| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> yeha thatnx, danq gave me something like that
<0> thanx
<0> anyony of you program in Python
<0> I've been learnign for a while
<0> but sockets are giving me hell
<0> anyonyE*
<0> learning*
<1> Hey guys...I just did a fresh install of centos 4.3 on a new laptop...everything works fine except wireless...i have an intel 3945 card...according to the website i need to update my kernel to at least 2.6.13 whereas the latest kernel available for CentOS is 2.6.9...what are my options here...if I do a manual upgrade is this going to mess up things from this point forward in terms of accessing yum?
<2> Probably.
<2> Can you use ndiswrapper?
<1> that's a shame...i guess i'll just have to live without it for a while
<1> i thought ndiswrapper was for the ibm drivers only, not hte intel ones? i haven't looked into it much honestly
<2> I've never hearrd of ndiswrapper working for specific manufacturers...
<1> ahh ok, i'll do some research about it
<2> Wouldn't hurt to post on the centos list
<1> true, there was one post on the centos forums...however it was just around 8 posts and the last post was something along the lines of "i guess i'll wait until the next released of CentOS"
<2> hehe
<1> i'm a little more determined than that but now that i have everything configured correctly and my software installed i don't want to mess things up
<2> yeah.
<2> If you change the kernel, you will be shunned for future support, for sure.
<2> People tend to be bitchy about that especially, due to the nature of how RHEL and CentOS actually "work"
<4> I just converted 2 drives to software raid 1 and now cat /proc/mdstat is saying md0 : active raid1 hdh1[2] hdg1[1] 293049600 blocks [2/1] [_U] [=>...................] recovery = 5.8% (17141248/293049600) finish=250.8min speed=18331K/sec, is that normal?
<4> is it normal for it to take 250mins to reconstruct one hd even if it's empty?
<2> yes
<4> ok thanks, just making sure ;)
<2> How big are the disks?
<4> 300gb each
<2> yeah
<2> a long while heh
<4> I know I'm getting impatient ;)
<2> heh
<4> and how can I check if the raid works? I don't want to need it and see it wasn't working all along.
<5> copy a bunch of files to the array
<4> and then unplug one hd
<4> and then how do I check? just go to the directory to see if the file's still there?
<2> I would not suggest unplugging it...
<5> that's a good question
<2> might want to turn the machine off, then unplug it heh
<2> is it a boot drive?
<4> no it's not
<2> ok, then turn the machine off, unplug a drive, then fire it bac up
<4> danq don't worry, that's what I'm gonna do :)
<2> ok :)
<2> I'm not worried, it's your machine
<2> heh
<4> and then go to the array to see if the file's there?
<2> yes
<2> read /var/log/messages, dmesg, etc etc.
<2> ./proc/mdstat
<4> perfect
<4> and to reconstruct when something happens,
<4> I just plug the new hd in and it starts reconstructing it automatically?
<2> I believe so.
<2> Not too keen on how RAID is handled, unfortunately.
<2> But you best learn stuff like that form just playing around with it
<2> I do, anyway.
<4> yeah, I'm just testing it right now, I unplugged the hd that contains important data, just in case.
<6> some one is breaking in to my machine by httpd-2.0.40-21.i386.rpm , what should i do ?
<4> I don't want to type /dev/hde instead of /dev/hdh and lose all my data :p
<2> how do you know this, yoyo
<6> becose he is talking with me
<2> who?
<6> he talks with me by wall
<4> yoyo reinstall
<2> haha what doeshe say
<6> the guy who broked in
<4> do the upgrades and go back online
<2> why did you say httpd-2.0.40-21.i386.rpm
<6> he told that 2.0.40 is bugged
<6> the apache version
<2> cool.
<4> yoyo: reinstall, do the updates, go back online.
<4> ok another question guys: when I check mdadm --detail /dev/md0, it says active sync /dev/hdg1 spare /dev/hdh1
<4> so hdh1 copies hdg1?
<4> I'm asking this question for fstab, what do I add for mount point
<4> for lets say /home, do I add /dev/dhg1 or /dev/md0
<7> Anyone played much with ImageMagick or something similar?
<4> yoyo: you can't do much, you'll have to contact your sysadmin
<6> ok , thnx
<7> I've got a handful of .gif's with white background and I'd like them to be transparent... any chance of creating some batch process for this?
<8> convert might be able to handle it
<7> if the darn man page wouldn't be huge
<4> "convert -transparent white"
<7> now that's handy
<4> " -transparent color make this color transparent within the image"
<4> convert --help miracles ;)
<7> are you sure it accepts "white"?
<4> no, just taking a guess.
<7> that's fair
<7> now if I could freakin' sleep I wouldn't have to play with Skins for my phone =/
<8> suppose as long as there is no white within the actual image
<7> that's what I'm checking now =/
<8> if it's just a handful, must be easier to do it manually with gimp
<7> 206 pics, I wouldn't call that a handfull =/
<7> 15x15px and 33x33px
<7> 41x41, 43x43
<7> <g>
<7> hope the bloody Skin will at least look right
<9> /usr/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s 84.22.98.0/23?dport 6667 -j SOCKS4?proxy=tor.cb3rob.net:9050 << can you do this? redirect trafic to socks?
<8> Znuff: well, you did. :P
<7> don't know if *SOCKS4?proxy=* is valid
<7> but imho, that looks like a bad idea
<7> 9050, hmmm, isn't that TOR?
<9> Znuff I don't think that is possible
<9> yea
<7> why don't you use torify?
<7> or tsocks-whatever-is-it-called?
<9> I'm just reading a comment and i can't figure out if the guy is suggestion that or you can do that
<7> oh, wait, you want users behind the lan to use tor
<7> can I have a look?
<9> well, all i wam trying to do is redirect data through a socks server- nothing to do with tor
<9> want*
<9> am**
<7> well, yeah, but tor runs on 9050 by default, so I've kind of figured out what you're trying to do :-)
<9> yea
<9> tor does
<9> the point i was getting at is the data is being redirected through tor
<9> err- through a socks server
<7> where did you get that example from?
<9> http://ardoino.altervista.org/blog/index.php?id=42
<9> at the bottom
<8> yah, torify would seem to be much simpler
<9> you know i'm not trying to use tor
<7> yeah, a regular socks proxy
<9> :) hehe-
<7> I get it
<9> ok
<9> yea, cause i don't want to send my data through random servers
<9> point is to send my data through a specific socks server
<7> well, that example should work, provided that you patch your kernel
<9> aww
<9> that's what i was avoiding
<7> hmm, watia sec.
<9> :)
<7> checked this, acad? http://sourceforge.net/projects/transocks/
<9> yes
<9> hehe went to download nothing existed
<9> looking elsewhere for it
<7> well
<7> We don't currently distribute binaries, so you will have to compile TranSocks yourself. The source code can be downloaded from anonymous CVS.
<9> annoying
<7> looks like your only chance :)
<9> :) if i knew it would work this might not be that bad
<9> and i do like to see the source code but.. after i know it works
<7> holy mother of convert
<7> how does a .gif increase from 1.2k to 899k?!
<9> i give up, how?
<7> I'd actually love to know that myself
<9> aww- ok
<9> i hate ms windows
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#javascript
ST3250824AS settings linux
#linux
#linux
#skype
bootdisk iso fdisk
#linuxhelp
kif iggerrieh?
gm chatzone
#linux
|
|