| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Comments:
<0> so i use a seperate 500usd ide just for xml work
<0> rrrrright
<1> nah for the JS and xml..
<1> anyways, intelliJ is the best java IDE
<1> so its not only for JS hehe
<2> lol position in que for WoW test realm, 3561
<3> Hmmmmm
<3> if my string is simply spaces
<3> why doesn't trim nullify it
<3> or atleast change the length
<0> how would that help
<3> irzyxel?
<4> $foo = preg_replace('/\s+/', ' ', trim($foo)); inside and out
<0> it would still be an empty string
<0> so how would that be helpful
<5> hello
<3> irzyxel well no
<5> I have a simple php mail script
<5> it has this: $ar=array("0"=>"o","1"=>"c","2"=>".","3"=>"g","4"=>"@","5"=>"m","6"=>"r","7"=>"s","8"=>"a","9"=>"h","10"=>"i","11"=>"w","12"=>"l");
<5> what does this mean?
<0> its your script, shouldnt you know ?
<3> irzyxel well no
<5> I downloaded it sir
<3> I have a string like
<3> " a"
<3> and trim returns
<3> " a"
<3> errr
<3> " a"
<0> l0aded: you didnt read the topic, http://php.net/manual/en/function.array.php
<3> OMG I'm retarded
<0> not sure what its about, but i agree
<3> lol
<3> the reason it wasn't working
<3> is because I was editing the wrong function :P
<3> BING
<3> BINGO
<3> DWism
<3> you there?
<6> YEp
<6> What's up?
<4> my penis!
<6> Eldritch: TMI, kthz
<6> :)
<4> want to come sit in my lap?
<6> I'll p***, really.
<3> DWism remember the library thing you said
<3> I have a developer problem
<6> yeah
<3> lets say I have a function call
<3> GetAllUsers()
<3> but I need only specific users with a certain property
<6> uhm
<6> searchUsers? :)
<3> no hold on
<3> Now I could take my GetAllUsers() and use the information in there and filter out in PHP
<3> or I could write another function very similar to GetAllUsers with the property I want.
<6> why that would be wasteful and inefficient
<6> the database should do the filtering
<3> hmmmm
<3> but then I'll have a bazillion Library Functions doing next to the same thing.
<6> then write a multi-function? :)
<6> I know, I'm billiant. :)
<3> You mean write a function that can search...
<3> hmmmmm
<6> searchUsers($fields, $conditions, $values)
<3> Hmmmmmm
<3> and those would be SQL Strings I guess?
<6> roughly
<6> one would be an array of fields
<6> one an array of conditions
<6> one n array of values
<6> :D
<3> hmmm but a function like that removes the abstraction doesn't it?
<2> *cough*database abstraction*cough*
<6> yes and no
<6> searching well requires bending abstraction a bit anyway
<6> one other option
<6> would be to keep an object-to-db mapping
<6> and p*** an object of the proper type to the search function
<6> like a search prototype
<3> Hmmmmm
<6> and any value that is default is considered not searched by
<3> I wonder how many queries one page requires to load now?
<6> so you'd do libUser::searchUsersByPrototype($user_proto);
<6> and $user_proto would look like...
<6> $user_proto = new User(); $user_proto->permissions = PERMS_ADMIN;
<6> or something
<3> hmmmmm
<3> wow
<3> your permission system is so different :P
<6> yes
<3> then again I don't really have a user object
<6> mine is logical and cool
<6> and well thought out :D
<3> excuse me
<3> mine is too :P
<3> LibPerm::CheckPerm('perm_string')
<6> Yours hasn't been refined for 2+ years, no? :)
<3> is just as good
<6> ugh
<3> :P
<6> strings
<6> puke
<6> :D
<3> actually I think It's been refinded over 2 hours
<3> and then I haven't done anything since
<3> lol
<6> defines, hooked to binary values
<6> role-based permission sets
<6> action based permissions
<6> :D
<3> Hmmmmmm
<3> Different actions / views require different permissions.
<3> and permissions can be either team, subteam, or user based
<6> soon I will build some form of introspection and move the permissions system to be fully managed online
<3> oh you mean your permissions are loaded from file?
<6> currently
<6> but then
<6> permissions are set in the files too
<3> hmmmmm
<6> for the action's required permission
<6> so it makes no sense to set up perms in the DB when you have to edit files to change action permissions anyway
<3> action permissions?
<6> but if they're both web controllable, that's cool too
<0> http://www.sun.com/x64/benchmarkbrawl/
<6> funtion calls will be permission aware, in the library, inherently
<6> I can group function calls into actions
<6> and actions to permissions
<3> nice
<3> I've been thinking of adding some permission checks into the Library functionsa
<3> as right now they are just above the library
<3> libraries
<3> which sorta bothers me
<7> hm
<2> DCC SEND "1234567891011"
<2> no steve :(
<3> wow
<3> 7542 lines of code
<6> for?
<3> my project
<3> that includes html tho
<3> which ****s
<3> hmmmmm
<3> 5896 approximately are not HTML
<3> and by that I mean
<3> 5896 do not contain a <
<3> my libraries 1707
<0> iuuuh, anyone got plesk 8 beta ?
<8> plesk ****s gonads
<0> and you use instead ?
Return to
#php
or
Go to some related
logs:
IN: refresh: non-authoritative answer from master +0.0.0.0
#linuxhelp
is not in the DOCUMENT_ROOT
impregnate my mom
qalbi/ london
installing application on linux
What African peak is known as The Mountain of the Cold Devils ?
netsnmp_udp_transport +stack smashing
wyldroze
Sabryna Chase
|
|