| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Comments:
<0> Ka-bar: thank you very much hottie
<1> c-wolf: Ill bring my steel toped boots then.
<0> Ka-bar: you actually could have used some of the things i did over the years
<1> s/toped/toed/
<0> probably most some kaspersky products
<2> If i am not wrong, mostly BitDefender products...
<0> kosmo: sidenote-she was 20 when i met her, virgin, so freaking good educated with true belives in one man only concept, parents are like her
<0> kosmo: scholarship girl at probably the ****tiest hardest uni in romania
<0> kosmo: and hawt, with some jealousy problems, but that's like nothing
<2> tavi-san : What you describe there is a conservative conceopt of education...
<2> s/conceopt/concept
<0> c-wolf: yes einstein
<1> tavrawk.
<3> but does she put out?
<0> c-wolf: but fortunately, she believed in those too, cause im sure there are 878787 parents with the same concepts with whores as their kids
<0> D-side: dude, i am engaged to her and im only 24
<3> tavi-san: that doesnt answer my question. :D
<3> tavi-san: dont worry, i dont really want an answer, i just wanted to ask the question :)
<0> D-side: hrm, i may miss the meaning
<0> refrain it if you may
<3> yeah I think thats a pretty good idea.
<0> Ka-bar: speaking of what you said about me, i was here long before you were :P
<3> uh oh. a rank puller.
<2> tavi-san : Sure, but i think, nowadays people should 'life more' , so the one-man-cocept fails here, it is imho. obsolete...
<0> c-wolf: i sincerely dont know what life will have to offer, but i certainly hope for that
<0> D-side: o.O
<2> Nice point :)
<4> D-side: there is always someone older around to put them down anyway
<3> wlfshmn: usually.
<5> tavi-san, :)
<3> not like it matters really.
<0> of course it doesnt, just a sidenote to what he said just all
<1> ok
<1> that was lame
<1> tavi-san: anywho, very cool. Good luck to you man.
<6> kosmo! tavi! wlf! D-side! Ka-bar!
<3> Nanuq!
<1> tavi-san: since I got disconnected, I forgot what I was going to tell you earlier,
<1> Nanuq: ello
<6> so I've checked out the new old grocery store ;)
<6> good prices, very basic service. works for me.
<0> kosmo: thanks you
<0> kosmo: what was lame?
<1> that is all you need in a grocery store.
<7> i was wondering if anyone knew of a web site dedicated to hosting dedicated game servers under linux?
<1> tavi-san: getting disconnected.
<0> hi Nanuq, sorry for earlier my friend (yesterday) didnt mean to offend you in any way
<6> tavi-san: eh?
<0> Nanuq: been talking to you for ages didnt think you would get upset or anything
<6> tavi-san: oh yeah your /msg. **** man, not much offends me.
<6> tavi-san: at least these days ;)
<0> Nanuq: ok, sorry again :)
<6> tavi-san: What I didn't get is why you thought I was offended. It was bloody slapstick comedy on #linux. Since when is that offensive?
<0> btw, what the hell is dawggie doing? havent seen him in a while, not here not on #cisco either
<1> we should start boarding soon.
<8> tavi-san: eeeew... ;)
<6> kosmo: boarding?
<1> Nanuq: travelling today.
<6> kosmo: ircing from the airport?
<0> Nanuq: you said to not injure you, and i was just messing with you a bit :)
<1> Nanuq: damned skippy.
<6> kosmo: thought that was a brand of peanut butter.
<6> kosmo: surely you mean laggy?
<1> that was the first boarding call.
<6> kosmo: where y'going to?
<1> Nanuq: it is laggy. the wireless is free but slow.
<1> Nanuq: San Joaquin Valley
<1> oops. wrong plane.
<1> but still we are 35 minutes out for departure.
<6> kosmo: what craft? 737?
<1> I just wonder if I am still gonn abe on the 777 from ORD to SFO
<1> Nanuq: 737-300 from ROC to ORD
<6> Oooh, 777.
<6> kosmo: I like the 777s
<1> Nanuq: I have no idea if it will be the 777 or not.
<1> Nanuq: ive never been on one. my favorite plane at the moment is a 757.
<1> I know the 777 is a wide body (which I hate) but I have never seen one in the flesh either
<6> kosmo: I'm talking a piloting perspective, not p***enger. ;)
<1> Nanuq: uh, you havent flown a 777. Youve flown an X-Plane simulation of a 777 :p
<6> kosmo: yeah yeah
<1> Nanuq: Ive flown a 172 in a sim, and ive flown a 172. no comparison.
<6> kosmo: yeah yeah
<6> it was a 767 that I'd taken to .uk
<1> Nanuq: see, I dont like those either.
<6> kosmo: Not like I had much of a choice. :)
<1> Nanuq: I know. I get this ill feeling that I will be stuck on a 76 from ORD to SFO.
<6> kosmo: wouldn't those be more for long haul, trans-oceanic flights?
<9> yeah, I can say that too. I got to yank on a citation yoke for a while and it's nothing at all like a sim
<1> the travelocity tracking info says that where it is coming from it is a B752, which would be just fine by me
<10> what is wrong with the following zone file: http://iasi.us/zone1.txt ?
<1> TenBaseT: I had fun flying the 172.
<6> TenBaseT: Well, when I can afford to, I just might try the real deal.
<1> TenBaseT: and the 150. the 150 was a bit scary :)
<6> TenBaseT: But virtual fuel doesn't cost much. ;)
<6> kosmo: how so? nothing near the power?
<1> Nanuq: the 150 was an old, small plane
<9> the 150 lacks the command authority of the 172, it seems to me
<1> very small, very close quarters.
<6> kosmo: How does that compare to the 152?
<1> TenBaseT: yeah, it was more slow to respond
<9> and yeah, theres 150 airframes from the 1950s still in the air
<1> Nanuq: basically the same plane. I dont know if the 150 I flew was a 152 or not. it was just a 15x machine
<6> kosmo: ah okay
<6> kosmo: If I were to buy a craft, it'd probably be something from Piper
<11> ISTR something about 150s being mostly devoid of avionics
<11> and the 172s shipping with at least one nav radio standard
<6> heya sig
<1> siglite: uh, the avionics were sparse, but he has had a Garmin GPS nav device add on.
<9> the 152 is just a 150 with a lycoming instead of a continental. The orginal continental engine is designed to run on 87 octane, not avgas
<10> isn't there any channel called airplanes or something... I think this is linux :-s
<4> TenBaseT: bah, half the russian airlines fleet must be from about then
<9> wlfshmn: which is another reason not to fly aeroflop
<6> flachi: Linux based avionics ;)
<1> the cabin of the 150 is VERY SMALL.
<9> s/p/t
<10> yeah, sure...
<1> overweight people dont belong in a 150.
<1> or anyone much taller than 6'
<4> TenBaseT: 'avgas' is the indefinite for mof 'exhaust fume', in swedish ;)
<6> Heh, imagine recompiling a kernel and rebooting, during a landing?
<6> hey wlf
<9> all the cessnas from back then are sparse on avionics. hell, they're STILL sparse on avionics, a modern avionics stack can represent half the cost of the plane.
<1> TenBaseT: being on the yoke of a Baron is an adventure :)
<4> TenBaseT: Actually, aeroflot is supposed to be the good one. It's when you find yourself flying in one of the smaller airlines, those that buy the planes that aeroflot doesn't dare to fly anymore, that you are in deap trouble ;)
<6> siglite: Oh you've got the 29?
<9> http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=201357
<11> kosmo: dude, that'd rule.
<11> Nanuq: yeah
<9> There's a picture of a 150 panel
<6> siglite: That's cool.
<6> siglite: That's ****in' quick. Where'd you get it from?
<1> siglite: I had a friend of mine that had a Baron... unfortunately, he kind of died of cancer :(
<9> tsk tsk, GPS is still not supposed to be a primary nav tool
<11> there's some dude over at yeager that has a mooney bravo, he buzzes my house occasionally at a pretty good clip
<11> I bet that's a fun plane to fly
<11> it flies well in the sims
<9> oh sweet jesus. This is just about the most frightening thing I have ever seen
<9> The 152 was a response to availability problems with 80/87 octane fuel, and used the 150's fuselage coupled with a Lycoming O-235 running on 100 Octane.
<9> The 152 replaced the 150 from 1977 and remained in production until late 1985. It too was progressively updated, offered in A152 Aerobat form
<9> I'm unable to seperate the concept of being upside-down in a 152 from the concept of being about to die.
<11> lol
<3> no payments for 6mos at newegg... mmm.
<6> siglite: *poek*
<9> I mean, really, If you've ever been in one of those things, just imagine trying to do some high-speed **** in one, like standing it on its tail
<11> Nanuq: one of the vendors listed on the panasonic site. I called 'em and was like "I need a 29 yesterday." The next day aired me one.
<6> siglite: Sweet.
<6> siglite: Is it built as tough as the glossy suggests?
<11> TenBaseT: speaking of, I wonder if yeager or mcbride was in town the other day
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
Opteler
Qt WM_MESSAGE
#london
#apache
seasoning that is mentioned more that 30 times in the bible
#chatzone
#java
#gentoo
#linux
#php
|
|