| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:
<0> and fc5 comes in what, a week?
<0> ish
<1> yea and thats where i'm having problems, ppl using rhel 4, centos 4, mandriva, fc4, and now debian
<1> i have a solution to gnuhh to work with both modules but the info encrypted with 2.13 < doesn't decrypt with 2.14 >
<1> and thats just bad bad bad
<1> oh oh maybe something here
<2> Fiver: They'd have you believe Thursday
<1> yea their backward compatibility isn't so compatible
<0> they got their backwards upside down
<3> Redragon^: they did it to piss you off i think :)
<1> it worked
<1> i was hoping for a release monday but this puts a real damper on it
<4> I have problem with opendchub on my debianbox.. it's on LAN on my network... other outside users can connect to it but when I try I get "connection closed" right after I connected
<4> any ideas?
<3> it's already at 2.17, so gnuhh is 4 versions behind
<2> jz: Best guess it's NAT issues
<4> why would you say so?
<2> jz: It's the most likely problem given the limited information provided
<3> heheh.
<4> longword, well I redirected a port on the debian to forward port 4001 to my computer.
<4> ?
<2> jz: Yeah, but if over those connections through the dc protocol your box annouces to the world "Hey! Look at me! I'm 10.0.0.5 come connect to me!"...
<4> lets say I connect my portable hard-disk to my desktop running gentoo at the usb
<4> I can access it via /dev/sda1
<4> but.. lets say if i remove that and connect my digital camera to it, will it still be /dev/sda1 ?
<3> what does that have to do with iptables?
<5> jzakhem: Try it and see.
<4> thats another question
<1> longword it looks like it may be something in 2.17 itself
<1> gonna try 2.14 and see if it works
<3> something good?
<1> will know in a few
<3> # RANDOMIV-compatible mode
<3> well the RANDOMIV seems compatible
<1> same thing with 2.14
<3> uhm.
<4> any ideas please?
<6> Anyone here understand apt? I want need help understanding the dist field in the sources.list file
<0> man sources.list? :)
<1> still not decrypting properly
<6> Fiver I read that
<0> okie :)
<6> Like for example
<6> rpm-dir file:/RPMS/ stable main contrib
<6> In that line.... stable.. main contrib
<4> guys please
<6> Who makes those..... cl***es
<0> TinFury: you're on fedora?
<6> Yea
<0> TinFury: then you should be using yum
<6> I prefer apt.... do you know where "stable main contrib" is coming from?
<6> I just made those up
<3> Redragon^: so what are you going to do ?
<6> and it worked..... but I'm not seeing all my stuff
<1> not sure just yet
<1> got an email out to the author for input
<7> morning, all.
<1> he probably knows something i dont
<6> Mabey I'm using the wrong word... mabey it's not distribution but component
<6> I don't understand where the component is coming from
<1> hiya Viking667
<1> longword the webmail app looks much more like a mail app now with its graphics added hehe
<8> ever use reiser4?
<9> Redragon^, do you GPL it?
<2> Friends don't let friends do ReiserFS
<1> hehe
<1> tuxxboxx you mean my software?
<9> jupp
<1> yup sure is
<9> nice :D
<1> oh man this ****s
<3> that's sure.
<3> crypt:cbc ****s.
<3> it's the only way right?
<1> i dont get errors with the new stuff but it sure dont decrypt old stuff properly
<1> and i do everything i can to have nice clean upgrade paths
<3> well all i can say is good luck.
<1> i have to wonder what the odds are that someone will move their cbc from 2.12 to > 2.12
<1> casue on old systems it would work, on new systems it would work, but on upgraded systems (ie dist-upgrade) it would totally trash out
<3> on ubuntu it does not happen i think. since i dist-upgrade all the day
<3> what should not work?
<4> im looking at ipodlinux.org
<7> lol. Sounds like what I'm doing by hand at the moment.
<4> feels tempted to try
<1> what version of cbc is running on your box?
<4> anyone tried it??
<3> jzakhem: yes.
<3> Redragon^: i really don't know.
<3> how do i find out?
<4> any good?
<1> look in the CBC.pm file
<1> it will be one of the first few lines
<3> $VERSION = '2.17';
<3> what the hell ?
<3> gnuhh is working i think.
<3> if it was something wrong with it, what would not work?
<1> hmm
<3> so how do i check if gnuhh works proper ?
<10> mysql -e "GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON theDatabase.* TO '`echo $SQLUSER`'@'localhost' IDENTIFIED BY '`echo $SQLP***`'"
<10> huh huh
<10> it works
<3> damn, i know you would like access to the box, but the damn phone provider keeps stalling me.
<3> well congrats :)
<10> k, back to work.
<3> jzakhem: ipodlinux is very well supported on < 4G and Nano's
<3> if you've got a video like i have i wouldn't recommend it.
<3> ergh. it's getting late.
<4> I use Photo IPod
<3> that's going to work hehe.
<3> but still, be careful.
<3> it's not officially supported .. so...
<4> can you see rockbox.org?
<4> would that be better?
<3> jzakhem: that would be killing your ipod i think. it's no good, no video/photo support, no extra functions
<4> with ipodlinux, i can play video on my photo ipod?
<11> hey .. somebody has an ideea(in few words) about how to: offering a protected
<11> workspace(in windows) in a integrated web aplication for executing unix commands on other
<11> machine(linux) ?
<3> jzakhem: uncompressed video, that's going to weight a lot.
<3> Pasquale: your question is ambigue, can you reformulate?
<4> uncompressed video is?
<11> ok
<4> synaptic?
<12> extra, extra, read all about it, synaptic is the Conectiva APT front-end, uses the WINGS toolkit for the GUI, see http://distro.conectiva.com.br/projetos/46/
<3> jzakhem: a very big avi file.
<1> longword what CBC does centos 4 have? version number that is
<11> synaptic i need to do a workspace integrated in a web aplication for executing commands on a linux machine
<3> workspace integrated in a web aplication
<2> Redr: Gimme a sec.
<11> an interactive one ..
<3> this is really....
<4> :(
<3> jzakhem: 20 mins of video would be 1GB at 12fps
<11> a command line
<7> whoff...
<7> synaptic: that's a LOTTA data.
<3> Pasquale: php would do.
<7> Is that even at 320x240?
<3> Viking667: and think, 12fps. put it at 25 and it will go wild
<3> Viking667: i think it's 240*204
<11> ok synaptic thx
<3> or smth like that.
<3> let me check ipod photo's screen size.
<3> because i know it, i put ipodlinux on one of my friends photo ipods.
<7> ouch.
<3> i really liked it since it had the dualboot thing
<7> I want an ipod, but not a "Shuffle"
<3> heh
<7> Not sure if I want a Nano either...
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
prozacpimp
mplayer libpangcairo
kickit2
#london
#php
#mirc
#teens
#linux
#linuxhelp
zulu ie7
|
|