| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> how much ?
<1> 1299
<1> that's $
<1> from apple.com
<1> here it sould be around 1300 E ( taxes too )
<1> and since i buy without VAT. i`d get it at about ... 1100E
<0> damn you =/
<1> well i won't buy it in the near future.
<1> maybe next month if i'm lucky.
<0> that doesn't make me too happy
<1> Znuff: why don't you get an iPod Color 60GB ?
<1> and put ipodlinux on it and it supports uncompressed avi's
<1> it's not a video one, but what the heck?
<1> ofcourse i think that 120 mins of uncompressed avi are like 4GB
<0> I'd rather use a PDA than a video iPod
<1> but size doesn't count, does it?
<0> no
<1> why is that?
<0> actually 4GB is at top 10 minutes
<1> no.
<0> Sure it is :)
<1> i had a colegue that had ipod color
<0> 320x240, 25fps
<1> and i put ipodlinux on it.
<1> a 12fps is enought.
<0> dude, trust me, 4gb = 10 minutes of raw avi
<1> and it had 2 GB
<1> 21 minutes ( one southpark episode )
<0> maybe MPEG not avi?
<1> no no, avi.
<0> can't be raw avi
<1> 12 fps, resolution lower than 320x240
<1> yes it is.
<0> that's a bad trend, I must say
<1> uhm, but why won't you use an ipod video ?
<1> and better a pda?
<1> it has 20hours of battery life if playing non-stop.
<0> on one side we're strugling to get hdtv on the go, with huge resolutions, and the portable video players just go down, down, down
<1> actually mine's got 17
<0> why watching videos on tiny displays ?
<0> with extremly low resolutions/
<1> not extremely low resolutions.
<1> it has a TV Out feature.
<0> 320x240?
<1> no, the exact resolutions of the avi you are converting.
<1> ( since it needs mp4 to work )
<0> a?
<1> it just has to be proportional to the screens size.
<0> what size is the dysplay of a iPod video?
<0> 1.5" ?
<1> guess so, i don't know
<0> that says it all
<0> I think the maximum resolution is 320x240 for movies on iPod video
<1> 2.5
<0> I know that's how they sell videos on iTunes
<1> no, since it has tv out you can put videos of higher resolution
<1> but i don't know what itunes sells.
<0> iTunes sells "Lost" at 320x240
<1> well i don't buy from itunes. :)
<0> iPod is great for music, but imho, it should stick at music
<0> I love iPod shuffle
<0> think I'm gonna buy one when I get back to bucharest
<1> where are you now ?
<0> neptun =/
<1> oh, nice... is it sunny there?
<0> hell no =/
<0> no more sunny times :(
<1> oh, excuse me a little, i am going to go to the bathroom.
<1> that's half a kilometer from my dads bureau ( since i don't like the bathroom here )
<1> long walk.
<0> last week from sunday to wednesday it was sunny and +15 C, but yesterday it snowed again :(
<2> anyone here using firebird odbc for linux?
<3> Right, who knows how to make Moravian Spice Cookies?
<1> nobody.
<3> Surely someone here is from Moravia?
<1> hehe. i'll google now for those.
<1> still, i'm not moravian.
<1> ok, those are cookies. do you like them longword ?
<4> help please, i had windows xp installed and debian sarge 3.1 wih GRUB boot loader, i went to format the windows xp installation to put on windows 2003 server and the GRUB boot loader isnt coming up, have i lost my linux instalation?
<0> no
<0> but yoiu need to rescue it
<0> you just need to reinstall the bootloader
<5> All these people who steal W2k3 Server, but have no idea how to manage it.
<0> who the hell needs a w2k3 server?
<0> :P
<6> hi, what program should i use to view and use another linux pc as though i was sitting in front of it?
<6> vnc?
<1> yes.
<1> the xorg server has one of those clients
<5> Xorg *ships* a VNC client?
<5> Or Gnome does?
<6> should i rtfm on vnc, xorg server, or both?
<6> for this solution i mean, not in general
<1> mwilson: i think xorg.
<1> oh, the server is shipped with xorg.
<0> muchacho: there are 2 ways to use a vnc server
<1> x11vnc to be exact.
<0> I'm using Xvnc
<1> oh.
<1> i'm going out.
<5> synaptic: I really don't think so... there would be no reason for a VNC client to be part of Xorg. I do know that Gnome has this incredibly stupid idea that there should be a *user-controllable* VNC server shipped as part of 2.10 and later.
<6> Znuff 2 ways?
<1> mwilson: sorry then.
<0> yes, one is to bind a vnc server to a running x session, and the other one is to run a vnc server separately
<6> mwilson users can give access to themselves via vnc? as in non root users? via gnome. i need to block that port!
<0> there's not a defined port
<6> Znuff does bind to running mean i would be seeing the same screen and activity as the currently logged in user
<0> you can use vnc on whatever port you want
<0> muchacho: mostly, yes
<6> Znuff how does one block users from activating this then?
<6> i mean other than relying on their ignorance of it
<0> don't install a vnc server?
<6> Znuff well yeah but then i cant use either
<0> well, DOH
<0> you can install it just for yourself, in your directory for example
<0> but every user can do that too
<6> yeah ... typical security vs usability compromise
<0> if you're afraid of that, you'd better not give anyone acces to your box
<0> and that's all
<6> no no its not my box, its the others in this office
<5> muchacho: So what you're saying is that you're just a pretend admin, then?
<0> then don't bother
<6> mwilson never said i was an admin, a pretender, or any of the above, did i?
<5> muchacho: Then what're you doing making any sorts of these decisions?
<0> you said that you need to block that port, it implies being an admin
<6> well u can call me an admin then, but i dont have any formal training (obviously), mis just landed in my lap, ie small office, many hats
<5> Spell, please... we're not morons here.
<6> got it
<6> anyway if i go read about vnc it should cover configuring everything both on client and server, correct?
<6> or is there other material i should also read
<5> I've never understood Gnome adding x11vnc to their base install. Gnome's basic philosophy is "the user is stupid, and doesn't get to make decisions", and yet they're allowing the user to choose whether or not to open this security hole.
<7> Hey, got a quick question concerning RPMS... how do you setup an 'or' statement for requirements...such as Requirements: apache 'or' httpd
<6> its even in the accessories menu by default
<5> Yes, we all know that VNC runs on unprivelidged ports, and $RANDOM_USER could just compile it and drop it into $HOME, but they're *facilitating* the stupidity.
<6> does vnc run encrypted? like over on ssh tunnel or something.
<7> muchacho: you can set it up to
<3> VNC is completely unencrypted
<5> If you're smart, you do.
<3> But you can tunnel it over SSH
<5> It's how I administer the computers at the church. :)
<6> does vnc manual and docs cover running it over ssh, ie is it just a standard option in vnc?
<6> does = do
<3> Nope, you're on your own there
<6> hmmm thats what i was afraid of
<3> It's not difficult though
<3> ssh -L 5900:localhost:5900
<6> mwilson what else should i read about to accomplish something similar to your setup (vnc over ssh over internet)
<5> tightvnc client can auto-create the tunnel for you, and tear it down when it's done.
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#MissKitten
#chatzone
#MissKitten
fedora /mnt/source tty2 problem
#AllNiteCafe
mrtg + atm + flat line
#linux
What's the difference between const char* and char * const
#linux
#linux
|
|