| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Comments:
<0> Cuz really, linux keeps kicking my butt and I keep coming back for more.
<1> its like that :)
<0> yeah
<2> just like women :)
<0> Whatcha know about madwifi and wpa_supplicant, Redragon^ ?
<0> Anything indepth?
<1> never messed with it
<0> bla
<3> How to add a subdomain in apache?
<0> Alright then. I guess I'll have to live with *cough* wep for a while.
<1> DoN^MeGa simple, you define a virtualhost for it like you would any domain
<1> to apache it doesn't matter what level of domain/sub domain it is
<0> That reminds me. Did you see that url I posted last night about the 125 mile point to point 802.11b they setup?
<3> Redragon^: Is there any Tutorial I could read over it?
<1> DoN^MeGa look at the documentation at httpd.apache.org
<1> or you can browser around some of the apache stuff on http://server-resources.com/apache.html
<3> sure thanks
<3> Redragon^ I actually don't get it. What to write httpd.conf
<1> you do a virtualhost configuration section
<1> someting like http://paste.getlinuxhelp.org/2094
<3> lemme see
<3> Redragon^ Thanks
<4> to make a subdomain in apache does that matter with bind?
<1> well the sub domain must resolve to an ip
<4> so the box should have bind installed
<1> not necessarily
<1> the name servers can be anywhere
<4> well i cant make it work though
<1> you just have to have the designated name servers configured to resolve the sub domain
<4> i modify the httpd.conf
<1> did you modify the name servers to resolve the sub domain? if not there is nothing you can do to get apache to work
<4> name servers, no i did not
<4> where should i look to modif the ns
<1> who does your dns?
<4> cannot open /etc/resolv.conf
<1> the name servers you use to resolve may not be the name servers authorative over the domain
<1> what name servers are authorative over the domain?
<4> dns1.wchtks.sbcglobal.net
<1> then you will need to contact their admin and have them update the dns to resolve your domain
<4> i dont get it, but thanks
<4> all i need is subdomain like sub.domain.com
<4> on http
<1> the problem is, if sub.domain.com doesn't resolve then it wont work
<4> well the domain works fine
<4> but cant make the subdomain to work it
<1> right, because the domain resolves
<1> try dig sub.domain.com
<1> if it doesn't return anything that is your problem and the dns will have to be updated
<4> works when using apache
<4> yes
<4> dig works fine
<1> it resolves it to your ip?
<4> ;; got answer:
<1> what is the sub domain?
<5> the dmesg reply is way too long but I want to paste it all somewhere
<5> how can I do that
<1> !paste
<6> More than 3 lines? Paste your stuff at http://paste.getlinuxhelp.org/ and then tell us the url it gives you.
<5> I mean like stopping the dmesg reply
<5> copy-ing, then starting the 'process' again
<5> No I do not want to past it here, I want to past it in a e-mail, but it's way too long and I cant copy all of it cause it goes so fast
<1> dmesg|more
<5> ty
<5> and how can I set the kernel file descriptors to 32000?
<1> you can increase the number in /proc/sys/fs/file-max
<7> how can i block arping requests coming from my subnet network ?
<8> Why would you need to?
<9> night all
<7> mwilson to top spoofed atacks to my sistem
<7> and arp poisoning
<7> mwilson to stop spoofed first of all
<1> if your having arp poising issues then you need to investigate those with access to your subnet
<7> i did
<1> since like mac it doesn't permiate beyond your subnet
<7> and is spoofed
<7> using arp proxy
<7> it does
<1> arp simply matches ip to mac, there is no need to propogate beyond a subnet
<7> i have a small /20 from
<10> anybody know if the recent sendmail issue is being expolited?
<7> my isp
<1> thing yes there is
<7> the isp has /18
<1> you need to update
<10> hmmm, I lost my email server on Saturday, it was patched....trying to determin why it went "funny"
<1> fr33z if they are having an arp poisoning issue then they need to investigate it, if they refuse then they could be subject to local prosecution for violating criminal statues
<11> "small" 20? that's still 4096 separate addresses, including network and broadcast.
<1> thing2 if your patched it shouldn't have been a problem
<10> mwilson because if it wasnt yet, then I have a hardware or software error
<1> thats the first sendmail issue in quite some time :)
<10> 3 plus years
<10> if it has been exploted its possible i got a root kit installed
<8> thing2: What difference does that make? You apply the patch.
<1> fr33z also if you block arp and your isp network depends on it for routing you will basically disable your network connection
<10> mwilson diagnostics
<10> i suspect the update I did to the debian system broke the system...
<7> i need to filter
<7> not bloack
<8> fr33z: What makes you think you need to do either one?
<10> but if there is a possibility I got root'd then I want to dig into the that hd and take a look
<10> before I wipe it
<1> thing2 i would run rkhunter and check the system, should show some sign
<10> red: ta will do so, Im booting off a new disk with the old one mounted as hdc...
<1> would also validate key system packages
<10> rkhunter in debain ?
<7> mwilson got other solution?
<10> is rkhunter in debian ?
<1> dont know if their is a deb package or not
<10> k
<8> fr33z: Solution to what? So far, all *I've* seen is you thinking it'd be 'leet to do it.
<7> mwilson solution to arp poisoning
<8> fr33z: And you think you have a problem with poisoning because...?
<7> becaus some of the people in this world do bad thing to you when they get payed
<8> In other words, you have no reason to, you just think it would be 'leet.
<7> the reason is my netork is not doing good because of it
<7> and i do not cacer about you 'leet issues that u have
<7> care*
<7> i just wanna fix my problem and i am stuck
<12> fr33z: you cant control what others are sending on the network
<12> fr33z: find the guy doing it and kick his *** =]
<13> boo
<10> fr33z the chances of someone actively trying to spoil your day is pretty remote
<13> unless you recently divorced a hacker
<10> if they wanted to cause mayhem, i'd suspect they's DoS you, quick and lethal
<13> so, tbird 1400 vs XP 1800
<7> i have good service good uptime that is bad for others bussines
<13> actually, might be a 2100
<10> fr33z in the scale of things, another business attacking you sounds very un-likely
<7> no but a godd sysadmin is also a good hacker
<10> hmm no
<10> they are different skills, both need lots of experience
<7> i did nost say medium admin i sayed god admin
<10> then my conclsuion at this point is you are an idiot
<13> a "god admin" would know better.
<7> hope so
<10> I admin large networks, I dont have time to reseacrh hacking....
<10> in the depth needed to be any good at it anyway
<7> thing2 maybe you do have time
<7> but if you will get payed for it will you do it ?
<7> and hacking does not stand for cracking
<7> 2 separte things
<8> Did anyone mention cracking?
<7> no
<1> fr33z i consider myself a pretty darn good admin and I have nothing in common nor seek to hack in any sense of the term
<7> then you have a caracter
<7> not all have
<1> i have a character?
<7> you might have i dono you
<1> and what is a character?
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#skype
#AllNiteCafe
#london
quotes stubbourn
#c++
#php
#windows
#linuxhelp
#linux
irc ccpoweronline.net !CC
|
|