| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> oooopen!
<0> at last
<1> you've just proven my point too, concerning windows usage :P
<2> codein?
<2> codeine?
<1> you'll probably want the latter
<0> no its just i rebuilt the config file part by part
<3> That's fun.
<3> I just lost Ubuntu.
<4> good 4 u
<3> Tried to log in and X crashed with a failure on authentication.
<1> chipko: what's with the lamer speak?
<4> m?
<1> this isn't #kiddiecentral, mind
<4> explain
<1> y 4 r u using l4m3sp3ak???!!!!!
<4> :)))))))
<1> </hint>
<4> o.0
<3> I don't understand the point of abbreviating like you might for SMS on a channel like this
<3> Letters don't cost money, and one keystroke is one letter, it's not like it takes any longer or less long.
<1> not to mention that it makes you look like an utter tit
<3> I wouldn't say tit exactly.
<3> They're pretty birds.
<1> and if you keep it up long enough that it gets on my nerves, you'll discover it's one of the less funnier ways to part form this channel
<4> :))))))
<3> Er, sorry.
<4> guys
<3> I meant, "Pretty on birds".
<4> get a life
<4> live me alone
<3> I have a life. It ****s, but I have one.
<3> "leave".
<4> 'kay?
<4> e.g. OK?
<3> 'Kay is perfectly acceptible, it's an abbreviation of 'okay'. It's even marked as one, that's what the apostrophe is there for.
<4> hmm
<4> bye
<5> Kajito: dotn try to arhue with them, you'll loose (from their point of view of course)
<5> Kajito: argue even :p
<3> And lose? :D
<1> heh, wanna bet?
<5> i've a problem with this verb i cant spell it :( i never know if it's loose or lose
<3> I can help with that.
<3> Loose is only used when referring to the absence of tightness. For all else use 'lose'. :)
<6> Howdy
<3> "His cornering is loose" for example, referring to a sloppy line, or "He has a loose grip on the English language", referring to our friend Chipko perhaps ...
<1> heh, any easy means of actually memorising that?
<3> Coma; It's a rough one.
<3> If you've been handled by teachers that didn't care it's quite hard
<1> I guess I'll just have to get a tatoo then
<3> As for me, I have marks on the back of my knuckles. :P Sometimes homeschooling isn't all roses and milk.
<3> And CTS, but that's from the keyboard.
<3> ... and damnit, this song is awesome.
<3> Anyway coma, any ideas on my little problem?
<1> heh, how much is exactly lost?
<3> Nothing, it's all still there
<1> or did it only crash, without taking all of your data with it?
<3> Tried to log in and X crashed with a failure on authentication.
<1> some odd combination I haven't seen before, though. it really drops you back to the commandline?
<3> Back to the login screen.
<1> I think your description of what's happening is a bit off then.
<3> The error message is from X, and it's something to do with not having permission to write something.
<1> so X doesn't exactly crash, but you keep ending up at gdm....
<7> excuse me how can i know the ram and How many filedescriptors is the kernel set for ?
<3> The paranoid schizo in me is saying that something has managed to change the actual root p***word, as I only have sudo access...
<1> SadHero: free will tell you the amount of memory available/in use and the fd setting's somewhere burried in /proc/sys/, have a look there
<1> Kajito: can you login as a regular user?
<3> I'm not trying to log in as root.
<3> I'm trying to log in as me
<1> SadHero: ok, it's in /proc/sys/fs/file-max
<3> I only pull on the SuperUser jumper when I really need to.
<7> Coma: -bash: cd: /proc/sys/fs/file-max: No such file or directory
<1> SadHero: it's a "file", e.g. cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
<7> Coma: there's no fs in sys only kernel and on kernel there's only ostype and osrelease and version nothing else
<1> Kajito: have you atleast tried logging in as root to see if that still works?
<3> I don't know the root p***word, I was never given the option to set it.
<1> SadHero: err, what kind of limited system are you on?
<3> It's sudo restricted I'm told.
<1> Kajito: ugh, how.... friendly
<1> yeah, a bit like osx forces you to work, which I plainly dislike.
<1> Kajito: ok, what if you drop back to the shell (ctrl-alt-f1), login there, terminate gdm (sudo /etc/init.d/gdm stop) and then try starting X manually, does that work?
<7> hmmz, im running redhat 9.0 linux, cant i know the filedescripters?
<3> I'll try it shortly.
<8> hmm running redhat 9.0 have you ever considered upgrading to something more recent?
<1> SadHero: you realise that rh9 is terribly outdated, right?
<1> not to mention one giant security disaster waiting to happen
<1> but, even on such an outdated piece of junk, /proc/sys/fs/file-max shoudl be available
<7> aha
<8> darn i gotta add more stuff to the ssl management tools in HH
<8> looks alot like time dont it :)
<1> $(*^&@*&%@# could have been on my way home already
<1> and with that, I have to part or I'll be late for my date
<1> cheerio
<9> unix>date
<9> unless she's 18 with tux tattood on her ***
<9> ;)
<8> and she is willing to show you the tatoo
<9> exactly
<9> haha sup Redragon^
<9> i am still woo'ing at tiger
<9> runs pretty good if you kill dashboard
<3> I like the MacOS, but I'm not buying a Mac.
<8> its gonna change anyway
<10> darkn3ss: what is 'dashboard'? something like a xfce-iconbox or gnome taskbar?
<9> Redragon^: i heard that when they go intel its going to be like non-x86, more like apples instructions with intel making the cpu, and that they still will support tiger and above
<9> OptimusPrime- i havent figured it out 100% yet, its just some windows-ish thing with like a calculator a calender etc
<3> It's already changed
<8> not sure, didn't think intel would design a brand new chip for them
<3> It's not non-x86
<3> It's P4's essentially
<3> but with new firmware platforms
<10> darkn3ss: oh
<9> Kajito- and you work for apple i'm ***uming?
<3> darkn3ss; No, but I read the news. Do some research.
<9> i work in an apple soter
<9> store*
<9> christ
<9> can i spell or what?
<10> Kajito: prob a P4 without the cisc emulation
<3> You can! Just proved it :D
<9> no one knows 100% whats going to happen with intel/apple yet
<3> OptimusPrime; No, it's an intact P4 with a new firmware platform. Why would Intel do a custom fab for a small customer?
<9> not even apple has a clue whats going on yet
<9> small customer?
<9> heh
<9> apples not _that_ small
<9> i know this much, i wont get rid of my mac mini til its dead
<3> Apple is small.
<11> what would be the best way of making php execute system commands as root? make it execute a suid bash script?
<3> It's tiny.
<9> bought it yesterday, and i love it so much
<3> Compare apple to dell.
<10> Kajito: for starters, money... and two, it wouldnt be that hard to do... the P4 has a risc core, changing the cisc emulation around wouldn't be that big of a problem/issue
<9> compare the reliability from the 2
<11> (webphp, not cli)
<3> http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0506intelmac.html
<3> OptimusPrime; It would take a custom fab.
<9> thinksecret.com is hardly a trusted news partner
<3> Intel aren't big on those.
<9> now cnn or something like that
<9> i guess we shall all wait and see
<9> either way, i'm still keepin the g4 forever
<9> for 5 bills, its a hella good machine
<3> My P4 cost me about 6 packs of cigarettes. :D
<3> Mac Minis are not IBM compatible. o_O
<9> but my g4 would stomp on a p4
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux
#linux
linsara
not synching vfs
#AllNiteCafe
fhjui
lolita-island
#linuxhelp
#c
#AllNiteCafe
|
|