| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Comments:
<0> CCIE maybe
<0> but that is kinda too high for me
<1> ccie lol
<2> hmm. I could be misremembering the acronym :)
<2> google seems to know the term
<3> Some1 here to gelp me?
<0> DaveHowe: heh, i dont knnow it
<4> [some1] No such nick
<0> i only got CCNA/DA/AI/NP
<2> eg - http://eplanetlabs.com/ccne.html
<5> gelp?
<3> Tron how can i block an ip using ip tables to acces my machine using port 80
<0> DaveHowe: cisco.com doesnt know it though ;) http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/search/search.pl?searchPhrase=CCNE+certification&x=0&y=0&nv=Search+All+cisco.com%23%23cisco.com&nv=Technical+Support+%26+documentation%23%23cisco.com%23TSD&language=en&country=US&accessLevel=Guest&siteToSearch=cisco.com
<4> Narayana: "man iptables" / www.iptables.org
<0> DaveHowe: so probably it's a third party certification
<5> Narayana: 1 ip address in particular? Or all of them?
<3> 1 ip
<0> DaveHowe: which, imo, 3rd party cisco cert is a no no ;)
<0> brb, $boss in datacentre again
<5> Narayana: You'll need to read the iptables manual, and also the documentation at www.iptables.org as Lion-O says.
<6> hmm. just got an invite to an office party by a boss who used to be a coworker..
<5> Narayana: WHy do you need to block just 1 ip address in particular?
<6> it's a bloody multi-day event ;)
<3> u dont know the command?
<2> tavi-san: it was an official cert when I was looking at following the cisco cert path about four years ago. it may have been discontinued or renamed since then
<3> cause its flooding me with guest book messages
<2> Narayana: we know the command. but we aren't a help service for people who can't be bothered to google for simple answers
<3> DaveHowe i dont understand english so well
<3> and also linux i dont know so well
<3> i will realy appreciate if u will help me here
<3> i know you can find any answer u want at google
<2> try "iptables -D INPUT -s <ip address> -j DROP"
<3> well can some1 here help me?
<3> ok w8 :)
<2> but if you don't know that, you obiously don't know enough about iptables to be trusted with it :)
<3> iptables: Bad rule (does a matching rule exist in that chain?)
<2> oops
<2> try "iptables -I INPUT -s <ip address> -j DROP"
<2> typo - and a bad one :)
<2> http://www.netadmintools.com/html/8iptables.man.html
<2> should be capital I (insert rule) not capital D (delete)
<3> well i didnt gave any error
<3> but i must w8 a little to see if he dont spam anymore
<2> iptables -L will list your current rules
<2> Narayana: leetisms like w8 are a kickbanning offence here - I would advise not using them
<3> i know it was something with iptables -i INPUT ip -j DROP -p 80 REJECT
<7> Narayana: just rtfm already.
<3> rtfm ?
<3> read the ****ing manual ? :)))
<3> hahaha
<3> better i think i will flood his *** a little
<3> :)))
<3> mdea
<8> heh :)
<1> how much does ccnp trained administrator earns?...
<1> like salary
<4> I think this once again validates a ban on that lame piece of excuse for an ISP.
<1> sorry
<8> Lion-O then why don't you set a ban for *!*@*.ipt.aol.com?
<2> Arcadio: check your closest jobsite :)
<4> Xeon: thats what I meant
<0> Jesus, so freaking bad
<0> and i smell that dude was a .ro after the "mdea"
<9> Lion-O **** retard i was asking for help and u are banning helpless ppls, **** morron
<9> get lost dude go home and **** your wife
<4> ppls ?
<0> rofl, he needed help for HACKING some
<4> could someone please explain to me 'ppls' and 'morron' ? ;-)
<0> he cant do anything more than his script
<0> and his buffer overflow exploit probably
<8> tavi-san for sure
<2> Lion-O: I would, but then you would kick me for using crappy txtspeek ;)
<4> in the mean time we might want to write the owner of bof.sk
<5> Indeed.
<5> Nice of it to reveal it's hacked machines.
<5> s/it's/its/
<0> ive kinda had it with writing to the administrators
<6> tavi-dude
<0> after some retarded dude ctcp flooded me from 987987 hosts from a shell provider
<2> don't undernet maintain a relay list?
<0> and i wrote to that mofo admin, and he said "he paid, he can do whatever he wishes"
<10> tavi-san: no way
<0> retarded ****, using his machines
<4> DaveHowe: that would be nekonet. Undernet really doesn't give a flying ****.
<0> yeah i still have the email somewhere
<0> wlf-dude
<0> shoot\
<2> Lion-O: I tried that once but gave myself a groin injury....
<11> $%^$%$#B toolchain
<2> we agree in general sigmoid - but why in particular?
<0> Jostein: know what the funny part was, i sent him every single log about his network bots, and he didnt do a thing
<10> tavi-san: thats a pretty bad admin
<0> i took this in #zt and nothing happened
<10> tavi-san: you should have mailed/called his link provider :P
<10> seriously though. admins like that should be shot
<2> tavi-san: my usual response there is "that's fine, I don't really care either. all I really need is a postal address to serve the papers, his or yours (your choice)"
<0> Jostein: after swearing a bit, i kinda gave up getting angry with that
<0> doesnt worth being angry for something on IRC
<7> tavi-san: just mail abuse-exploits@undernet.org with the list, they reacted pretty quickly in my case.
<0> Clone: i did that too, dont know if anything happened, but no reply came back
<2> http://www.yourdailymedia.com/media/1140601440/The_Package <--- trivial, but kept me amused for five minutes or so
<11> uclibc I just wanna $#%## it
<2> sigmoid: you should keep perversions like that to yourself. goats maybe, but uclibc? that's just sick man....
<7> tavi-san: hehe, they responded to me the next day.. unlucky you or lucky me I guess..
<0> Clone: heh
<10> DaveHowe: old news :P
<10> DaveHowe: and pretty lame end. "you are safe. for now"
<1> i m from .ro
<0> doesnt matter really, the real ****tards are the "omg admins" that let people do that, AND the ones that keep their servers which stand on a huge bw protected improperly
<1> i ve seen something about .ro above
<10> tavi-san: yeah
<10> Arcadio: in here you'll here all kinds of stuff about .ro, and most of it aint nice
<2> Arcadio: its the 98% of bad apples on the .ro subnet that give the rest a bad name.
<2> Arcadio: at least that's a better ratio than AOL though :)
<10> heh
<11> lol
<11> dude, you let you imagination go
<10> DaveHowe: aol -is- banned here right? while .ro aint?
<2> sigmoid: I would rather not. some things are Just Too Gross
<10> DaveHowe: so all in all, we are pretty fair :P
<2> Jostein: we allow both in, usually. although aol should be banned :)
<2> Jostein: at least September has ended, even though its really too late to save usenet now...
<10> DaveHowe: heh
<10> Ive abused easynews on occations, but that was for alt.binary.* stuff
<2> my provider ****s for usenet though. now I have a Wage, I suspect I will buy in usenet service from a dedicated provider of same
<10> DaveHowe: those are still around with a decent news provider
<0> DaveHowe: haha
<2> Jostein: most isps used to give decent usenet service as a matter of course. now you have to buy it from elsewhere. that ****s.
<10> DaveHowe: *nod*
<10> DaveHowe: however doing full news mirrors these days are insane
<10> DaveHowe: that takes a -lot- of dedicated BW and space
<10> there's a reason most ISPs dont bother
<0> i smell an incoming question...
<2> Jostein: actually, no. there are some providers (particularly in the us, although I believe in central europe too) who do a full feed via satellite link
<2> Jostein: so your bandwidth usage is limited to just new traffic from your own users, being sent to the provider
<12> hi is there a way to have write access my ntfs partition from linux ?
<2> sastrup. yes, but its a Bad Idea
<2> sastrup: there is about a 5% chance you will corrupt ntfs that way. don't do it.
<2> sastrup: in most cases, its easier and cleaner to use a fat32 interchange partition or use ntfs read-only in linux, then ext2/3 read only in windoze
<0> ok, how the **** is this possible? $boss thought his link was terminated from the patch panel, he went in there and "solved" it
<10> DaveHowe: ext2 read/write worked OKish in windows
<0> solve == ****ed up 3 other links one from the DC
<10> DaveHowe: and probably 1000% safer than doing NTFS in linux :P
<12> DaveHowe: While installing Daemon tools (which did something with my SCSI drivers) and then installing Norton AV 2006 and rebooting, my system only gives me a blank screen after ROM check
<2> Jostein: yup. I got my link to that from you iirc, and it works fine
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#teens
#linux
12WHAT ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON ADVENTURE FEATURES THE SHIP CALLED COVENANT?
what is: normal body temperature for an adult
naim differ in signedness
panzer 2.4 irc
xorg.conf+1280x768@60hz
linux codec dump
mariuda
+css +side by side +divs
|
|