| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Comments:
<0> Papa: it's late, but I use acronym, abbr, and cite all the damn time.
<0> Or, all the damn time I'm using acronyms, abbreviations, or citations
<1> I haven't quite understood the difference between q and cite
<2> dravine
<2> you around?
<3> yeah
<2> heh
<0> q is deprecated, no? It's been a while since I've checked.
<2> http://www.hidebehind.com/show2.php?iid=CD655DB2.gif
<3> finally got this horrid old email script working
<2> it calls.. http://www.hidebehind.com/showimage2.php?iid=CD655DB2.gif
<3> hahaha
<2> proper headers and everything
<1> kaneda_: it validates at W3C for me
<2> but.. form viewing the source, people are just linking to http://www.hidebehind.com/showimage2.php?iid=CD655DB2.gif
<2> since there is no ad.
<2> how would you stop them?
<0> the_ru: damn, it is valid. okay, scratch that.
<4> lol @ that gif
<2> heh
<3> DEWEZ, check the referrer_url in showimage2.php
<1> kaneda_: although it could be valid, but its further use discouraged, I guess
<3> and if it's not your site with the ad, redirect them to the spot with the add
<0> ru: it isn't. It's valid.
<3> if($_SERVER['REFERRER_URL']!= $yoursite){header('Location: '.$yoursite.$iid);}
<1> kaneda_: ok. then, however, the question remains; what's the difference?
<0> I use <q> for short quotations (like a quote from a movie) and I use <cite> when I'm citing books, or writing names of books or movies or such. (I liked <cite>Phantom of the Opera</cite>)
<2> wtf, i tried that
<2> oh.. i used HTTP_REFERER
<1> I use q for quotes, then cite for names
<0> ru: that's how I understand it
<1> including people names
<0> I wouldn't use it for people's names
<2> does REFERRER_URL exist?
<0> But names of magazines, or movies, or books or whatever. Created works.
<2> isn't it HTTP_REFERER
<3> print_r($_SERVER)
<3> I'm probably wrong on the exact name of it
<1> kaneda_: how do you think I should write names then? just as text?
<0> ru: yeah.
<0> Nothing special about people's names.
<5> small question: when I done example mssql_result($rs, 0, "TexteAccueil1");
<5> It me return my text but the problem, it does not give me the whole text. Just a party (255 characters) when my field minimum 1000 characters
<0> Unless you wanna make them look different, then wrap them in a <span> with a cl***.
<0> NEXUS`: IIRC there's a problem with MSSQL and Varchar fields being truncated at 255 chars regardless of the length of the field.
<1> hm, ok
<0> I don't remember more than that though, and I may be remembering incorrectly
<6> correct, you need to convert them to test
<6> text
<7> meh, another job offer fell through :(
<1> kaneda_: however, "The usage of BLOCKQUOTE to indent text is deprecated in favor of style sheets."
<2> http://www.hidebehind.com/show.php?iid=3C74A4D8.jpg
<2> can you see that?
<0> ru: true. But the XHTML1.0 spec still says it's not deprecated. And even if it were, you could use <p cl***="quotation"> or whatever.
<5> kaneda_ .. my DB is SQL Server not MySQL
<5> is not possible more 255 carac. or mssql
<5> ?
<0> NEXUS`: which is why I said MSSQL.
<1> kaneda_: yes, I ***ume that's the direction "they" want us to go
<0> ru: damn the man. Code to HTML2 standards. Go go gadget-bad-markup.
<5> k
<8> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/
<5> kaneda_ there is you a means with MSSQL for I be able when meme to have the return of + of 255 caracteres
<9> "The usage of BLOCKQUOTE to indent text is deprecated in favor of style sheets."
<9> BUT blockquotes ARN"T deprecated.
<9> They say just use it when quoting, not as design.
<0> Makes sense, _TaSm
<0> That's what I would have ***umed, anyway.
<9> Wherd.
<10> yow, if i implement ajax and set session vars inside the script called by ajax, can i retrieve those variables from the main script calling them?
<0> NEXUS`: I'm not certain. Convert to a text field? THis is the limit of my knowledge.
<9> Prob is that designers have been using HTML wrong for so long, and with CSS, the W3 is really stressing that you use the correct symantec markup.
<9> Kinda like <b> vs <strong>
<0> Fernando: I would imagine so, if you serialize()'d em, and put them in the query string? Maybe?
<9> <b> should make text bold, <strong> should be used to make test "strong".
<10> nice
<2> dravine, i have this guy on firefox 1.5 PC who can't see the image. do certain browsers not sent the REFERER?
<0> _TaSm: I'm totally with the W3C on that one. I'm big on semantic markup.
<9> Wherd.
<1> _TaSm: ah, guess I didn't read that line carefully enough
<9> Well up until the browsers semisupported CSS, it wasn't really possilbe to do nice layout w/o tables, etc.
<0> Agreed. But now that those days are past us, we really should take advantage of semantic markup and CSS-based layouts.
<0> Table layouts are like old Soviet technology. Just because it's still workable doesn't mean it's a good idea, there, Lenin.
<9> <i> carries no semantic meaning beyond "make this italicized"; if
<9> italics are not available, there is no fallback rendering that I'm aware of
<9> <em> means emphasized text; certain browsers render emphasized text in
<9> italics, though this is not required
<9> <b> carries no semantic meaning beyond "make this bold"; if bold is not
<9> available, there is no fallback rendering that I'm aware of
<9> <strong> means strongly emphasized text; certain browsers render
<9> strongly emphasized text in bold, though this is not required
<8> huh ?
<0> _TaSM: that a quote from the w3c spec?
<9> Na, just related articles.
<0> I love it when "standards-based layout" people tell me that I shouldn't use <b> because it's *depreciated*
<9> hah.
<9> Just use b if you litterally only want somthing bold.
<0> Right
<9> I generally define strong as bold and a color.
<9> That way people I work with realize there is a difference.
<9> If you want it colored, ie strong, use strong.
<9> If you just want a word bold, use bold.
<0> Also, using tags that way helps screen-readers and search engines. Not everything that parses HTML is a visual based web browser.
<9> Its hard to get that distinction in your head though.
<9> Exactly, screen-readers+ and search engine++++++++++
<0> Once you're past the initial hump of understanding it becomes easier.
<0> It's the concept that old-hat web developers sometimes miss.
<9> I talk to people on a daily basis that are too stupid to realize multiple H1's will HURT them in SEO.
<11> what does this mean: !tell junix|work about at
<11> opps
<12> ...
<11> what does this mean: Column count doesn't match value count at row 1
<0> Means: try #mysql?
<9> S^Gerbitz sounds like your asking for too many columns or cols that dont exist in your table.
<11> _TaSm - can I message you
<0> _TaSm: what do you do?
<9> S^Gerbitz, keep it in the channel.
<9> kaneda_, I'm a CTO at a small .com
<0> really? What's it called?
<11> _TaSm - will you review my code, and tell me where to look, dont tell me whats wrong, but where to look at my code to fix it
<9> S^Gerbitz I'd have to be able to see your DB schema too, but you want you can put it on pastebin.com and I'm sure someone will take a look.
<4> S^Gerbitz: this is really sad
<9> kaneda_, Top Secret.
<11> http://pastebin.com/547183
<4> you've been told 9999999999 times what's wrong in #phphelp and now you come in here?
<13> mike jones!
<0> ...is that's what it's called? Or are you giving me a cl***ification level beyond what I'm allowed to see?
<4> mike jones!
<9> kaneda_, Right, I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.
<4> i'm lookin' for a diiiiime that's top o' the line
<0> ...well, I've had a good run.
<4> cute face little waist with a big behind
<9> rdw, if you want that, just ditch the camero and get an import ;)
<14> :/topic #php
<13> shes gods gift to the world
<3> so
<14> nevermand that
<4> _TaSm: haha
<4> man, i hate imports
<3> we just concluded that we could replace this old *** server with a soekris box and a 1 gig cf card
<11> PapaBear - stop singing that stupid song
<9> hahahah dravine
<3> and it'd actually be faster proc and better hardware
<9> What was it doing?
<9> Hosting?
<3> old internal ****
<9> Ah.
<3> purchase order forms
Return to
#php
or
Go to some related
logs:
What caused D H Lawrence's early death ?
hihowareyou
GTK_CONFIG experiment
unhandled exception subclass c++
Kimberly Berly
ACLDENY - - - (
IPdetect script afraid
#linux
cycleshoes
SIOCSIFFLAGS Invalid Arguments
|
|
