| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:
<0> course they out of business now, it wasn't the only dumb thing they did :)
<1> I love /24s!
<2> is better to split and councur
<2> lol
<0> i would never subnet larger than /24
<1> Having to manage 200 /27s and 100 /26s gets boring after a while.
<0> maybe even cut those in 1/2
<3> Jack: Process, somewhat, kernel thread no.
<1> Redragon: Hm.
<1> Redragon: Depends.
<1> Redragon: I can see cases where it's not that bad an idea.
<2> longword why not who cand modify that ?
<0> and the biggest stupid thing they did, imo, was having workstations and servers on the same subnet
<2> longword why not who can modify that ?
<0> man why clutter the server network with all them windows packets from workstations ...
<3> When kernel work doesn't get done your kernel freezes until it does get done.
<2> well it freezeds
<2> well it freezes anyway so ...
<1> Redragon: :-)
<2> well so there is no way to stop martian pakets from windws?
<0> eek :)
<0> yea, routers
<2> what range of ports the come from?
<2> what range of ports the packets come from?
<3> Jack: I believe we told you what to do quite some time ago
<0> segment, route, block windows packets in
<3> It's not a port thing
<2> i see
<2> but can it be done? on linux i guess
<2> cisco use less hardwer the a linux server
<2> i gues if is done whay we eill need routers for
<2> i gues if is done whay we will need routers for ...
<2> i gues i am daydreaming agian
<2> :)
<1> Cisco uses more expensive hardware. :-P
<2> like edo ram
<2> as in 486 hardware
<1> And CAM.
<1> But, actually, let's not go there.
<4> I dunno wtf I'm doing wrong here, but I can't get this htaccess/htp***wd file to work. It's for awstats, and I go htp***wd -c awstats.pl Username, then enter the p***word twice, reload apache (dunno if that's even required) and when it asks for my login info I enter it and it doesn't allow me in. Any ideas?
<1> I've a router with a 600MHz processor here.
<1> Let me rephrase. First router I logged in on has a 600MHz processor.
<1> And can route and do most stuff better than any Linux machine can ever.
<1> With a 10 time faster processor.
<2> that is why i belive the coding for linux is behaind
<1> (No, it cannot switch/route faster from the same group of 8 ports... but, minor details, that's the stupid card)
<1> JackOfBlades: You're quite the expert, aren't you?
<2> no iam not
<2> i am kinda dumb
<1> Thank you.
<5> hallo
<5> i got a problem regarding frontend
<1> JackOfBlades: You do know there's more to routin/switching than processor?
<1> JackOfBlades: And that Cisco hardware can only do routing/switching.
<2> yes
<2> someosy leveles that kernel cannot support
<1> JackOfBlades: Well, you can run Apache on it, but don't expect to serve more than a couple of requests per second.
<2> some osi leveles that kernel cannot support
<1> Wha?
<1> You're either on crack, or just a troll.
<2> none of the above
<5> i was trying to install skystar2 on centos and when a try to see if my device is working i got an error message saying that "opening frontend failed: No such device or address"
<5> any help would be appreciated, thank you
<5> i also tryed to modprobe frontend...but it doesn work
<2> gcbirzan beeing a guru and all
<2> why don't you do a fix
<1> A fix for?
<2> on some linux os so that we all can use it
<1> Stop trolling. Really.
<2> sofitirq problem and routing on linux
<1> It's either that, or you're an idiot.
<1> What softirq problem?
<1> Do you have any f'n idea what a softirq is?
<2> high ksoftirq load on cpu
<2> yea i read documentation i know what it is
<1> And why do you think it's a Linux problem?
<2> because is on a linux server?
<2> why now i have 3 root 19 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 315:12.88 ksoftirqd_CPU0
<2> any some time ago i had
<2> <2> 3 root 19 19 0 0 0 R 91.6 0.0 270:14.35 ksoftirqd_CPU0
<2> ?
<1> I take it back. You're a liar, too.
<1> You said you knew what softirqs are.
<6> This is a help channel... Not for argueing... Read the rules. In other words don't be rude.
<1> where are the rules?
<1> 02:50 -!- No topic set for #LINUXHELP
<1> Heh. Okay, that was a troll. :-P
<6> http://www.getlinuxhelp.org/rules.php
<1> rikki: There's nothing in there about this. Except Sacha's poem.
<2> gcbirzan is easy to make fun of other rater then pointing the real problem
<2> and yes this issue has to do with softirq
<1> JackOfBlades: The real problem is either the hardware, or the network design, as previously suggested.
<2> yes that will be fiex but i am looking to make a fix on the linux machine
<1> Fix the NICs.
<1> Do you have NAPI on those drivers?
<2> the nics are fine
<2> now they work ok
<1> some drivers allow you to tune it, it's called interrupt mitigation.
<1> It's also called that.
<2> where can i fount drivers for some realtek gigabit card
<2> that can do that
<1> You need to get Intel NICs.
<2> that is on my todo list
<2> today
<2> hmm
<1> Oh, ffs. :-P
<2> gcbirzan tell me how can u provide gigabit connetion for your clients ?
<2> over ppoe
<2> i tryed that and id not succed
<1> Gigabit over PPPoE?
<2> yes clients too have 1000/Mbs
<2> regardles of theyr subnet
<1> Heh. Can you show me some (under 10k USD :-P) hardware that can do that? :-)
<1> You could probably do it with Linux at 10k USD, come to think of it.
<2> yes
<2> but not with ppoe
<2> but not with pppoe
<1> Well, with PPPoE. Trust me on this one. :-)
<2> :)
<1> It matters.
<1> Aside your 'softirq' problem, which can be easily solved.
<1> (In 99% of cases, and judging by your choice of hardware, probably in yours too)
<2> ok tell me how i listemnig realy
<1> Get real NICs.
<1> Also. From what I gather, you have a huge broadcast domain.
<2> yes
<1> Router or bridge?
<2> router
<2> using imq
<1> Uh.
<1> No, mistake number one.
<1> Separate routing from QOS.
<2> is on my todo list
<1> Second. Tune cache routing table and arp cache sysctl parameters.
<1> And, disable connection tracking.
<2> what is conetcion tracking ?
<1> Stateful packet inspection.
<1> Mister Expert.
<2> ok how do i disable that ?
<2> i am no expert jut a guy on a rainy day :)
<1> Recompile your kernel without support for that, if you have.
<2> what will that do?
<1> ***.
<1> JackOfBlades: Why don't you hire a network admin?
<2> beside that
<1> Besides that... Go RTFM.
<2> ok
<2> next steps ?
<1> STFW
<2> STFW as in ?
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#mirc
#MissKitten
#linux
#linux
#gentoo
#linux
#MissKitten
#MissKitten
#skype
sensolube
|
|