| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> longword: is that your end goal?
<1> whats the easiest wat to make a bash script repeat itself, for example #!/bin/bash <new line> df -h && sleep 60 <-- make that repeat?
<2> Chris_Tucker have a look at 'watch'
<1> oooh.... nice.. no bash script needed, thanks!
<0> lol
<3> hello, I use wlan drivers and keep getting network is down when i try ot coneect
<0> longword: did I scare you?
<3> when i use Fedora network configuration it says device not activa and there is no way to activate
<4> kerberos isnt hard
<0> themaxxz: documentation and support isn't *great* on it though
<0> I've had to strace it a couple times :P
<4> once set it up to enable a trust between samba and ad
<0> I setup our corporate mail server to have both postfix and cyrus auth against it
<0> which is pretty cool
<0> but not as cool as I wanted it to be
<0> (ideally I'd make all web logins do the same but krb5 acts weird with load balancers)
<5> ralf: Sorry, doing up a custom kickstart file for a colleague
<0> longword: oh ok
<0> I've been meaning to ask about ESX server btw
<0> anyone used it?
<5> No XP with ESX here
<0> damn
<5> I'm interested in making it go with Windows
<4> ralf-x, I use gsx
<5> But _without_ AD or any Windows domains
<0> friend of mine is thinking about moving their entire infrastructure over to a couple beefy 4 way SMP dual core machines
<4> i'm talking management into getting a DL585 to run gsx on :)
<0> running ESX on them
<0> and virtulazing the hell outa it
<5> DL585s are mighty tasty
<0> themaxxz: not sure of the difference, but how is that going?
<6> Erm, what is gsx or ESX?
<4> ralf-x, I love it
<5> But have you seen the latest DL580s?
<4> but i'm just using it for testing/troubleshooting
<5> You know how you can hot-swap drives?
<7> can sombody help me install my wireless card on knoppix/
<5> Well, on the latest DL580s you can hot-swap CPU boards
<4> longword, want quad cpu for this :)
<0> longword: interesting. you might need to install MIT software on the windows machines to make that happen, but I'm not sure
<4> 4 low end amd opterons
<0> longword: that's awesome
<5> I think it'll hot-swap RAM too
<5> I know it'll do RAID on the RAM
<0> haahahaha sweet
<0> that's crazy
<4> if I get it approved this baby will have 16GB
<5> It certainly is.
<4> should be good enough to run about 50 or so VM's at the same time
<0> themaxxz: so would you run an entire hosting infrastructure on ESX/GSX?
<4> ralf-x, if you are giving the same 'hardware' as you would for real machines, sure
<0> themaxxz: meaning... you don't think the CPU is better utilized in a virtualized setup?
<1> hm
<4> ralf-x, well you can consider running more since you'll have idle time
<4> but if its for serious work I wouldnt
<1> i need somethng other than watch.. it seems watch doesnt like lynx
<6> Chris_Tucker: actually, anything that monkeys with stdout won't work under "watch"
<1> is there a way to make a bash script repeat? right now i just get a mess that makes a mess of duplicate processes
<0> themaxxz: so for serious work/hosting you'd prefer to stick with Real Hardware?
<6> Chris_Tucker: how about "watch lynx -dump yada?
<4> ralf-x, no, read again what I said, if you dont over utilized the system it should be fine
<6> just don't use a pipe either.
<1> -dump?
<6> Chris_Tucker: man lynx, lynx --help
<1> oh , i though the -dump was for watch :p
<6> Chris_Tucker: no.
<4> if irl you would run hosting on lets say 4 1GHz 512MB machines, I wouldn run more then 4VM for the same job on a 4GHz machine with 2GB
<0> so you can indeed oversubscribe your machines
<0> (seems like you would be able to)
<4> ralf-x, of course
<4> but if you see that your 4machines only run at 75% , then you could add another one
<0> *nod*
<4> i'm able to run around 6windows on a dual 1.3G 2GB ram without getting a hit
<0> gotcha
<0> had a chance to work with VMware support?
<4> nope
<8> Hum.
<8> F'n multicast.
<4> gcbirzan, heh
<8> Disabling PIM on certain key VLANs got rid of our ~5% packet loss...
<4> but ..multicast is supposed to reduce traffic :)
<1> Viking667, seems thats exactly what i needed, thanks!
<9> Anyone here using the latest Postfix 2.3 snapshot?
<6> Chris_Tucker: be aware it'll only work for really short webpages, or webpages where you want the tail end of the page.
<1> Viking667, i noticed, but what i need it to do, it does.
<10> Can someone explain to me, how I use the URI (applications-all-users:///) fr gnome? I can't get it to work...and the documentations is eighter very unclear here or i'm just very dense (might be the second one)
<11> !uri
<12> hmm... uri is a generic URL, eg anything://something
<4> uniform resource identification
<13> isn't a uri more like the whatever:// section
<14> dont do that again Decadent
<13> and the rest is the url
<15> sorry
<13> identifier and locater
<14> thank you :)
<13> i dunno, that's what i always ***umed
<10> Hmm, so maybe I'm just using it the wrong way then....
<10> Nautilis seems to think it's an Http adress....
<5> danq: Why the snapshot?
<5> danq: What's wrong with 2.2.8?
<9> I wanted Dovecot SASL support.
<5> Fair enough.
<5> Is that available as a patch for the 2.2 series?
<9> Doesn't look like it will happen today
<9> No, it is not.
<9> 2.3 incorporates a pluggable SASL interface, which is too muchof a change for 2.2 I would ***ume, which is why there is no real patch
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
HP + TIJ4
#linux
doup photoshop
firewall kerboros port
#linux
#linux
#MissKitten
#chatzone
#linux
What valuable edible fungus grows undergound ?
|
|