| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> roflmao
<0> okay
<0> i typed startx
<0> and now i get a yellow screen and then it hangs
<1> me again. running a script 'cause output and I cannot exit from that window (or else the script dies). I have no 'screen'. tried using 'script > /dev/null 2>&1'. No output but it hangs... (runs ok but I cannot continue)
<2> oopsies
<3> dual203: So install screen, or use nohup
<4> Stick an & on the end?
<3> longword: The process will still terminate as soon as the session ends.
<1> longword: I did
<4> disown FTW
<1> Coma: nohup is the way to go... I saw that somewhere in it's crontab.... 'nohup script' should do it?
<3> Yup.
<1> Coma: 'nohup: appending output to `nohup.out'' and hangs...
<3> Oh, you would have wanted to stick & on the end there. nohup only make a process immune to hangups, it doesn't backgroudn them.
<5> there is setsid too
<5> setsid ./script &
<1> works.
<1> finally
<1> nohuo and & rulez :)
<1> hup
<1> thanks
<6> Ola??????????
<3> Your ? key seems to be stuck.
<6> Linguage is ENGLIsH?
<3> You've guessed that right.
<7> re oll
<8> mm. ok so is there a way to make postfix drop a message on the floor and not notify the sender?
<6> HD SAS who help-me?
<3> Guilherme_As: Perhaps you might want to try your luck in #linuxlatino instead
<6>
<6> they alguem can help me to make debian 3.1 r4
<6>
<6> they alguem can help me to make
<6>
<3> *sigh*
<3> All that in public?
<9> brb
<10> I have a Server 2003 DNS server and a linux client on the network with static IP addressing. How can I get the name hostname to be resolved by the DNS server?
<3> Add an A record
<10> To the DNS server?
<3> Yes
<10> Thanks allot. :)
<10> Coma, Do I have to manually add the reverse lookup as well?
<3> That, or just tick the box where it says "add reverse entry"
<10> Wicked
<10> Is there anything else I'd have to do?
<3> Nope, this should be it.
<10> Thanks again
<11> hello
<3> Hola niladam
<11> hey coma
<10> Hey how long before the DNS Server starts to resolve the addy? I did what I was to and it's not resolving
<10> Wait.
<3> It should be instantly
<10> Don't waste your time... I'm an idjut...
<10> lol
<12> I have a computer with a SATA-150 drive interface. Will a -100 or -300 SATA drive work (backward/forward compatibility issue) ?
<13> 100 will, 300 probably not.
<13> Would a DDR memory slot facilitate the use of DDR2 memory?
<13> Or a 100MBit NIC facilitate the use of a GigE interface?
<4> SATA-300 drives should function correctly on a SATA-150 interface
<4> A GigE interface will typically negotiate a 100Mbit connection with a 100BaseT interface
<12> longword: Thank you. Picked up an HP A1240N from the dump. It's functional.. would like to stick a second drive in it for Linux.
<12> [heh] Guy rolls up in front of me two weeks ago, opens the rear door, and says "Take It Away". 17-inch HP flat panel, A1240N (P4 H-T, 3 GHz, 1 GB, and plenty of inboard toys to play with). Price was right.
<13> You're cramping my style, longword.
<4> You don't have a style!
<13> ;)
<14> !seen redragon
<15> redragon <~redragon@64.39.1.11> was last seen on IRC in channel #linuxhelp, d h m s ago, saying: 'never messed with that one myself'.
<14> Hi guys
<13> Anyone know if it wuold be possible to send one print job in CUPS to two different devices?
<14> Anyone got a clue on regexp? I'm trying to get only the _value_ from an <option value="value_here">
<14> any clues on a simple regexp?
<16> hello everyone
<10> I have a windows 2003 server running DNS and a linux client machine. When the linux client requests a resolve hostname it doesn't get a response. Anyone know where to look or what to do?
<17> is there still a 2TB limit on a ext3 filesystem in linux?
<17> i am using a 2.4 still and that won't change
<18> i want to find out what file system a partition uses; how could i do that?
<19> With file(1).
<19> Saw this in-channel last night. Were you the one not paying attention to the answer then?
<10> Anyone?
<10> I have a windows 2003 server running DNS and a linux client machine. When the linux client requests a resolve hostname it doesn't get a response. Anyone know where to look or what to do?
<19> A-abc: Well?
<10> What did I get kicked for?
<10> msg'ing too fast?
<20> anyone know a good torrent client for linux?
<13> Azureus
<13> TinFury, how does the Linux client boot?
<13> DHCP, or static?
<20> lol, I said a "good" torrent client
<10> static
<13> lol, that is a "good" torrent client.
<13> TinFury, does /etc/resolv.conf list your nameserver IPs?
<20> java based, resource consuming
<20> not open source
<10> Yes and it can resolve things like www.google.com
<20> bleh
<10> Just nothing on the local network
<10> Like computer names and stuff like that
<13> Is Samba installed? I suspect you need NetBIOS name resolution.
<10> Oh
<10> Let me check
<13> The 'nmbd' daemon is what does the job.
<10> So install samba and just get the nmbd process running?
<13> Correct.
<19> TinFury: Why in the world do you expect DNS to resolve local machine names?
<10> Huh
<10> I don't know
<10> It's the computer names on the network I mean
<13> Well gee golly, it wouldn't be out of the question to have local machine names in DNS.
<10> It works for all the MS clients but not for the linux client
<10> Shouldn't DNS be able to resolve local compter names?
<13> Not unless those computer names are in DNS.
<13> Ignore him, TinFury. If he contributed once in a while and reserved his constantly chastising tone, he'd be entitled to his rants.
<13> But alas, this is not the case.
<10> lol ok
<13> Hasn't been for years, and will continue not to be for some time to come, I completely suspect.
<21> hai noroc Znuff
<19> danq: If you PUT those names in DNS, then yes, it should resolve them. He hasn't, so it shouldn't.
<14> huh?
<21> :)
<21> i flooded your *** some while ago
<21> =))
<13> He made no suggestion either way. I ***umed that they were not. If you were unsure about it, or could not draw a logical conclusion in a timely manner, perhaps a simple investigative question, rather than a chastising rant, should have been proposed.
<21> your astral =))
<13> My what?
<13> If you touch my ***, I will stab you in the face.
<21> i`m talking whit Znuff
<21> :)
<10> What are you guys talking about? The computer names? in DNS. Well MS clients can resolve them
<13> MS clients speak NetBIOS.
<10> And I see A records for all the computers on the network
<14> Uhm, excuse me?
<10> And there is an alias... That won't resolve either
<10> My linux client resolv.conf is like this
<10> nameserver 192.168.0.1
<10> search localdomain
<10> I was thinking something was missing from that
<13> If the Windows machine provides DHCP, it can also apply those DHCP lease ***ignments to its own DNS services.
<10> Right
<10> Everything else on the network uses DHCP except the linux machine
<10> I did the A record thing and now MS clients can resolve it by name and alias
<13> So everything except the Linux machine speaks NetBIOS, which explains why they can all resolve machine names (whch are not in DNS), and the Linux machine cannot, yes?
<10> I guess DNS is new to me. I'm reading thru the samba stuff now
<10> Is it as easy as starting the nmbd daemon or do I have to configure samba etc.
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#teens
zenity cron
javascript crossite variables
What is the warmest continent
melan12345
#linux
#linuxhelp
#linuxhelp
#AllNiteCafe
#skype
|
|