| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system
<0> done :)
<0> instaling courier now :)
<1> can someone explain me why the **** does pppd KEEPS KILLING ITSELF
<1> for NO APPARENT REASON
<2> flush: Watch your language here
<1> yea right... any idea why it behaves that way?
<2> Could be any number of reasons. No info in the syslog available?
<2> Or try running pppd in debug mode for a little more verbose output
<1> yea im trying to find a pppd how to but i cant get none which actually works
<1> im under mandrake 10.0 and i'm usin kppp (which i know isnt worth a ****)
<1> do you have any idea on how i could run pppd by itself, without p***ing through kppp
<2> Last warning, mind your language here.
<2> See the rules url in the /topic? I suggest you have a look at that
<1> yea sorry
<3> flush: read http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/PPP-HOWTO/ *after* you've read the rules
<1> roger
<3> at least I managed, a few years ago, to get online using that
<4> can anyone tell me what an LVS is?
<4> a webserver LVS?
<5> !lvs
<6> hmm... lvs is Linux Virtual Server is a highly scalable and highly available server built on a cluster of real servers
<4> ahhan, cluster....
<4> where can i find more help on setting up a webserver lvs?
<2> The lvs site perhaps?
<4> ok, thank you!
<4> i'll check out the documentation...
<7> is fedora core 5 good distro for a begginner ?
<8> staouu, I would suggest u start out with Mandriva 2006. Its totally easy and comfortable and no much configuring
<2> Or how about ubuntu?
<2> Suse seems to be nice, too
<8> Once u get the hang of it try experimenting with Fedora,SuSE etc. I would not recommend Ubuntu as of know coz its debian based
<8> Start with rpm base and then move on to debian
<2> You make it sound like anything debian based is a bad thing, while quite the opposite
<8> nop
<8> for a begginner that's a goos way to start
<2> At most, apt-get'll turn you into a lazy bastard ;)
<8> and debian is in the top of the phyramid
<8> that looks like a good thing no ?
<2> Heh, imho, debian covers all
<8> but would you recomand a begginner to start with debian ?
<2> Pure debian perhaps not, hence me suggesting ubuntu
<2> You could be starting out a whole lot worse though, considering other alternatives
<8> staouu, so u start out with Mandriva 2006. Its totally easy and comfortable and no much configuring
<8> Once u get the hang of it try experimenting with Fedora,SuSE etc.
<2> Heh, in case you haven't noticed, he left a little ago
<8> noticed
<9> so... who's a svn expert? ^_^
<2> Znuff: HellHound is
<2> Znuff: Of course, you could also just state your problem and hope someone capable is around to answer
<8> Znuff, i'll still stick to gcc
<2> rotflol
<2> BattleNet: Do you know the difference between a compiler and a version control system?
<8> right
<8> it's a subversion client tool --command line based
<8> hey BlackNet
<9> Coma, when I issue "svn status" I get something like this:
<9> ? .htaccess
<9> ? init.inc
<9> ! .
<6> i heard . is .
<9> I don't get it what ? and ! means... =/
<10> where can i find debian linux ?
<9> www.debian.org
<2> Znuff: try "svn help status", that should explain
<10> how many cds are for debian ?
<9> oh, ok
<2> waxenz: Currently, it spans 14 cds
<10> 14 cds?
<9> uhm, item is missing? wtf?
<9> waxenz, yeah, but nobody downloads it, usually you do a netinstall
<2> waxenz: You don't need to download all of them though. The first cd should suffice, which'll let you do a network based install
<2> Znuff: Yeah, that's very weird for a . directory
<11> can anyone help me with port forwarding in my iptables... i know it is just a one liner, but i keep getting the syntax wrong
<9> Coma, before I got not a working copy
<9> fixed that
<9> but now... wtf =/
<12> cheetahj2: show us what you've got
<11> paste whole iptables ?
<9> no, the line that's wrong
<12> no, just the rule in question
<11> :)
<11> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i ppp0 -d $external_ip --dport-6881 --sport 1024:65535 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.7:6881
<11> my apologies...
<2> Znuff: Does "svn ingo ." show anything funky?
<2> err, "svn info ."
<9> Path: .
<9> Node Kind: directory
<9> Schedule: normal
<12> cheetahj2: do your forwarding rules also allow those packets to p*** to your internal network?
<9> and there's also the uuid and url
<9> and revision
<2> Hmm
<2> You'd almost think your working copy got corrupted in some odd way
<11> thats what i was trying to do... actually full back and forth from internal to external
<11> other than that line... that hasnt been entered due to syntax error i have just used lokkit with simple config
<9> Coma, and svn update doesn't work
<2> And if you try checking out a new working copy?
<12> cheetahj2: if you're using connection tracking, all you need is one rule to allow the initial request to p***. i.e. iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i ppp0 --sport 1024:65535 -d 192.168.1.7 --dport 6881 -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -j ACCEPT - I'm not sure lokkit can help you with this, it's pretty limited, but I haven't used it in a long time
<11> yeah lokkit cant do... i will try this way now to see if it works
<13> were can i set the ssh allow ?
<13> i forgot ehhe
<2> What ssh allow? You don't mean /etc/hosts.allow, do you?
<13> oh yeah
<13> is that gonna affect everithing on my server ?
<13> i have a half life dedicated started on it
<2> Not if you only have your entries there apply to sshd only, and I doubt if a halflife server is compiled against tcp wrappers.
<2> Still, I[m not exactly sure that's what you're looking for
<13> i just want to restrict ssh conections
<12> I prefer to restrict sshd connections with sshd_config options, and iptables
<12> you can specify IPs and user names in sshd_config
<2> romeo: Restrict them based on what?
<13> on ip's
<13> local ip's
<2> romeo: Do what Fiver suggests
<13> aight'
<13> and what line am i looking for ? :X
<2> Um, line? Use whatever means your distro offers to administrate iptables (your firewall)
<13> i'm using FC5
<13> and i really don't know what i have to look for
<13> i just wanna secure it
<2> Check the documentation section on the fedora site. It's bound to have some info on this
<13> damn, i was hoping it would be easy
<13> :P
<13> i'l just change the sshd port
<13> i hate ssh scanners
<2> That sort of measures is often refered to as "security by obscurity", which has been proven not to work at all
<13> port changing ?
<2> Yup
<13> lol
<13> why ?
<13> i deleted all the unused users
<2> Then atleast resort to using tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny), but you really should look into using iptables for this
<13> or made them nologins
<13> aight'
<13> thanks anyway :D
<2> Else have a look at tools like shorewall or firestarter, which seem easy to use frontends to iptables
<13> neah, it would just slow it down
<13> it's a pentium 2
<13> and runs a half life dedicated with 14 slots
<14> I need help on Mandriva Can someone help me?
<15> Mandrake4: See /topic
<2> romeo: Having iptables rules in place would actually cause a whole lot less overhead than using tcpwrappers
<13> so why isn't that installed as default ?
<13> if it's so easy
<15> romeo: What distro are you running?
<13> FC5
<15> iptables is installed by default
<2> I'd ***ume even something as [ beeeeeep ] as fedora would have iptables installed
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux
#windows
#AllNiteCafe
#squid
root de scan
su incorrect passwork
touch function not implemented:gentoo
The requested method POST is not allowed for the URL /sendmail.php.
wiednet il bahar
#linux
|
|