| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> hi PurpleCow hi GnomeUp
<0> how is all today?
<1> ok lemme check on nav
<1> nprotect.exe is only using 340k, its deactivated
<1> oh, norton 2003
<2> Can i make the automatic update run, in a way?
<2> I mean, the greyed thing is gone now, but can i make it not wait till its scheduled
<3> Carve what u wanna make automatic?
<4> if you don't want to wait for the automatic update just use windows update manually
<2> Well, my iexplorer has outdated =)
<2> so they tell to use automatic
<0> Carve -> press start -> All programms -> Windows Update
<2> not there :p
<0> PurpleCow sry to intterrupt ;)
<0> Carve u have sp2 ya?
<2> ye
<0> open Settings -> Security Center -> Windows Update
<2> okay, well i can update from inet now, after i got it enabled
<0> ok
<1> i thing that my norton is takin about less then 10mb
<5> I have a question:
<1> i might have an answer:
<6> anyone know anything about CPUs?
<1> lol, what do ya need to know about cpus
<5> GnomeUp Can you come up with a software proggy, free, which posts images from a webcam on a website. I run the website locally?
<1> haha, i see to many bad thing alwready, so the awnser is nope
<1> well, nav is disable from the boot
<2> what about cpu's?
<2> So what do you guys think Spybot or Defender?
<1> is defender any good?
<7> i need help settin up a gateway to use internet
<1> did you bridge it?
<7> even if i do... doesnt change nothin
<1> ok, on your pc, does your pc have a specific ip or it is set on automatic
<7> on the 1st ethernet adapter.... automatic
<1> the pc ( desktop ) I mean
<7> 1st ethernet adapter automatic i said lol
<7> i have 2 ethernet adapters on the pc
<7> and the laptop is connected to the 2nd ethernet adapter
<7> ?
<1> is your laptop connected to the ethernet card that is on automatic ip?
<7> no
<1> that is the problem
<7> ughhhhh
<7> 1st ethernet adapter is connected to a router
<7> 2nd ethernet adapter is connected to the laptop
<5> anna nicole smith just died.
<1> set you laptop to a varient of the last digitals for the pc and laptop to comminicate
<2> serious?
<5> yeah (OT)
<7> Carve yes
<5> found in a hotel room unconcious.
<2> that is :/
<1> ie: 192.168.01 = desktop and you 192.168.02 = laptop
<5> another hollywood celebrity death. I had to ask, 'was she the fat one'? I guess mabye she lost the weight?
<7> 1st ethernet adapter i leave automatic
<7> 2nd ethernet adapter what ip subnetmask and gateway do i put
<5> Celph-Titled If you have a router, why not just plug in the other PC to another port on the router? Must have at least 4 ports...
<7> Stew2 the router is upstairs
<2> u cant connect the laptop with the pc with a standard kat5 cable
<7> and the ethernet cable cant reach it lol
<2> u need a "crossed" cable
<5> Celph-Titled Buy a 10 dollar/euro hub
<7> a hub for a router ???
<5> and put it downstairs in place of your existing pc.
<5> yeah, sure.
<7> i have a switch hub
<5> You can daisy chain almost as many switches as you need.
<5> Yeah, use that.
<7> but doesnt work with a router
<5> whaa?
<2> if u can connect the pc to it a switch works
<5> that doesn't make any sense. The hub/switch just repeats the signal on every port. A switch is a little smarter.
<5> sometimes both a simple switch and a hub (of which one hardly sees any basic hubs anymore) are referred to collectively as 'hubs', since they do basically the same task.
<5> Just take your switched hub and plug in one port to the router, and plug the other computers into remaining ports on the switched hub.
<5> It will work fine.
<5> stick a fork innit.
<5> awww
<1> is the milliseconds low with a pc firewall on a internet connection?
<5> GnomeUp should be.
<5> GnomeUp The firewall should not increase the ping delay.
<5> GnomeUp Not noticably, anyway.
<1> what if i play a shooter on a : isp / modem cable / pc firewall/ router / then my pc
<5> No
<5> it shouldn't slow you down.
<1> good then
<5> Your ISP/internet connection to Tier 1 networks should introduce more delay than any of the local setup stuff.
<5> What is the contention ration?
<5> ratio?
<1> well, its not established yet
<5> The local setup is going to be negligable.
<5> Oh
<5> Well, anyway, that's essentially what I've seen pricing structure based on. And it does affect ping delays.
<1> its gonna be wifi long distance connection, from my home to the antenna that is about 10km from here
<5> 1:40, or 1:12. Difference in price. There's speed; then there is bandwidth. Two different things.
<5> What kind of system? Wimaxx with some kind of external antenna?
<8> you should not let the ISP handle your traffic queueing, this will cause ACK packages for important services like ping, SSH or 80 to get a big latency
<1> nah, just wifi, i think its 3.4ghz
<5> yeah, whatever skello sez takes precidence.
<5> should be 2.4x or 5.x
<8> use a firewall router that is able to set priorities
<5> anyway, that's a stupid technical detail.
<8> group priorities based on traffic made on particular ports
<8> set ping, 22 to high, set 80 for browsing to normal, and p2p or other stuff to low
<5> Yeah. I do the same thing skello is talking about here, with a buffalo WHR-HP-G54 and DD-WRT.
<5> QoS
<5> QoS is your friend.
<8> anyway, just my opinion :)
<8> QoS on the OS end , at least Windows is not that great
<5> an informed opinion.
<8> :)
<5> skello, I was meaning the QoS in the DD-WRT software.
<5> skello some linux thingy. it's all programmable through the web interface. Use Opera tho.... works better for setting it up.
<8> yeah i understood, just pointing out that Windows and any OS in general has a QoS service too, not to be confused with the router one
<5> oh okay. I have never used the QoS in windows.
<8> sure you do
<8> everytime you use it
<8> you use it with default settings though
<8> Windows actually reserves 20% of your bandwith or so at all timesa
<8> for QoS purposes
<1> QoS? can i see that in my windows?
<5> Skello, I thought I read somewhere it doesn't reserve any, unless there is a QoS app written for it, which is using QoS.
<5> GnomeUp It's in your network connection properties. One can add and remove it.
<8> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316666
<5> yeah, what skello said.
<8> Stew2 i preffer using IPCOP, which is also a web interface management based router/firewall, built on the linux kernel, acts as a stand-alone OS, works even on ancient 486 computers though not indicated since proxy services if you plan on using one would require more bandwith
<8> it's a port of SmoothWall you could say
<8> but it's open source
<8> thus totally free
<8> www.ipcop.org
<5> cool
<5> don't have any old 486's living anymore.
<5> slowest machine is my p3 1000, and it's also my server and everything else... except the hardware router.
<5> good to know, tho.
<1> lol, i have a 500mhz
<5> GnomeUp My wife has the P3 500. It's a laptop.
<9> i have a 166MMX machine running windows98.
<8> Stew2 it works very fine on a p3 1000
<1> celeron, i changed the cooler on it, its a athlon cooler, bigger and better, put a led to reduce the current so that the fan would make less noise
<8> i said it CAN work on a 486.. which is intriguing
<5> Oh okay.
<8> but will work on any new machine just fine
<8> a 486 is like minimum requirements
<8> i wouldn't dedicate a P4 for it though, too much wasted ressources
<8> doesn't need so much
<1> well, this system here is taking 40watts idle and 62watts primed95
<5> hmmm. about the same here.
<1> i cut the psu fan, i read that its not good, 235watts psu, but will mabe connect back the fan but with a led so the voltage is reduced
<1> less noise
<5> cudo's for you: save the trees.
<10> why an led? use an old fashioned resistor
Return to
#windows
or
Go to some related
logs:
qedin sew
#c++
#linux
fry smoked salmon
#MissKitten
#AllNiteCafe
#c
mr. hands.avi
#AllNiteCafe
#mirc
|
|