| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Comments:
<0> humm, i'm reading 20 from the device, and it's outputing more than 100 to the screen.
<1> ataX: I guess the contents of your array is screwed up ?
<2> rhowe: buahahaha
<0> OldMonk: http://rafb.net/paste/results/mcLBPe12.html (dump_ascii)
<1> ataX: stick with the for cycle
<3> ataX: stick to asp
<1> (or that)
<0> OldMonk: asp ?
<3> or vb.net, or something
<0> haha
<1> amazing scripting in perl
<1> =)
<0> OldMonk: i know i **** at the C. but hey..
<3> but what?
<3> pay me, i'll fix it.
<0> i just want to take the output from the original printf and stick it into a variable.
<3> as it is, i'm too busy debugging my javascript program
<0> OldMonk: do you take paypal?
<3> your regular shipment: a container full of coke will do
<0> coke.. what coke? i dont' sell dr00gs.
<0> ./msg OldMonk dude, we use the SSL-Based IRC for that stuff.
<0> oops
<3> .wall who is this masquerading as ataX?
<3> oops
<0> OldMonk: i just want to take the output of printf("%c",((data[i] > 31) && (data[i] < 128)) ? data[i] : '.'); and put it into a variable.
<3> x=((data[i] > 31) && (data[i] < 128)) ? data[i] : '.' ; printf ( "%c" , x ) ;
<3> WHAT do you want to put into the variable anyway?
<0> the contents of data[i]
<3> the character corresponding to the ascii code in data[i] if it is printable?
<3> brb
<4> OldMonk: yeah. but the potential for pain is still there ;)
<5> Rex-kwan-doe?
<4> if that was a joke, I must have missed something
<5> napoleon dynamite... the instructor.. and his beautiful girlfriend..
<4> Comet-: nope. havn't seen that movie
<5> omfg this is hilarious
<5> http://xkcd.com/c149.html
<6> well, and now the time has come to get Sun's JDK going on Ubuntu
<6> euh ;P
<5> hahah man i nearly died.. boss looked over at me.. i hate uncontrollably chuckling
<7> Comet-: work safe?
<5> yes
<7> HAHAHAHAHAHA!
<7> Comet-: that's awesome.
<5> lol
<8> hi
<6> well, either you guys laugh at about everything or my sense of humor is dented ;)
<5> i do laugh at a lot of stuff.. cornier the better in some cases..
<8> i have a problem
<7> Lion-O: or ours is dented.
<8> i have a irc server on a root
<6> SoLo18: piss off
<8> Linux root
<8> and i deleted the filess
<6> SoLo18: we're not going to help you abuse a compromised computer, instead we'll be very happy to track you down and report you.
<6> Ey revie!
<9> evening.
<6> w000 ;) Building Java on Ubuntu the quick&dirty way 8)
<6> peter@ubuntu:~/develop$ dpkg -b /home/peter/develop/debian ./sun-jdk.deb
<6> dpkg-deb: building package `sun-jdk' in `./sun-jdk.deb'.
<9> heh
<2> Rev
<9> Lion-O: want a laugh ?
<9> Nanuq.
<9> [20:21] *SoLo18* is our PC,we not abused of anything
<9> [20:21] *SoLo18* and we deleted the files because we didn`t know how to stop that program
<10> \n
<6> Revenger: rofl
<5> stop the program that deletes your files?
<6> yeah, that is the normal thing to do. I do that everytime with my PC; I try to stop Firefox so I type "dpkg -P mozilla-firefox" but.. If I'm in a hurry I do "rm `which firefox`".
<9> heh
<7> Why do forks and threads exist, and how do they differ?
<6> shutting down MY box is done with rm :P
<6> cycom: google it.
<9> rm /etc/inittab
<7> Lion-O: good answer.
<6> Revenger: thats too easy, it needs to STOP :)
<9> thats what the button on the case is for, no ?
<9> just try to restart that puppy without inittab :P
<11> Revenger: init=/bin/sh
<11> no problem...
<9> smsie: for you and me, no.
<9> for the "broad m***" it is
<11> Revenger: well, who cares about them? They shoulda been paying me to do it for them anyway
<9> oh man. german tv ****s.
<9> now they will re-run MacGyver
<11> s/german//
<11> ALL tv ****s...almost without exception
<6> Revenger: hmmm, IMO the TV isn't that bad, they do have some nice programs. Its the dubbing which ****s IMO :P
<5> i cancelled my cable years ago.. PBS is nice though
<5> its all about the primetime
<12> communism is wondefull why linux users reject it?
<11> because anarchy works better
<13> anarchy doesn't work.
<6> Anarchy in the UK does ;)
<13> But hey, let the world find out on its own and have some fun in the meantime
<11> PolarWolf: the free software development model essentially is anarchic...and it works fairly well
<13> smsie: Naw, that's not anarchy
<13> smsie: You might have noticed that a lot of project leaders and committees are steering it
<11> anarchy does work (and work damn well) in very small (say 2-300 people) communities. It just doesn't scale
<11> PolarWolf: anarchy doesn't mean without steering. Nobody is compelled however. Everyone does what they feel like doing
<14> anarchy only works in small communities where everyone is dedicated to the concept
<13> Same with communism
<11> yep
<14> one person who doesnt wish to participate rapidly ****s it up for everyone
<11> pretty much like communism
<6> and therefor anarchy won't scale and certainly won't last forever ;)
<11> works very well in a small community
<13> Lion-O: What does?
<13> Either way, we need something else. Democracy doesn't work very well either
<6> PolarWolf: good point. Freedom seems to do a good job for us so far.
<11> capitalism doesn't scale either :)
<11> what we have is a mishmash os what;s (mainly) common-sense. It works (reasonably) well
<13> Yeah, the world is just peachy
<13> Lots of common sense there
<11> no, the world ****s. It *could* be a lot ****ier though
<14> what was churchills quip on democracy?
<13> Who needs those pesky peasants anyway
<13> Always whining
<14> "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time."
<5> i'd actually prefer a democracy over a Republic
<13> Comet-: Even a fake one?
<13> Like the ones we have?
<14> A direct democracy wouldnt work
<14> too many things to vote on
<13> TenBaseT: True, that
<5> well the US is a republic
<11> democracy doesn;t scale either
<11> well, supposedly
<14> the problem with a direct democracy would mean so many votes that apathy would rule and only the few percent of people who really had something to win or lose with any particular legislation would turn up to vote.
<13> Which begs for the question why it has to scale? Most of the problems we face seems to come from scaling up concepts which aren't scaleable.
<14> you'd have special interests even worse than today
<13> Lets descale
<15> PolarWolf: A ****ing Men. Put the power back in the hands of the states.
<6> w00t, I got java back up & running
<11> PolarWolf: it has to scale because we live in communities of millions. Not hundreds
<5> seems like atleast with a democracy, the people "think" they have some peace of mind by being able to blabber their opinions
<13> siglite: Or smaller
<16> Lion: WOW!
<15> PolarWolf: yep. in .us, it's all reversed. Fed trumps state trumps local.
<11> when we lived in communities of hundreds, virtually any system would work
<15> should be the other way 'round.
<11> there are a fair number that do anyway
<14> I used to thhink that state governments were all incompetant boobs and all power should reside in the thans of the federal government but I reconsidered my entire stance about 5 years ago
<6> firefox is pretty odd though as it doesn't list this as an extension. hmmz
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#london
#linux
centos remove eth2
#AllNiteCafe
#skype
#linuxhelp
#gentoo
#c++
#linuxhelp
#php
|
|