@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19



Comments:

<0> cool.
<0> :D
<1> that's why I asked in romanian
<0> sk8ing, I'm romanian too. I was just completely surprised.
<1> heh :)
<1> nice
<0> :)
<0> yes.
<1> there are a lot of romanians in here
<0> realy?
<1> archaeus, is one of them
<0> I'm just a beginner, so I haven't been here for too long.
<0> hi archaeus
<2> greetings zephyr_ :)



<1> I'm here since yesterday :))
<0> lol.
<3> sk8ing its holding "on"
<0> Ang3lu5, I can tell ... since yesterday ... and it's almost 11 pm ... :)
<3> tell what
<0> Ang3lu5, that he's holding on...
<1> :D
<1> lol
<0> but ... I'm going back to my code ... :P
<1> it's about his code
<1> :P
<4> narf
<0> what is about my code?
<1> <3> sk8ing its holding "on"
<4> I think he meant chode
<1> it was about a variable
<1> the variable was holding "on" :D
<3> i have checked
<0> ohhh ,... ok ... :P
<1> :P
<3> the data is being retrived correctly
<3> its in the p***ing its messing up
<4> yeay
<0> Cool.
<4> service pack four
<0> it works.
<0> :D
<4> of course it works
<4> rfc 1925 rule number one it has to work
<3> i think this may be a html problem
<4> I think it's 1925
<0> lol
<4> yeah it is
<4> look at me being all cool quoting rfc's
<5> Say you have an object with a method Add(). Do you prefer to p*** values to the method or set the object properties and then run Add() with no (or very few) arguments? I see it done both ways and I'm wondering what the theory is behind one way over the other.
<5> I really only use oop for error handling and to organize. I don't do anything complicated with it.
<3> well
<6> i just p*** the values to the method, but whatever floats your boat i guess
<7> evening
<6> i guess if you have several functions that use the same values, setting them in the object properties would product cleaner code
<5> Yeah. One issue I see with setting the properties then running the method is that...say you add a new "user" and you set the properties...if the addition fails (for any reason) you gotta clear out all of those properties.. That is tedious to me.
<5> I guess you don't have to...but it bothers me that those properties are left in that instance when they are incorrect (for whatever reason).
<5> So that the instance has virtually the same appearance as having run a successful LoadUser() or something...sans the user id, say. Hmm...whatever.
<1> it's better to use Add()
<1> it can return true or false
<5> So you are for setting the properties and running ->Add() with no args?
<1> anyhow, if you set myInstance->someval=3;
<1> and add adds that value somewhere
<1> it can check it
<1> and still return false if it's not ok
<1> if you'll use those values only for temporary use, then it is ok
<1> but it's better not to use them at all, you can define them inside your function
<1> global variables ****s
<1> no
<5> Ok so here is another quesiton. I was thinking that I could store constraints in the constructor, and have a SetProperty() function that handled validation.
<1> ->Add(...);
<1> why do you want to set the propertyes before calling the function?
<5> Because now I just validate in the method being called, rather than when the arguments themselves are set.
<1> you can create an internal function that validates a set of params, but still you don't have to declare them as global if they're temp vars
<5> sk8ing, no I'm not saying that I want to...I'm saying that I've seen it both ways and was wondering which was better.
<1> better is with no global temporary variables



<5> what do you mean by global temporary vars?
<1> cl*** x { somevar; therealVar; function add() { therealvar=somever; } }
<1> cl*** x { therealVar; function add($x) { therealvar=$x; } }
<1> that's better
<5> Yeah that is how I do it now.
<1> it's cleaner
<5> Just wondering why I see people doing it the other way sometimes.
<5> One thing I hate...is p***ing 20 arguments to a method...it's a mess.
<1> they do it fast/ they don't care/ they're dumb
<5> Got it.
<7> rdw
<8> oh no, its you again, sirKNIGHT77
<7> evening pieg nicce reseing you
<8> is there any poison in it, JC^Omega ?:)
<8> reseing ?
<7> 0-o
<8> in my piece, JC
<8> how are you dude ?
<4> mm good
<4> that was your piece
<4> ;)
<4> I'm good
<4> eating pizza
<4> chicken is thawin
<4> going to make some chicken leggs tonight for dinner
<5> That sounds good. Marinated in pesto and grilled.
<4> limon pepper rub
<4> then bar b que sause
<5> Rubs are good.
<8> i begin to be hungry now ;/
<9> gd spyware
<5> I used to do salt, pepper, olive oil, and oregano marinade and then grill with bbq sauce.
<4> yeah
<4> I'm not a big marinade person
<10> guys , i've lost my phpmyadmin p***word , is there any way to reset it ?
<4> I like rub's more
<5> Me either and I regret giving you that impression.
<4> they are ok
<4> if you wanna babby them
<4> and keep putting the sauce on while you cook
<4> and you wanna cook at a low temp
<4> if you wanna get the food done
<4> rub is the way to go
<4> salt, peper, limon peper
<4> then bar b q sauce at the end
<4> your set
<5> I grill a lot of tri-tip. I use this special smoked hungarian paprika.
<5> kosher salt, brown sugar... and a slew of other stuff.
<4> yeah
<4> I wanna do a tri tip
<5> I put fennel seed in my pork rib rub.
<5> Are you on the west coast?
<5> I'm always surprised to see that people outside of CA don't know what tri-tip is.
<4> I'm in Las Cruces, NM
<4> but my prefered barbq is North Carolina style
<4> cause that's where I grew up
<4> so usually it's pig or chicken
<4> not a lot of beef
<5> Yeah...I dig it.
<5> North Carolina is the chicken capital of the country, I believe.
<4> just somethin bout pork and vineager
<5> Oh wait...maybe SC.
<4> ksc barbq is good too... and so is texas style
<5> You have a smoker?
<4> I think my dad does
<3> well for some reason its suddenly started working
<5> Man...an 8lb pork butt on a smoker for 12 hours is one of the best things you can eat.
<4> yeah... aside from a pig pickin
<4> get two or three hogs
<4> cookin for day or two
<5> Oh yeah...good point.


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #php
or
Go to some related logs:

#php
#london
#php
#london
#AllNiteCafe
ellinides
cycrow
xmlhttpobject best function
chatzone 2
#php



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes