| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Comments:
<0> testing out these new ajax features and i'm on linux, so i can't test in IE..
<1> God.
<0> could someone make sure the menus and previews work fine in IE on this page?
<1> sure
<0> http://linkleaf.com/index.php?folder=4038
<1> stupid ajax
<0> should be some pretty sweet ajax effects if its working
<0> heh
<1> effects? Oh dear lord
<1> you have succumb to the dark side
<0> indeed i have
<1> ok how do I test these effects?
<0> does it work though? most of the effects should have sliding or fading animations
<0> click on the action buttons
<0> and then click preview
<1> OH GOD IT BURNS IT BURNS!@$!@
<1> So.. much.. sliding..
<1> for no..reason..
<0> hahaha
<0> there's a reason
<0> makes fitting all the UI peices a lot easier... otherwise there would be lots of clutter
<1> Yeah makes it easier :P
<1> lol
<1> im not saying you shouldnt have it drop down
<2> hmm
<1> just that effects are a waste of everyones time
<2> how do i change text with javascript
<3> it's cool... but will get old real quick...
<2> label?
<1> Sean|: object.text.value = omghi
<0> eh.. they waste a bit of time while the JS is off fetching the data
<3> just my opinion...
<1> label? haha you vb whore
<2> heh
<2> ive never done it with js
<2> i havent used vb in years
<0> if i didn't have the sliding and fading effects the page would just sit there while waiting for the preview to load
<2> and theres a label html attrib ;\
<0> and then the users gonna think its not workin
<0> heh
<1> lol
<0> maybe i should use like an animated gif though...
<1> that sounds fairly reasonible
<1> but id still use a loading image/text..
<1> personally
<2> Hajuu, any idea?
<0> i do use loading text... it just happens to slide into place :P
<1> Sean|: object.text.value = omghi
<2> object can be a div?
<1> Or something.
<2> or just imputs
<1> um
<2> IN
<2> PUTS
<1> not sure
<1> check w3schools
<4> Hajuu sorry.. i just went to smoke.. well.. i guess your right.. i was here 14 hours ago.. LOL
<4> whats that?
<1> It makes you leave the computer
<1> for the rest of the day
<1> lol
<4> hahahaa..
<5> Ugh this cl*** is getting large, up to 536 lines of code.
<4> i just go off the computer when its night time.. when i go to beerhouse's
<1> _PhAnTaSm: Jesus ****ing lord.
<1> lol
<4> beerhouse's
<1> mmm.. beer...
<4> _PhAnTaSm thats huge.. LOL
<5> Its mostly sql.
<5> Just a ****load of methods.
<1> Ok. Anyone know if Mineral Turpentine is a non-polar solvent?
<4> heehhee..
<1> my www isnt working
<5> Heh page gen is still sub .001 seconds.
<1> What exactly is a cfm?
<5> Cold Fusion.
<1> ew
<1> GOD DAMN. Some books are so expensive
<1> "The HPLC Solvents guide, 2nd edition" -- $1150
<1> er
<1> $115
<6> Beautiful cold fusion :)
<3> I wish there was a cfm to php converter, heh....
<6> but cfm is sooooo goooo
<6> :)
<7> write one in python just so you cover all the bases
<3> ya, but all I could afford was cold fusion xpress ;)
<1> Crap I found a really good solvent guide a while back.. cant find it again
<7> so who wants to waste their time teaching me php while I build a site?
<1> ...
<1> Well when you put it like that..
<0> oh yeah... incase anyone here didn't know... iframes ****
<3> thanks for that update ;)
<3> how to convert cfm files to php: rename all files to .php and set the web server to parse .php files
<3> as coldfusion
<0> lol
<1> ...
<0> yeah... um... i missed the conversion part
<0> :P
<1> Someone PLEASE find out if mineral turpentine is a non-polar solvent
<1> I even said PLEASe
<3> hajuu: http://www.laboratorytalk.com/news/sti/sti100.html
<1> my www isnt working
<1> so whats the go?
<3> DMP is soluble in non-polar solvents such as alkanes, cyclohexane, and even mineral turpentine
<3> but if you DO blow yourself up, I take no responsiblity...
<1> ...
<1> Theres not even any heat, let alone flame or spark involved
<1> and its kept in sealed contaners
<1> so dont be a bitch :P
<8> Why is this place +p ?
<1> to keep you out
<1> now out.
<9> hm so:
<9> flush();
<9> header("..."
<9> php: no thanks you ****
<1> ...
<1> actual errors are useful.
<8> heheh
<9> if you do a new php file <? flush(); header("Location: http://google.com";); ?>
<9> you will get a headers sent error
<9> now
<9> try debugging that in 10k lines of code
<10> Hmmmmm lets say I have a test for development boxes
<10> for my website
<10> I need to test what other users see and I have live db data
<10> so what I'm thinking
<10> is doing
<10> if (P***wordMatch($txtP***word)) || ( DevBox() ) && ($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] == '127.0.0.1'))
<10> to allow authentication
<10> is that a horrible idea?L
<10> or should I just build in an ability to switch user
<11> SJr, prob better to to use an if condition and a constant.
<10> contstat with?
<11> like define("AUTH_TYPE", "dev"); if (AUTH_TYPE == "dev") { //skip permissions } else { check permission }
<11> then server side, change that constant.
<11> in the end, remove the entire thing.
<11> its better to have something that can't change during the script to test against when it comes to security.
<10> hmmmmm
<10> fair enough
<11> you can spook that remote address, and the DevBox() function would mean chaning a whole block of code each time you want to test.
<10> really you can spoof that ?
<10> well the DevBox really is just an echo of hostname and seeing if its in an array
<10> of dev machines
<11> oh i see, ok that could work. both pose no real security risk, because you'll remove both once you go live.
Return to
#php
or
Go to some related
logs:
lebnigth
gozoina
#windows
huffing alcohol
#php
makeswebsites
#apache
klit dalnet
most common russian trivia
#linux
|
|