| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> they're squeezing the drops ..
<0> i think google will take a fall soon though
<0> they're allowing all these shady businesses to earn money from really fishy sites
<1> wonder how much i can get for tyson.homeunix.org. ;D
<2> if you find any, report it..
<2> beebum: lol
<0> as a advertiser i dont see why i'd like to pay for such traffic, and as a publisher i dont see why advertisers would continue to pay me for ads via the content network
<0> K_F, whats the point of reporting a adsense premium partner to adsense?
<0> in my refererr list i have like 50-60 domains that are all typos of known domains or just keyword optimized parked domains
<2> premium partner or domain parking?
<2> those are different programs
<0> they are basiclly there or four different templates
<2> and they pay differently
<0> i dont know the difference
<0> godaddy for instance?
<2> http://www.google.com/domainpark/
<0> w
<0> www.fun.com
<0> http://ebumsworld.com/
<0> etc
<0> plenty of them are from godaddy.com
<0> (not any of those)
<0> it pisses me off in so many ways.. :p
<2> fun.com doesn't seem to be google though
<2> nor does the other one
<0> it is
<0> they're premium
<0> click a link and check where it redirects
<0> if you copy a link, telnet to fun.com 80 and do a get link http/1.0
<0> you'll get a adsense-url
<0> they're just cloaking it
<0> premium partenrs get those advantages, you can subscribe to a feed or something instead of a javascript
<0> it's evil in several ways..
<0> mostly because adsense gives them content ..
<0> genereating even more traffic
<2> actually it is a direct API
<2> SOAP thingie
<0> ah ok
<0> well, whatever.. it ****s no matter what
<0> google is financing all these useless no-content spam domains
<0> yahoo will salvage us
<0> i bought a couple of yahoo stock actually. they're releasing their network to the public soon
<2> hehe
<2> Microsoft did already
<2> and still I get virtually no traffic and no revenue...
<0> hmm
<0> not the same thing?
<0> microsoft doesnt allow third party publishers yet
<0> only on their search engine
<0> which only morons use
<0> i think ive had to much coffee :(
<1> i've gotten more hits by posting to mailing lists than anything
<2> no, it is public now
<1> of course i don't use adsense, nor do i have content anyone is interested it
<2> http://advertising.msn.com/microsoft-adcenter/
<2> "To get started, all you need is $5 for a one-time signup fee and a credit card to create Microsoft adCenter account."
<2> uhm, wait, that is the adwords equivalent
<0> K_F, yeah but for me as a publisher
<2> yeah, they won't go adsense
<2> just a bad wire here
<0> i think they will
<0> in due time
<0> yahoo spent two years developing afaik
<2> well, but they haven't announced it yet
<0> just to get up to speed
<0> knowing microsofts usual success in keeping things to schedule they're prolly launching somewhere around 2010
<2> hehe
<0> the boring thing about writing technical stuff is that you need to know what you're writing bout :p
<0> so the specialist has to waste time writing
<0> instead of the indian
<0> :P
<2> if the ads pays the domain registration it gets renewed, if it doesn't it expires
<2> and that is the philosophy for now..
<0> put it on sedo a couple of months before
<0> for a couple of hundred bucks or soo
<2> well, so far it pays the domain registration..
<3> Is there a way to backup your SQL table?
<3> like convert it to some txt file
<3> ah nm
<4> hi!
<4> where on a linux machine can i find something like a mysqld config file?
<2> wherever you put it
<2> now RTFM
<4> i didn't set up the server
<4> just the idiot who has to fix it.
<4> btw, thanks for the competent answer.
<1> lol, anyone "competent" shouldn't have to ask that question. ;D
<2> He never claimed to be competent.
<2> Just an insult.
<5> hello
<5> is it good design to have a table for users info and another table for corresponding user website info or should I do one table that has all these info?
<6> if user info is not that much updated often and website info is updated often. then its better to separate them.
<5> okay thank you
<7> hi ppl
<7> im writing a script to output a number of urls, i know the total of rows by using the count() function, but the script ouput not all the rows, because the primary key is higher, any advice how i can correct this
<8> SELECT * from foo
<7> eldritch: i dont think you understand
<7> want me to explain?
<8> you can if you want to
<7> ok
<7> there 463 rows, i use the primary key to count how many line to output, but meanwhile i deleted 2 rows so the primary is 465, due to this the scripts forgets to ouput 2 rows
Return to
#mysql
or
Go to some related
logs:
Regular Expression.pdf
#c++
mur ahra
arial.ttf ubuntu
X-YahooFilteredBulk postfix
#c++
ubuntu enlightnment
state receives the least sunshine
#gentoo
php substr mit endposition
|
|