@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2



Comments:

<0> Hello
<1> Hallo.
<0> Would someone be willing to test my ftp, see if you can connect?
<2> I cant --- dialup. Sorry.
<3> Naturlich, c-76-18-202-67.hsd1.fl.comcast.net
<0> What does having dialup have to do with it?
<2> ach so...
<3> =)
<2> I already got full bandwith load with ubuntu update
<0> yeah thats my ip ;)
<3> Well, it's your hostname
<0> So intuitive, would you be willing to give it a try?
<2> it's Intuitive
<2> with I



<4> 530-Account does not exist. Name[anonymous]
<4> 530 closing control connection.
<0> yeah i
<0> cool
<4> please dont private message me if you dont have reason
<4> help is in the help channel
<2> Willam0: you should enable annonymus connections so we can all rape your 21 port apart!
<0> Aciduzzu - it won't be running on 21 for long, just wanted to make sure I did the port mapping correctly.
<2> too bad - I like remote penetrations on default ports...:P
<0> somehow I don't think you could penetrate a wet paperbag ;)
<2> need a demonstration? it should take some time so please enable annonymus connection and leave the box open and unpatched to make it shorter ... :P
<4> Aciduzzu: he's asking for help, not pentesting
<0> But ***ured if I was asking for penetration testing I'd look for someone other than a script kiddie.
<2> I was just kidding guys!
<2> and I thought I was tired...
<0> Your jokes are tired.
<0> Well, thanks for the help, have a good night.
<3> hi geekgirl :)
<5> hi
<3> hiya
<6> yo
<6> what's the difference between l3/l4 routing and MLS?
<6> multi layer switching
<6> looks pretty similar to me
<6> mls is like l3/l4 RIB lookup + cef/fast switching
<6> mozzie!
<6> figured it out if somebody is interested
<3> do tell
<6> i.e.
<6> Multilayer switching (MLS), which represents an older Layer 3 switching technology used on older Catalyst switches and then learn about CEF-based Layer 3 switching, which is the current Layer 3 switching technology used on all next-generation Cisco Layer 3 switches (e.g., Catalyst 3550, Catalyst 4000/4500 Supervisor 3/4, and Catalyst 6000/6500 Supervisor 2 with PFC-2 + MSFC-2).
<6> so MLS is kinda 'pre CEF'
<6> less intelligent CEF
<7> you've got cat6k's
<7> they do mls
<6> also a bit confused of the nature of trunk in routers
<6> they do both mls/cef
<7> cat6k's got hidden trunks between pfc and the msfc
<6> msfc2a does cef
<6> look
<6> cat6k can work with trunk in 2 modes:
<6> 1. switchport trunk blah blah on int
<6> then u create several int vlan xxx and so on
<7> you might be talking about mac rewrite thing
<6> wait
<7> came accross a good cat6k/7600 architechture document last week
<6> this mode is well understood, working like a trivial 3560/3750 etc
<6> but
<7> yeah
<6> mode 2 is:
<6> 2. routed port with subints
<7> inter-vlan routing
<6> e.g. no ip address
<7> i'm doing that
<6> and then u do subints
<6> exactly
<7> yeah
<6> but how to treat it?
<6> as a trunk switched or routed?
<7> on msfc you treat them like real interfaces
<6> it's not swtiched
<6> but it does vlans



<7> on the pfc.. you treat them like vlan trunks
<6> so it's liek a conjunction of switchport trunk + int vlan
<6> rigtt?
<7> say on pfc you ***ign port 1 in vlan x
<7> then ***ign port 2 in vlan y
<7> on the msfc, you'll put something like this
<7> int vlan 1
<7> ip address blah blah
<7> int vlan 2
<7> ip address halb halb
<6> but I am talking about 1 trunk link with many subints
<6> yeah
<7> then the switch will do it's thing
<7> you can ***ign multiple ports into 1 vlan
<6> I know
<7> and point the hosts into a single gw
<6> but now I am talking about multiple vlans in 1 port
<7> that's ***igned to the vlan interface
<7> trunk port you mean?
<6> I know commands but now I just wanna figure out how it works
<6> exactly
<7> still
<7> you treat them much like you do on regular cats
<6> cos to me trunk port with subints looks like switchport trunk + IP vlan termination
<7> key is.. on the msfc.. you ***ign which vlan interface gets a subnet
<6> yes but
<6> it's understood
<7> if i could illustrate further..
<7> say you've got a cat
<7> cat3k
<6> but when it's routed port with subints - it can't further bridge vlans
<6> to other trunks
<7> cat3k port 1 ----> cat6k port1
<6> yes
<7> this becomes a trunk
<6> let's say we got it in no switchport on both sides
<7> host 1 on cat3k is on vlan1
<7> host 2 on cat 3k is on vlan 2
<7> right?
<6> aight but again, let's treat them as no int vlan xxx
<6> just suints both sides
<6> subints
<7> there's got to be a vlan interface on the cat6k
<6> why?
<7> so regardless which switch these hosts connects to..
<7> there would be connectivity
<6> I can set 3k's port to switchport trunk
<6> and then no int vlan but subints on 6k
<7> unless you just want bridging.. then, there's no need for inter-vlan routing
<6> it will work
<7> same subnets?
<7> i don't think so
<6> different subnets different subints
<6> cat 6k side
<6> int gi 5/8.999
<6> ip add 1.1.1.1 xxxx
<7> there's got to be some sort of inter-vlan routing
<6> int gi 5/8.998
<6> ip add 2.2.2.2
<6> etc
<6> yes cat6k will do intervlan rotuing
<6> between vlans
<7> exactly
<6> but how to treat such port kind?
<6> as routed only?
<6> but it understands tagged dot1q traffic too
<6> with subints
<6> i.e.
<6> int gi 5/8
<6> no ip add
<6> int gi 5/8.999
<6> encap dot1q 999
<6> ip add 7.7.7 x.x.x.x
<7> yes.. in cat6k terms.. it's called switching through MAC re-write


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #networking
or
Go to some related logs:

e bay englend
#linux
#london
#java
glicoza
gmplayer +seek failed
#AllNiteCafe
#chatzone
#linux
#linux



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes