| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Comments:
<0> i m uSing WindowsXP When i Startup my Operating System i got an error.. you maybe a Victim of Software CounterFieting
<0> Whats that and how i Fisk that Error?
<0> Anyone ?
<0> AnyOne hEreL?>
<1> anyone ever use Microsoft's HTML Help Workshop program?
<0> Anyone here for help plz?
<2> ask Firown
<0> dude when i started my windows i got a msg .. you maybe a victim of software counterfieting.. then there is two option solve the problem or resolve it later.. i choose 2nd one.. then windows start. on system try there iz icon there and its show the msg again n again and halt my system during msg me.. i m using WindowsXP. any way to solve this issue?
<2> duno
<2> try formatting it
<2> did u google the issue?
<2> google it
<0> ..
<0> i d0nt want to format it
<3> ((((((((((((( razvan^ ))))))))))))))))
<4> can vhosts be done in win2k?
<4> one ip ***igned via dhcp another ***ighned static one manualy entered on the same interface
<3> i see
<3> hi winkey
<3> i'm not sure if any of my helpers is awake
<3> if no replies try #computerhelp
<3> wb RealFaux :))
<5> hi there, does anyone know how to make a diskless windows xp box? I have a computer that I think the hd is about to fail, and no money for now for a new hd... and I have plently of hd on this box... it's doable easilly with linux, but the familly like winxp :/
<3> hi A****aka
<3> i'll find out
<5> I searched in the past, but all what I saw was with thin client specially made for that
<6> [chalcedony] :D
<6> hey
<3> hey :))
<3> OnEx|TO: are you in #windows ?
<3> oops we ARE in #windows
<6> :D
<3> need new gl***es
<6> im no acces in the channel :(
<3> iknow .. have to wait till Razvan wakes up
<6> :p
<7> werd.
<6> [X] Lo siento, tu acceso es insuficiente para ejecutar esta orden.
<6> :(
<7> A****aka, There are no Diskless ways to run Windows. Windows has a kernal (base program) that must already be extracted/runable.
<7> The only diskless things that I can think of is like.... Ubuntu LIVE!
<5> that's what I tought... but it's easy with any linux
<7> Yeah. I just cant imagine seeing windows running diskless. If I ever seen that, I'd be VERY asaunished.
<7> The kernel just isnt built for that kind of support.
<5> nfs, tftp, nfs and custom kernel... some dhcpd options and it's done...
<5> yeah
<5> but I tought that there may be some loader...
<7> Ubuntu LIVE is even easier than that, in most cases.
<5> I doubt so
<3> there is plenty of support for ubuntu
<7> A****aka, The only thing I can think of would be to have an MSDOS image extracted on a CD, bootable, and windows 98 extracted as well.
<7> That is as close as I can think of. and that's prolly not do'able.
<5> you need nfs for the files transfert, tftpd for the kernel transfert, the dhcpd must say what to download and a kernel that support network boot and nfs swap
<7> BUT, win98 would want to write to SOMETHING. So.... A CD would be read only, unless the windows kernel had a way to write-on-demand to the cd. which is very improbable.
<5> win98 is doable
<7> but how is windows going to make a pagefile, write to registry, or write to the many ini's?
<7> cuz nothing lets windows modify CDRW on the fly like that.
<5> you basically make a floppy image, that load a network driver, map C: as a network share and then start win98
<7> an hdd from another computer?
<7> of course.
<5> win98 would work in compatibility mode for the hd
<5> yes
<5> I have 600 gigs on this comp
<7> I was ***uming you were dealing with NO HARDDISK
<5> none on the remote comp, but I have one in this "server"
<7> Well, That'd be your BEST bet. Map a drive, Use MSDOS networking stuff.
<5> hmmm another question, I have a comp downstair at 50 feet of cat5 cable, and my cousin want to add a comp to my network.. which is 50 feet away from the comp downstair... would you run a 100' cable from this switch to the one in the basement? or from the one downstair put a new switch and run the second 50' to the new comp?
<5> so win98 or linux...
<5> I'ld go linux in that case :D
<5> would be safer and faster probably
<5> (they only listen to mp3 and browse the net)
<7> With the wire/router situation.... I think it's really a personal preference. If you add a router, It'll be less wire to buy and you can add more nodes, BUT it is one extra component that could cause a problem one day. If you buy the wire, You wont have to buy a router and will be more direct of a connection.
<7> So, It's really equally balanced. As far as performance, You'll get the same either way.
<7> So, It's about customization. What YOU want.
<7> err.....
<7> router=switch
<7> I dunno why I am thinking routers.
<7> lol
<7> or not even a switch. a hub.
<5> hmm 100' I think I will get
<7> I like to bum my cat5e from the teleco or cableco
<7> The telephone company used to give me 1500 feet every time I seen them.
<7> lol
<7> I could have LAN'ed the freakin` neighborhood.
<7> Nah... More like the county.
<7> I did have a 1250 foot line ran to a friends house.
<7> That was odd.
<5> lol
<5> yeah, 85 meters limit by specs
<5> which is in reality 170M reliable
<7> I had to add an inline amplifier since I p***ed the threshhold.
<5> and with a better cable you can get more...
<5> yeah, that was probably the best way
<7> There are usually 8 wires in CAT5. Orange and Orange/White - Green and Green/White
<7> those are the only ones really used in a cat5.
<7> So, I take the other two pair and hook them to the orange and green ones. So it makes each line alittle more thicker.
<5> not good
<7> wiring up two, two pairs of copper to make it more conductive rather.
<7> Sure. There's no problem with that.
<7> The other wires are NEVER used in computer networking.
<7> only Orange and Orange/White - Green and Green/White
<5> lower the resistance but mess with the propagation delay, will add echo....
<5> and
<5> you change the cable characteristic, so you get more signal bouncing
<7> Yeah, As I said, I had inline amps and magnetic filter.
<7> Everything ran okay.
<7> It did take engineering. I had a friend come over with a cable testing machine to measure all the specs of what the line could/would push.
<7> We adjusted as needed, Kept a tight scan on the line for a bit.
<7> My whole family builds cellphone towers.
<7> So, I'm familiar with RF, Data, etc.
<7> hehe
<7> My cousins climb them. Uncle is foreman, and my brother is a datacenter tech/inspector.
<7> I dont do anything cellphone involved.
<7> you gotta start out climbing, and I have vertigo
<7> lol
<3> oh kewl Gohan :))
<3> --'--,-{@ --'--,-{@Intuitive@}-'--@}--'--
<7> hmm. RealFaux.... That's a cool nickname.
<7> lol
<5> the comp downstair piss me off, there is atleast 2 bad sectors that the hd refuse to correct
<5> and scandisk don't see them
<7> Hmmm.... Are you doing the detailed scan?
<7> there's a name for it.... I cant remember what it's called
<7> a sector scan I guess...
<5> well, it's xp...
<7> Oh, Yeah, XP doesnt have the sector scan.
<7> Do you have a blank floppydisk?
<5> well, I run on linux right now
<5> found 3 files in bad sectors
<5> the first was a mp3 that wasn't even supposed to be there
<7> err.... You need to get a MS-DOS 6.22 bootdisk and run scandisk from there.
<7> It will give you an option to do a detailed scan, or sector scan.... something like that.
<5> the second was sonic stage optimised file... which only waste space..
<5> and the last was a file in the sp2 backup dir
<5> yeah
<5> but I'm using linux to force the hd to remap it
<7> Yeah, U need to get the older scandisk, use the detailed/sector/whatever scan and write-out the bad sectors.
<5> yeah
<5> but I prefer my way :D
<7> Indeed.
<5> more painfull, but "cleaner"
<7> I'm a FreeBSD person myself.
<7> :)
<7> I know linux too. If you know one, You know the other.
<5> yeah, well, mainly
<5> I was lost first when I went to a suse box...
<5> I'm used to gentoo
<5> with compiler installed and working
<5> it was a pain to get suse to compile...
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux
ubuntu kernel_parameters
#chatzone
qawsalla f'nofs bahar
#windows
#skype
kiwies girls . com
#london
noghty
#linux
|
|