| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> wasnt HSP a modem or somethin' ?
<1> As opposed to a particularly poor example of a winmodem?
<2> mwilson: mwilson yeah, sure, continious reallocation for a counter
<3> yeah i have hsp56 micromodem
<2> mwilson: you have something more stupid to say ?
<3> and the sound card chipset says "hsp56 HRTF audio Com"
<1> T`aZ: You're the one who apparently thinks it's a good idea.
<3> with other numbers but its HSP56
<2> mwilson: not the way you say it
<0> flush and you're tryin' to play mp3's to your modem's audio ?
<1> flush: A HSP56 is a winmodem. A PCI128 is a sound card. What does the one have to do with the other?
<3> negative its not a damn modem
<0> =))
<4> mwilson: "eventually overflow" is a matter of practicality
<2> mwilson: btw who says it's kernel related ?
<0> T`aZ any recomandations ? ( something that doesnt need to much configuring ? )
<1> T`aZ: There's somewhere else it would be?
<3> damn damn damn i have the chip in my face, it says HSP56 CM18738/PCI-SX HRTF Audio Com MBJ96-037D 0104UGGD
<4> mwilson: If it'll overflow after the heat death of the universe, it hardly matters.
<2> mwilson: in ifconfig itself ?
<4> mwilson: if it overflows before then and it's useful for people, it's a bug.
<3> should i use the soundblaster or the other one
<2> BitlBee: iptables
<1> flush: Do you need a modem, or a sound card?
<3> a sound card
<1> flush: Then use the sound card, not the modem.
<3> omg
<4> s/before then/before a reasonable time has p***ed/
<2> BitlBee: with everything going through ACCEPT
<3> ill find you a ****ing picture of the hsp56 soundcard
<0> T`aZ can you give me an example ? :D
<2> BitlBee: iptables -A -j ACCEPT
<3> http://www.cmedia.com.tw/product/doc8738_pci.htm
<0> T`aZ and where do I see the traffic ? :D
<2> BitlBee: erm, more exactly -A SMTHG , with SMTHG being OUTPUT or POSTROUTING or something liek that i dont remember which one is the correct one
<0> hmm ..
<2> BitlBee: iptables -L ...(something) , man iptables for more info
<0> lewl ..
<0> -L is list .. -A append ..
<2> yup, but there is a summary switch or something, which will output the total
<0> I'll booble it in the morning
<0> right now .. I'll go dream some boobies
<5> srpms and normal disc's for fedora core 4 whats the difference
<0> geez
<0> srpms - source rpm's
<0> the normal discs are the binaries
<0> doubt you need the srpm's
<5> cool
<3> what could happen, at worse, if i unplug a pci card without shuting down the computer
<6> I used MySQL-administrator to add another user so i wont have to use root and it creates new_user and another tag
<3> do i have HIGH CHANCES of gettin it burned?
<6> when i'm selectin the newuser i can't add permissions but only to the 2nd one that i create, when i try to save changes it's says duplicate name etc, so my question is
<6> how do i add a user from within MySQL (console) or how do i add grant all to that user from MySQL(console) ?
<6> the damn thing crashes when i'm trying to apply changes.
<2> flush: probably the PS will shutdown anyway
<3> damn
<2> *NOT TESTED* :p
<3> yeah i know i wont do it
<7> The worst? You will short everything out, fry yourself and burn your house down.
<3> it involves too much risk to not loose my uptime, which i might loose anyway
<3> yeah i might die, at worst
<6> anyone ?
<3> i dunno bout mysql
<8> whitewabbit grant all privileges table.database to user@host using 'p***word'
<6> Redragon, let me try.
<6> Okay, listen, i will create one use from/with MySQL administrator.
<6> Then, i will do whatever you said and see if it works.I want this user to be able to create databses and to have permissions global.
<8> then its a bit different
<6> table.database ?
<8> just a sec
<6> i want him to have global
<6> thanks buddy
<8> grant all on *.* to user@host identified by 'p***word' with grant option
<8> then you need to do flush privileges;
<8> thats a global access administrator
<8> dvds :)
<6> Okay, one last question,
<6> why o why MySQL administrator has both @localhost and linux.site as user ?
<6> i have error in the syntax it says
<9> whitewabbit, To log in remote or local, see the helpfule help docs
<8> generally its best to limit that kinda access
<10> hi, i need some help, I have two network cards, one embedded on the mobo, and the other on a standard PCI slot
<11> How do I take the directory of /mnt/cdrom and turn that into an iso file that can be bootable once it has been burned with a program like k3b?
<6> That's what i did, Redragon, it says there is a problem w/ the syntax
<10> everytime I run netconfig, the internet is configured for the one embedded
<10> how do I specifiy that I want to use the second network card?
<10> i run slackware linux
<6> tell me what exactly i have to type to give global priviledges to that user please.
<8> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/grant.html
<6> i'm on it, thanks.
<10> sorry for my bad english, anyone can help me pls?
<10> basicly I have two netowrk cards, and I want to use only one for internet acces, but with the 'netconfig' tool it only uses the one embedded on the motherboard
<10> how do I specify which card to use?
<9> solis, With slackware, open an xterm and use ifconfig, see the man page for sytax
<10> ifconfig? i am not on slackware not, i will reboot and try, will the settings i make take effect every time i run linux?
<10> or do i need to add something to the initrd?
<5> ubuntu, suse, fedora or mandriva ? just need personal awnser's please !
<6> Redragon, i don't understand the document.
<12> c13 kinda hard to advise you on what others like, if you have no previous experience with linux then the main trend is to go with something like fedora
<7> Or Mepis, linspire, Knoppix, PClinuxos.....
<7> etc....
<5> ScoT: anything like urpmi or apt-get for fedora?
<12> yeah it has yum
<12> and you can get apt for it
<7> fedora also has apt-get, which is remarkably similar to apt-get.
<5> Cyrano_De: and for suse anything like that?
<7> Yes, apt-get is all I use for package management in Suse
<5> cool
<5> and do you know for ubuntu ...
<7> ubuntu is debian based. Debian is the distro that to my knowledge created apt.
<7> So, yes.
<5> cool
<5> i'm gonna download em all
<5> but mandriva is pretty cool i find it's what i got now
<7> Many find their current distro to be the coolest.
<5> Cyrano_De: like they got enlightenment and everything for every distro right .. fluxbox...
<7> I'm relatively agnostic.
<5> suse hase got a gdm ?
<5> kdm .. xdm...
<9> Most distros have mostly the same software and SuSE has it all
<5> cool
<7> Most distro's offer a good choice of window managers. While SuSe has gdm and gnome, it is not the best distro for Gnome out of the box.
<5> i use kde...
<7> Suse does have a VERY large ***ortment of packages available from this CDs.
<7> I'm moving to icewm
<5> that coulden't beat kde tho i think
<7> It can when your looking for speed and little memory usage.
<7> icewm is MUCH faster than KDE and uses less than half the memory.
<5> Cyrano_De: you got witch version on suse now
<5> 10.1 beta 3 ?
<5> should i be better of with 10.0 or ill be able to update 10.1 beta3 when the time come's
<7> Which machine? My ldap/fileserver is 9.2, the work laptop is 9.3, the home workstation is OpenSuse 10.0.
<7> I did not like the changes they made to sax in OpenSuse so I do not run it on my work laptop.
<7> OpenSuse is not very good for xinerama (multi-monitor) work.
<7> I have a VERY large desktop at work with the laptop lcd and a 20" CRT.
<3> yo i installed a second floppy and now the first one keeps the light always on
<5> but 10.1 beta is better then 10.0 no
<3> why the ****
<5> newer stuff ...
<7> Not neccecarily. Latest does not always == greatest.
<5> Cyrano_De: so i should go with 10.0 insted of 10.1 or ... i got one peecee one screen a workstation
<7> That is up to you. I can't make that choice for you. Read up on them and make your own mind up.
<5> what so different with 10.1 compared to 10.0
<7> If it is any kind of mission critical need for your machine I would never run a beta program let alone OS on it.
<5> no mission ...
<7> You will have to read up on that at www.opensuse.org. I have not followed any of the developments of Opensuse at all.
<5> i just use my computer to listen to music and stuff
<5> so 10.1 will be good for me
<7> If you plan on helping to develop/debug suse, go with the 10.1 version. If you want to use it and learn Linux, use the 10.0 version.
<7> Any distro will be good for you if you take the time to read and learn it.
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
rdssb
#linux
wine ole error 80004001 fix
ThA_AngE
#apache
#mirc
tanga fut
gnuworld cvs no route to host
arable land unseeded
no adapters present radeon
|
|