@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10



Comments:

<0> Viking667 you forgot girls.that.go.with.it
<0> hiya longword
<1> hello i need help
<0> well you gonna have to come up with questions :)
<2> ***.I.love.it=
<3> I use an NFS server and I set the /etc/exports file to read/write mode, and I still can't write on that partition...can someone tell me why ?
<1> who i can instal one server Counter Strike in linux ?
<4> Scream-: probably permission problem
<3> T`aZ: what permission problems ? They say that u can set the permission of the filex exported in /etc/exports and I typed rw in there
<4> Scream-: check which user is trying to write to the share, and wheck if that user (the _same_ UID) has acces on the nfs server
<4> Scream-: yes, but then, standart unix permissions still apply
<3> T`aZ: not even root can do it
<4> that's because by default root is remapped to nobody or something similar :)
<3> and what's the solution ?
<3> :)



<4> add no_root_squash
<1> who i can instal one server Counter Strike in linux ????
<4> but, that's a BIG ? GIGANTIC secutiry risk
<4> it means, that ANYONE , who has root on HIS box, has root acces on YOUR nfs server
<3> damn them, there are only 2 machines and I'm root on both of them,
<3> :)
<4> so, i suggest you do *not* use that option (unless you know what you are doing), and check the permission of the files/dir for the 'world' part
<5> hello
<4> byebye :p
<5> bye
<4> hey no,stay, it's was a stupid non funny joke :p
<5> oh, i thought you were leaving
<3> T`aZ: I did it and still cant write on it :)
<4> Scream-: rerun exprotfs -rav ?
<3> I restarted the whole NFS server
<4> Scream-: maybe you need to start/stop the nfs daemon/client , umount./remount , i dont know which part is necessary :p
<4> (exportfs even)
<3> I also umounted and remounted :)
<4> added the no_root_squash ? , and tryed as root in the client ?
<3> T`aZ: I've done it...I added the squash option to another partition :))
<3> damn hurry :))
<3> 10x a lot
<4> np :p
<3> T`aZ:
<3> what do u mean that anyone who has root on his box has root acc on my NFS server ?
<3> I mean I allow only one IP adress to mount that partition
<2> Right. I'm outta here.
<4> Scream-: its because the nfs (by default) maps the uers of the client to the server
<4> Scream-: so, it the client says 'hey i'm root' , the nfs server will check if root has acces on the files
<3> and ?
<4> there isn't even p***word/logging involved
<3> what can happen ?
<3> the server will respond with NO
<3> cause u dont have that IP adress
<6> Uh, you do know that's what root_quash is for, yes?
<4> suppose one machine has acces to the lan, it steals your nfs client'ip , and voila , he can do rm -rf /nfsshare
<3> aaaah yes yes
<3> so what can I do to make it more secure ?
<3> :)
<4> nfs over ssh
<3> what do u mean by that ?
<6> What all_squash is for, rather.
<6> Not root_squash.
<4> the auth is realised by ssh, and THAT is secure
<4> Scream-: but i've never done it myself, i dont really know how it works
<6> Using all_squash, you can guarantee what UID/GID gets used when someone connects.
<6> T`aZ: NFS over SSH is fun because NFS usually uses random ports.
<4> yeah, that's probably the reason i dont want to read about that :p
<3> T`aZ: but as long as that "someone" doesnt have the IP adress that I suggsested that there's nothing wrong isnt it ?
<4> yeah
<4> but it's trivial to find an ip adress of a box, if you are conected to the lan
<3> T`aZ: in my town everybody who uses linux are the so called "hackers/crackers" or whatever the hell they are :))
<3> I wont have prblems with that
<7> conquest: gethostbyname(): cannot get localhost info. <---- I get this sometimes when I try to run certain programs. I have hostname set, so why is this happening?
<3> and I'll only use that option if I want "rw" access
<3> as soon as I write what I need, I`m gonna change the options and that`s it
<4> what about using scp if writing is occasional ?
<4> you can even mount ssh 'stuff' with fuse
<3> or sftp ?
<4> probably too
<3> 10x anyway



<3> :)
<5> hey, i know this will sound stupid, but, what do you do with a .run file?
<8> run 'file' against it.
<6> Probably follow the instructions it came with.
<8> Usually it's an executable.
<8> That, too.
<6> Let us guess... you downloaded the nVidia binary driver package, but didn't think you should read the instructions.
<5> alright, it didnt come with instructions and i tried doing run 'file'
<5> nope! ati
<6> Same difference.
<5> yeah
<5> i guess so
<6> Of course, there are perfectly readable instructions.
<5> perhaps
<5> ill look
<8> Hrm.. this Vonage Softphone is kinda neat.
<8> 'specially when my cell phone is fscking broken.
<7> mwilson: That was still a very good guess.
<6> simplex: Not really difficult. Not too many things are distributed that way... and ***uming that a cluebie thinks he's too special to read the instructions is always a safe bet.
<9> hi is there any way to get x0vncserver w/o vnc? i have tightvnc already is why
<9> actually real prob is tightvnc is not letting me remote into display :0, so i read x0 makes this possible
<9> but i can only find x0 in vnc rpm's etc
<9> and i cant install vnc if i already have tightvnc
<6> "not letting you"? It's not *supposed* to. It's not *written* to.
<9> i know but there are workarounds, and those did not work ... around.
<9> its in the vnc faq
<9> mwilson perhaps you know a better solution to the real problem though:
<9> when a user calls and says please show me how to change X pref in firefox, i want to remote into the pc and show them while they watch.
<9> as far as i know, i need to remote into :0 display to do this.
<9> that this their display when they login via gdm/gnome
<6> Uhh, you *do* know that Gnome already incorporates a VNC server?
<9> yes but tightvnc is better for me (ssh ready); ie no need to do the vnc over ssh part manually
<9> and from what i've read tightvnc is generally better
<9> i already know the vnc fc4 comes with can do what i need to but its not via tightvnc
<6> "Better" than what? It doesn't do what you want it to do, it can't do what you want it to do, so how is it "better"? What's built into Gnome, on the other hand, works and does what you want it to do.
<8> mogadishu, ignore mwilson, he'll just bitch and moan all day. Very rarely will he spout out a real answer from that big mouth of his.
<6> danq: Yes, of course... my mistake. Using what's built-in is certainly no sort of answer whatsoever.
<9> ok whatever, anyway the goal is remoting into an :0 display but over ssh
<8> If he doesn't want to use it, the answer is worthless. You knew that before attempting to think about maybe possibly but not really because you're a douchebag-answering it.
<8> Ah well, time to try to be productive. bbl, and good luck, mogadishu.
<9> ok ok we can debate his d.b. status later, any ideas on how to accomplish the goal though
<9> mwilson i'd rather use vnc but everything i read says tightvnc is better and using it over ssh seems to be far easier than vnc
<6> I would imagine getting the built-in to run over an SSH tunnel to be a non-issue, but hey, apparently it's no sort of answer. Knock yourself out.
<9> fine whatever.
<9> another question: i have a corrupted tar apparently, i did bzip2recover, it made unique tar files but none of which i can untar because unexpected EOF.
<9> original tar was bzipped
<9> how can i recover/unarchive these tar files?
<9> or perhaps extract from bzip file ignoring the corrupt file/portion?
<10> Nope.
<9> longword nope as in i've lost the data for good?
<10> Every bit in the archive depends on all the bits that preceed it
<10> That's a bzip thing rather than tar
<9> ok so any hope of salvaging anything?
<10> tar can skip blocks, if you know the block size (tyically 10k)
<10> You can use dd to skip blocks
<10> But if the underlying compression is corrupt, the odds are not good
<9> dd is a bunzip option?
<0> is it friday yet....
<0> i want my bsg....
<11> how do I make apache use SSL on certain .php files?
<12> how do you get information about a user
<13> EGhozt, you go about "hello user, asl?"
<0> zephyr ssl has nothing to do with file extention, ssl works on port 443 (by default)
<11> Redragon^, than how can I enable SSL to a certain page ?
<0> well if your using php you can test the url and if its not https you can rewrite the url to https
<0> i do the same thing with perl
<11> so I just have to change http to https ?
<0> yup
<11> cool.
<11> :D
<11> how do I enable https on my web server?
<11> is there a program that supports web cam ?
<11> Meaning like Yahoo messanger with WebCam ..
<14> have you tried...google?


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #linuxhelp
or
Go to some related logs:

vidcaptures
No bots in the configfile
winsconsin zipcode
WHAT EUROPEAN CITY BOASTS THE PRADO
#c++
#windows
1130 host in not allowed to connect fedora
#slice
#asm
linux z800i



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes