| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> Personally, I would use just the text (a different font, that one kind of ****s) and the flowers
<1> thats really boring heh
<0> Flowers would make a nice logo if they were monotone
<0> Minimalism is good.
<0> You need that flame bar or the dripping blood
<2> anyone knows where can i find one, i don't know much of php coding
<0> Also the rotating skull that sais "mail" over it
<0> Because this is shaping up to be the best geocities page since 1997
<0> S0nyX: Google.
<3> Hajuu yeah theres a monotone version
<3> Hajuu but this is like.. the only image on there... so needs to do a fair amount of 'selling'
<3> Hajuu visually
<3> ****in dialup
<0> But it doesn't need to be ugly.
<3> thats not *ugly*
<3> far from it.
<0> On a web page, it would be
<0> And distracting
<3> its MADE to be distracting
<3> heh
<0> Your logo should not be distracting.
<3> on a media page it should attract a certain amount of attention.
<4> it should be captivating.. :)
<5> Hajuu: not desaturate permanently, desaturate to determine its contrast ratio
<5> :)
<3> chaotiqua: I have no idea what you mean, but desaturation just removes the green bits..
<3> which doesnt seem helpful
<5> desaturation should turn it into a grayscale image?
<1> Yeah... Removing the colour, but I can see how bright it is before hand
<1> theres so little colour
<5> it's just a tool of determining how ***aulting to the eye is a certain image
<1> seems pointless.
<1> um ok.
<1> :D
<4> http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/tekken/tekken...mans-178609.php
<4> LOL
<1> Ok so.. need a colour...
<1> lol
<1> stat.
<4> green
<1> dark/light?
<1> /fluro ?
<4> reggae colors
<1> I rly rly need some new fonts
<1> havent been bothered in linux
<6> i need root php // prv me // pls
<5> what's "root php" ?
<5> root permissions for a php program?
<7> php -f process.php
<7> Segmentation fault
<7> :(
<5> bah
<5> for some reason i don't comprehend sessions
<5> i'd rather do the negotiation manually with cookies
<1> cai
<1> you bastard
<1> are you there?
<0> I might be.
<8> morning guys
<8> chaotiqua, who cares ?
<0> Yo mama.
<8> mama ?
<0> Indeed.
<8> why mama ?
<0> Because.
<5> who cares? no one. i was trolling for someone to toss me a good tutorial out. read 5-6 so far, all ****.
<8> cai, now i understand!
<0> Who needs tutorials? Sessions are simple.
<5> they seem cryptic to me
<0> You session_start() at the top of each page you want, then you deal with $_SESSION however you want, and it'll be the same on every page.
<0> Voila.
<5> how do you "log off"?
<8> chaotiqua, you set a session, session array or varuables and you do session_start everywhere needed
<8> you unset the session
<0> unset the session variables.
<5> so to log off, i call session_start() and then session_destroy() ?
<8> yes
<5> how do you determine if a session is active? do i just create a variable "youareloggedinretard" and check it?
<0> I think session_destroy() is basically deprecated
<5> session_unset then?
<8> unset($_SESSION)
<0> Let me check the manual
<0> Ah, manual says session_unset() is the more deprecated version
<0> And that session_destroy() should be used over it
<0> And session_unset() says not to use unset($_SESSION), but does not offer a very good reason ("this will disable the registering of session variables through the $_SESSION superglobal." (Duh, that's why you're erasing it.)
<5> so far so good.. hrmm.. guess confusing part for me was determining if someone is logged on
<5> guess that part is up to me to determine
<0> You don't.
<0> There's no way to know whether or not a user is still on your site, since HTTP does not keep a constant connection.
<5> so how would you typically check if someone is authenticated, somewhere in middle of your site?
<5> sorry, bad choice of words. meant to say 'auth'd'
<0> I'd have a library that checks it everywhere it needs to be checked
<0> and auth'd == authenticated
<5> interesting
<5> i believe the part that had me confused was the part where i put session_start() everywhere.
<5> the name is a misnomer.
<0> Of sorts.
<0> It does what it means, and if you know how PHP works, it makes sense.
<0> However, to a newcomer, it may seem like session_start() would only need to be called once.
<5> eh, i'm old school. everything used to be called _init in my days
<5> these new hipsters and their code.
<0> How old are you?
<5> old enough to have used the venerable Z80 :(
<0> Quite old, then
<0> Ancient, perhaps
<5> considering the fact that a typical snotty burger flipper in california these days knows more, then yes, ancient.
<0> I feel the same way with these crappy new fangled languages these days, so it's all good
<5> at some point i begin to think that there are way too many languages out there. i would think there are 4-5 that matter.
<5> 1- ***embly 2- c
<5> rest are interpreted..but have not categorized them
<0> asm, c, java, php, sh, and I *guess* c++
<5> there is just nothing fundamentally different between later languages
<5> with one exception, and this one is a bizarre one
<5> labview ... but .. that was created for ignorant engineers.
<0> Can't say I've used it
<5> basically instead of writing code (like a normal person would), you literally draw a flowchart.
<5> and the flowchart isn't even a flowchart. it's more of a schematic
<0> Sad :/
<0> Yeah, just wikipedia'd, it's got screenshots
<5> yeah... does wonders for real-time applications
<5> problem is this - when you NEED sequences..what do you do?
<0> I used to have this java program that worked similarly
<5> and the answer is quite complicated..gimmicky
<5> anyway, that's the only bizarre language i've seen. rest are just gimmicks upon gimmicks.
<5> i dare say the only improvement over c/c++ in other, later interpreted languages is : strings.
<5> there are C interpreters out there..so..why use perl? or python? etc..
<5> but C string support is downright painful
<0> People like the syntax
<0> You get used to it
<5> of course.
<5> all the languages i use now have the same syntax..and i like that. makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
<0> I pretty much only do C these days
<5> a friend of mine asked me to help debug his code.. so i looked at it.
<5> it was a web counter written in perl. i rewrote it in C in 10 lines and benchmarked it
<5> it worked about 200 times faster than the perl version
<0> Naturally
<5> not that the performance really mattered.
<0> Not that the perl one was slow, I'm sure
<0> It's all relative
<5> debugging the perl one was a pain in the rear.. watching it under linux just spat dozens and dozens of pages of linked libraries, etc.
<5> in the end, it's a matter of comfort and development time.
<5> i think PHP has this great tradeoff between stability and ability to quickly prototype an application
<1> oh god its you
<1> you.... revolutionist.
<5> hrm.. ?
<5> i met the creator of php once.
<5> dare say he's a hippie.
<1> How does one do a gradient with transperancy in gimp?
Return to
#php
or
Go to some related
logs:
#php
#AllNiteCafe
site:www.quotesdb.info undernet.ro.parola
#linux
bash +date arithmatic
#mirc
#london
ubuntu reconfigure php5 mssql
#chatzone
#c++
|
|