| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Comments:
<0> heh
<1> used for wlan ?
<1> dont renember the package name
<2> raidgh0st: 'iwconfig'
<1> yes and the package name is?
<0> iwconfig is similar to ifconfig but for wireless devices
<2> raidgh0st: I hope you do realize that this can differ per distribution... appearantly not.
<0> I think the iwconfig manpage describes that
<1> Sagoro: i have to install the iwconfig first
<1> for debian
<1> but i dont renember the package name
<0> have fun
<2> raidgh0st: man apt-cache / http://packages.debian.org/
<1> Thanks
<1> packages.debian.org is down
<1> i repeat is down
<2> so apt-cache it is.
<1> i know how to use apt-cache
<2> amazing
<1> apt-cache search iwconfig gives a blank line
<2> hence the need to read the manpage.
<2> but you're obviously the expert here :P
<0> build not done yet
<1> So i wonder why the PIP are you telling me to read the man page
<0> WTF are you doing?!?!
<2> raidgh0st: because the apt-cache command can provide an answer to your question.
<3> hm, got port knocking to work right the first try without locking myself out. go me ;)
<2> raidgh0st: but since you're too ****ing stupid to realize it can do more than a mere 'search' I guess thats no use.
<1> i am not stupid
<1> I have used the apt-cache
<0> You're wrong
<0> people are stupid
<0> period
<1> then you are too
<3> interesting
<1> some times
<0> Yes
<3> raidgh0st: first, you need to apt-get update to get a current package list
<1> RelDrgn: allready done that
<3> also interesting
<0> not very
<0> deflated ball
<1> seems like mister freekzz is a bit Stupid today
<4> need to display the cpu temp..
<1> i didnt say anything wrong
<3> raidgh0st: try apt-cache search wireless then
<0> heh
<1> weee... :-)
<1> wireless-tools
<1> *gonna write it as a tatoo on my finger
<2> and another act of sheer rocket science has been performed in #linux, how amazing. you could hear the braincells creak from way up here.
<3> raidgh0st: next time you want to search for something, think of keywords to search for.
<1> hehe...
<1> i will renember that
<2> no you won't.
<1> Lion-O: I will
<1> did leave windows to try debian
<2> just like you probably haven't read the manpage for apt-cache again to search for the option which might have been usefull.
<1> debian is more stable
<2> alas, enough of that.
<1> What the **** you thinking? I have read the apt-cache
<1> but i did forget it
<1> I am tired
<1> Worked since 02:00 o clock this morning
<2> manpages aren't meant to memorize.
<2> 42
<4> Temp.= 28.2, 29.1, 21.6; Rot.= 5769, 0, 0 | Vcore = 2.23, 2.24; Volt. = 3.33, 5.08, 11.17, 0.00, 0.00 : Now what's what here? anyone an idea what the cpu temp is?
<4> that's the mbmon output btw
<2> yoz: 42 :P
<4> Lion-O: aaah ;)
<2> yoz: anyway, no idea here. I'd pick 29.1 being the highest which is usually the CPU but thats a very wild guess here.
<2> and a bit low for a CPU as well
<4> Lion-O: *nod* a labeled output would have been nice..
<5> yoz: the PE is working nice so far
<4> K_F: heh I do believe.. nice thingie ;)
<4> K_F: now tell me how to display the cpu temp either with lm-sensor or mbmon ;)
<6> hi
<5> yoz: I have gkrellm
<7> sup gay people
<8> itokyox: i'd probably say your time allowed in here
<2> and as usual this pos keeps splitting
<7> just joking
<5> itokyox: I don't really see any humor in it
<2> schitzo: have you looked into the 'System Directory Proxy Server' yet ? its part of the JES as well.
<2> itokyox: another joke like that and we'll have some jokes on your expense as well.
<8> Lion-O: no, haven't looked at that
<2> schitzo: from what I can tell it might do what you want, a sort of proxy for ldap. including its own firewall so it seems.
<8> Lion-O: well, I sort of scrapped that idea. If our TTS ****tards can't get their act together to let us have access to AD I'll just do something else
<2> schitzo: *nod*
<8> Lion-O: I need to look at how the LDAP forwawrding stuff is supposed to work
<2> hmm, and I need to get a beer :P
<5> Lion-O: beat you to it
<2> damn
<2> K_F: so thats where my beer went ;)
<5> cold directly from the refridgerator
<2> hmmm :-)
<4> a coma
<2> hehe ;)
<4> bah the turtle.. brb ;)
<2> uh oh... a teenage mutant ninja turtle on the loose ! :)
<2> if yoz isn't carefull it'll barricade itself in his shoe and won't come out for a while 8)
<4> Lion-O: hehe yeah ;)
<2> ey there kosmo
<9> Did OxD drop off the technical map or something? No blog posts since October, very little IRC activity...
<2> hmm, speaking of blogs.. I guess I should work up alittle on mine 8)
<9> Lion-O: Link?
<2> ThomasM: I know he's been busy lately, but I have seen him pop in and out every now and then.. afaik he's still active.
<2> ThomasM: nekonet website :P
<9> I get really bored on Friday afternoons, when the accounting software starts crashing like mad and interrupting my coding, so I've taken to intentionally wasting time knowing that I'll be called on shortly, anyway
<2> perhaps I should give the latest mambo release another try :P
<10> can i spawn a sub-shell from bash without executing the bash binary?
<2> serenity_: what do you mean by 'sub-shell' ?
<4> Lion-O: that's what I run as my homepage.. quite neat. didn't figure if it's actually running with php5 though
<10> Lion-O: another shell i can command through pipes, for example
<10> like "echo ls|bash"
<2> serenity_: that makes no sense.
<11> oh great
<11> a scam/spam by snailmail
<11> http://www.grumbletext.co.uk/vt.php?t=1331&subj=complaints+Capquest+Debt+Recovery+complaint
<11> looks like it's this shower of cowboys
<2> serenity_: so my guess is that it also isn't possible. you can't pipe something to an already running process.
<10> Lion-O: of course, i want to generate and send more complex programs through the pipe
<10> Lion-O: that's why i want to spawn a sub-shell, a separate process
<2> serenity_: just running a script file already spawns another shell.
<2> serenity_: anyway, no idea what you plan to do but it sounds too horrible for my taste :P
<12> how can I print lines from file x that do not occur in file y
<12> please
<10> Lion-O: doesn't running a script also invoke the shell binary?
<2> mr_tea: 'man diff' comes to mind.
<12> I have been looking on google and trying diff and cmp
<12> Lion-O so I should be able to do it with diff
<10> my point is, if i fork it off instead of executing it, i can exploit the copy-on-write semantics of the kernel so the sub-shells don't eat up that much ram
<13> http://Radio-FLY.uS.To:8000/listen.pls <---
<8> damn, beat me to it
<10> is that really a _that_ horrible thing to do?
<2> serenity_: yes.
<10> what's wrong with it
<2> serenity_: too much to waste my time on. perhaps someone else likes the idea, but IMO you should start looking up the differences between spawning another process and.. oh well :P
<10> Lion-O: i'll waste mine
<10> i like simple, mighty concepts
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
yoga (lawls)
install curl slackware
#squid
linux Too much work on interrupt
da-mi-o gratis
#teens
msn with cam
oldjac
#chatzone
#linuxhelp
|
|