0> HiToAll your nick is explicit enough :P
<7> hehe
<7> ;p
<2> how long does it take to install vista
<8> hi Frostfyre
<0> depends on your computer's ressources
<9> hey ScanDisk-
<0> Mekon that's another of your highly vague questions ?
<0> with obvious answers ?
<9> mmm.
<0> in fact, it takes 35 mins 23 seconds and 5 ms .. try it for youself, if i'm wrong... my bad
<9> Skello = dork.
<2> is it faster than an xp install or slower
<0> Frostfyre that's a compliment coming from you :D
<9> hmm, i wonder what you'd consider an insult then you dialup using, low memory, MFM hard drive using AOLer
<9> :D
<0> Mekon you can install XP on a P III with 128 MB RAM while you can't do that with Vista and you need minimum 512 MB RAM and obviously a better Processor ... thus comparing the two, you'd say Vista installs faster, however if you attempt to install XP on the same machine you might realize XP install is faster
<9> "might"?
<0> maybe you see now why that question is highly vague without additional details
<9> exores, heya
<0> it's like asking: Why do people have two hands ? .. amongst the many possible answers onw could say: Because people like switching hands sometimes while jerkin off
<10> heya Frostfyre;)
<9> im outta coffee, so i've resorted to earl grey tea.
<9> :D i just had a client drop off another machine.
<9> easy 60 USD :)
<9> i like switching fingers while picking my nose.
<9> 10 opportunities! (20 if im flexible)
<5> tip to os commerce: dont annoy me your db will go to /dev/null
<5> stupid thing
<9> tsk tsk.
<9> smacktalkin'
<9> Skello: I put XP on a p2/300 with 160MB of ram:D
<0> jpm5 i'm playing with Zen Cart right now
<0> much more clean and stable than oscommerce
<9> 2
<0> anyway bbl
<9> *twiddle*
<11> federalu' script - best script ever! =))
<12> =)
<12> Ok people, i have a problem regarding the nvdisp display driver (more accurately NVidia GF4 MX440). When it goes into screen standby it does not set the VFreq to 0.
<11> T|pu, tried to hit it with a hammer?
<12> so, the screen doesn't turn off, but stays blank. can i set it somewhere to set both HFreq and VFreq to 0 when going into screen standby?
<12> Razva^ i did... many..... many times
<11> ok than try the spanking part
<11> as I can remember you live at the 3rd level?
<12> 4th
<12> no seriousely, i dunno what to do with it
<12> and that started happening after i installed another display adapter, after wich i installed MX440 back
<12> but didn't work anymore
<9> turn off display power management and install the latest driver.
<12> i did all that :| but still no results


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #windows
or
Go to some related logs:

haxi fis sorm
ormoc chat
forbiden page
leet speak script
arag rega
convert string to char* C++
#teens
cycleshoes
piscatologist
does flv compete with mpeg4



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes