| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> and as i said.. its already ejected.. the system was rebooting to start
<0> the install was suposed to be manly done
<1> and u just couldnt log in?
<1> ntr> then it says "*Id "1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes"
<1> that usually happens
<1> when u flood the login prompt
<1> by pressing enter
<1> :)
<0> well. no. i didnt egt to any loginscreen
<0> the text i pasted earlier apperas on the screen again and again and againg.. then it gives the "*Id "1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes" mesasge
<2> someone can come help me why internet config...TY
<1> that's really weird...
<1> dont u have a shell during the install?
<1> on ubuntu?
<0> a shell? sorry. never used linux before :) dont know what that is.
<3> are you not able to log into the root?
<0> a user account? thats the last thing i made i think... before it ejected the CD and told me to reboot by pressing a specific key..
<0> i created an account with username and p***word..
<3> alright
<3> what is your problem then?
<0> ill try to type the error message again...
<0> "debconf: DbDriver "temlatedb": could not open"
<0> "/var/cache/debconf/tempates.dat"
<0> "info: Switching console charset mapping to c/usr/sbin/base-config: line31:/varlog/baseconfig.timings Read-only file system"
<0> that text is looped a few times. then i says "* Id "1" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes"
<0> then it gets stucked there for... yeah. 5 minutes and loops again
<3> I dont know, I can't help you there. try googling it.
<0> the whole thing?
<0> i tried to google the first bit... but nothing of interest...
<4> honestly sounds like a broken install. verify the iso you burned was not corrupted then try reinstalling would be my advice
<4> there should be a md5sum or other hash you can use to make sure your iso is ok
<0> well... ok. thanks. i think ill just redownload the file.. dont know how to use hash sums...
<4> and dbet another broken iso ?
<4> bah
<0> well :) the official file on theire homepage should be ok+
<0> ?
<4> the install docs tell how to verify
<4> i'm sure the file there is, you need to ensure wyat you have on your local drive is good
<0> ok. thanks all!
<0> what would linux be without guys like you who can help :)
<5> how can i allow apache read files in /root/../?
<6> Azr4el: RTFM
<6> this is a very bad idea.
<5> i know. but i must solve.
<6> Azr4el: then rtfm. If you know what you're doing you'd easily solve this on your own.
<7> Azr4el: Solve it some non-retarded way
<7> Azr4el: There is *NO* reason whatsoever that apache would have to read files under /root/ that could not be far more elegantly solved otherwise.
<6> unless ofcourse you're simply a rotard scriptkiddie.
<5> :)
<5> ough :(
<5> if i move the file in /root.. outside of it, is it more safe?
<6> depends.
<7> What is this "the file" that you're talking about?
<6> I suggest reading up on how permissions and useraccounts work on Linux.
<7> And WHY, if its security is so paramount, are you enabling it to be accessed via the world wide retardweb?
<8> that would be wwr wtf is that
<5> its a log file. my php script that working under apache will read that file and print out to page.
<6> logfiles don't go in /root in the first place.
<8> good, making /root readable to apache is a great idea.. I commend you
<7> Azr4el: and *WHY* in heaven's name are you logging to a file under /root ?
<5> i installed sometings under /root
<8> Azr4el: sweet
<5> and i cant move them somewhere
<7> Azr4el: That was ****ing retarded.
<7> And that's bull****.
<8> Azr4el: dont forget to run either very new or very old apache releases. it's not like anyone will try exploiting your little webserver
<7> Either you're a script kiddie or you're a complete ****ing imbecile, and either way I don't think it's useful to help you any further.
<5> :) well
<5> thanks for offers
<5> i'll move my files
<8> move them to / that's the best directory to give apache access to
<5> thanks safemode
<8> yea, then you can install a program called dict, and run dict sarcasm and read up on the output
<9> anyatok picsaja\
<9> ti kurvak
<9> you mother ****er ***hole
<9> bitch head
<10> hehe
<10> had fun last night, eh?
<11> yeah
<11> and it feels good knowing I have -nothing- to do today, so I -can- actually have a hangover :P
<10> hehe
<11> naaaah
<10> well, I did anyways :)
<11> spending too much time working, makes you easy to satisfy, I guess
<11> lol
<10> think "koffert"
<10> that is... I have yet to honor hint #1
<11> gotcha
<10> that dude knows me too well
<11> Anyway. I even managed to pay for 4 cabs yesterday :P
<10> hehe
<10> Jostein_: why?
<11> 1 to the place we went. one home. one to work to get my keys for my apt and one more home :P
<10> hehe
<11> I didnt feel stupid at all when I realized I had no keys
<11> woo
<11> how so?
<10> I fixed the issue for myself a long time ago, but figured if I have the problem others probably have
<10> Jostein_: http://www3.kfwebs.net/paypal.png
<11> ah
<10> div#navPrimary {width: 60em ! important;} in userContent.css fixed it for me
<10> but I thought I'd be a nice dude and let them know
<10> I won't be that stupid again
<11> heh
<11> their response wasnt "thank you for helping us out"?
<10> nope
<10> I still haven't gotten to anyone who has any clue what they're doing
<11> ah
<10> just a tech-support representative that has no clue about web development
<11> htey manage to **** up a lot, dont they?
<10> first response was that it was a fraud site
<10> "I am well aware of the concept of phishing and its implications. I'm
<10> talking about what seems to be an User Interface bug in your primary
<10> website that has effect using the Mozilla Firefox web browser on the
<10> GNU/Linux Operating system."
<10> ... at least with my settings
<10> "Would you please escalate this matter to the appropariate web designers?"
<11> I see
<11> they didnt, ey?
<10> presumably not
<10> oh wait
<10> I've been talking with multiple dudes
<10> one Vijji and one Gary
<11> brb.
<10> hehe
<10> uh, sure
<10> whyzzyrd: it doesn't have windows terminal server I presume?
<12> How might I go about it? (apart from metasploiting it).
<10> whyzzyrd: phsysical access
<12> nope.
<10> not necessarily you, but a trusted party
<12> K_F: if metasploit can do it when there's a hole, I can do it with the admin p***word.
<10> not necessarily
<10> metasploit would probably use the hole to bind a local connection, think of it like SSH
<10> but that doesn't mean you would be able to without using the exploit
<13> hmm i guess you could...
<10> whyzzyrd: if the server is properly configured you wouldn't gain administrative privileges
<10> so it wouldn't be able to install the application
<10> but the webserver hasn't
<10> (one way to do something would be to script it)
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#mirc
#linux
#linux
#MissKitten
#AllNiteCafe
#linux
#java
jin kelli
#AllNiteCafe
Liba Maltija
|
|
