| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> i cant even choose ntfs or fat32
<1> it has inferior fdisk.
<0> ok then tell me how i can make a fat32 parttion under linux that windows will accept to read
<2> has anyone successfully setup slack on a usb drive
<2> not that slax distribution
<0> i choose fat32 formated partitions made under linux and it says "filesystem not compatible blah blah blah"
<1> flush: use cfdisk, create a partition, change type to 0b
<2> im talking about Slack10
<0> its exactly what i did
<1> save, exit, mkfs.vfat -F32 /dev/<device>
<0> roger
<1> should work.
<0> mayday mayday
<0> how can i access the hdd if its on another computer on the private network
<0> access the hdd with cfdisk i mean
<0> or where can i donwload mkfs.vfat since im using a old slackware version and it doesnt have it installed
<3> sweet looks like i'm closing in on the end of rel 1 of webmail :)
<4> anyone know how i can make openoffice detect punctuation mistakes?
<4> punctuation/spacing
<5> night
<4> 'night
<1> ra
<4> ra?
<1> yes. raa
<4> are you trying to intimidate me?
<4> :P
<1> YES!
<6> what "tzvf" in between of the tar file?
<1> t == list
<1> z == gzip
<1> v == verbose
<1> f == file name to follow
<6> thanks
<7> good day
<2> good night
<7> total :*
<2> is there a nix port?
<7> yes
<7> but i was playing in winBlows
<7> i got dual boot
<2> oh
<7> i was testing my new x1600 series
<7> ATI X1600 pro that is (VGA)
<7> gift from my sister
<7> yeah yeah yeah, she loves me
<7> and she knows am a geek
<1> geez.
<7> hey bronie!
<1> hey WhiteWabbit
<7> this one kicks butt!
<7> i get ~60fps in 1280x1024
<1> cool.
<1> in doom3?
<7> or close to that, yeah
<1> I'd probably get about 1fps.
<1> at 640x480
<7> lol
<1> i830 -- go integrate graphics go!
<1> I can play quake3 quite well at 640x480, but no more.
<1> the problem is, if you actually did that the power usage of this laptop would go through the roof.
<8> i can't get past the "your card ****s" at installation
<7> bronie, indeed
<7> when i tried to play doom3, my laptop couldnt do any good so i cried
<1> hah
<7> lol
<7> i really did
<7> now i feel better w/ my new desktop
<1> uh huh.
<7> okay enough smoke, back to doom3
<9> how can i find out if my eth is in full 100mps duplex ?
<1> thesefirah: usually drivers report duplex status in kernel messages... run dmesg.
<9> eth1: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1 hmmm :( but i can transfer only at 10mbps what the hell...
<1> what's the endpoint, and what's in between?
<9> only a switch
<9> my computer:))
<1> and.. is your computer 100MBit?
<1> also, you realize 100MBit -> roughly 10MByte/sec transfer rate right?
<9> yes
<9> im having 1mB now :(
<1> so what does your switch say about what's connected to it?
<9> 100
<9> standarrd
<9> its not gigabit :D
<1> so both say 100MBit?
<9> yeah...
<1> ok. well, then the connection is not the bottleneck.
<9> thats why i thought there was smething fishy
<10> somebody can help me?
<10> anybody knows smth about masquerading restictions?
<1> restrictions?
<10> how can I know if a host runs NAT
<10> and deny the NAT trafic from him
<1> first question is -- why?
<10> if host A masqerade his local 192.168.0.0/24
<10> how can I accept host A traffic and deny his local 192.168.0.0/24 masqeraded local networkl
<10> we have a network
<10> and we want only the real ip have internet access
<10> *ips
<1> block all traffic with source port > 50000
<10> we privede ip like
<1> but that's not a guarantee. really, you can't tell.
<10> 96.107.0.0/16
<10> we privede ips like 86.107.0.0/16 ...and we want to deny masqeraded traffic from them
<1> well, I described one way.
<10> let's say only 86.107.10.1 have access and not his 192.168.0.2/255 local network
<10> what will be that way?
<1> block all traffic with source port > 50000
<1> because masquerading generally maps connections into that space.
<10> is there any way we can know if the trafic come from 86.107.10.1 or it come from 192.168.0.2 masqeraded by 86.107.10.1 ?
<10> aham
<1> there's no hard and fast way to tell that, as far as I know
<1> there's only heuristics. I just described one.
<10> i heard something about TTL of packets ...
<1> if I were implementing NAT I'd simply modify the TTL too.
<1> big deal.
<10> any documentation about that?
<1> dunno, just read the NAT code in linux.
<10> so ,there is no way to say if a packed is from a masqeraded host or not
<1> as I said, there's heurestics.
<1> heuristics.
<10> can you provide some more info pls
<1> not much, unfortunately. don't know where to find this kind of info.
<10> some google keywords?
<1> nope.
<10> ok...
<10> thanks for your help
<1> it used to be that NAT mapped the source port to something over 60000 -- but now I don't know.
<10> internet----router A ----------HOST B (running masqerade with iptables)---- ------192.168.0.0/24
<10> how can router A know if a packed is from host B or from a local 192.168.0.3 let-s say
<11> Router A doesn't need to know.
<11> It shouldn't have ever seen the packet in the first place.
<11> The only way the packet could have gotten to A is if it came from B. B wouldn't have sent it there if it were meant for B's subnet.
<1> mwilson: thus my heuristic comment. though I guesss most NAT implementations -do- decrement TTL
<12> Linux pr0h4x 2.4.18 #4 Fri May 31 01:25:31 PDT 2002 i686 unknown
<1> flush_: and?
<0> hrmmm
<1> flush_: what's with the old kernel?
<0> its the slackware box
<0> Linux h4xb0x 2.4.22-10mdk #1 Thu Sep 18 12:30:58 CEST 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
<0> here too, i should upgrade youre right
<11> flush: Gee, l337 much?
<0> lawlawl
<13> 3y3 4m 1337
<11> flush: Whatever that's supposed to mean.
<0> 3y3 R teh ult1m4t3 1337c4|<3 0p|-\ d0()/\/\
<13> u R about 2 be t3h bann3d
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#chatzone
HTB-tools centos
#linuxhelp
priveyt
#AllNiteCafe
half-iranian girls
Binary Search for C++
Dharshini David
wahda wahda+free
#chatzone
|
|