| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Comments:
<0> ls colors are the ****
<1> Sagoro: Or just turn it off in the global file.
<0> ThomasM: scroll up :)
<2> Sagoro: they give a plain ls much more information, so they cant be all ****y.
<3> lol
<0> ThomasM: Coma and I have already been through that :)
<1> Sagoro: And I love vim's syntax highlighting, as well. :P
<0> ThomasM: I can't stand it
<0> personal preferences, obviously
<2> bikeshed discussion, obviously ;)
<0> oh yeah...and hlsearch in vim gets on my nerves too
<0> :)
<1> Sagoro: You like the frankenstein message this morning?
<0> ThomasM: I vaguely remember it
<0> ThomasM: was it the first one?
<1> Sagoro: Yep.
<1> "Sagoro: daddy frankenstein this is ****ing lame... work doesn even allow outbound pings on this"
<1> I'm going to start using that as an explitive, I think. "Daddy frankenstein, this **** ****s."
<0> hehe
<4> so what stuff can people do on Mirc
<5> redhat_user: who cares about that, mirc being some windows app
<4> lol
<5> Sagoro: turns out to be reasonably simple to get rid of ls colours =)
<0> Coma: Yep, it's set in the global vimrc file
<4> even still it can still be used for some other stuff that chatting
<0> thanks
<4> *than
<0> Coma: It is, indeed simple to get rid of ls colors :)
<0> Coma: If finally got on my nerves enough to figure it out
<5> Sagoro: yuh, set LS_COLOR to 'none'
<1> redhat_user: And? How is that at _all_ relevant to the even the discussion _you_ started?
<2> Sagoro: not a fan of pretty prompt colors too I presume?
<1> Now prompt colors are just annoying.
<5> Sagoro: weird thing is, I can't find where it's set in the first place
<1> I do, however, like my hardstatus line in screen to denote certain things (like the active window) with color.
<4> i dont know im am just curios
<0> Clone_: No, colors are a pet peeve for me
<1> Coma: I usually find a fancy switch in /etc/profile for alias ls='ls --color=auto'
<0> Coma: In Red Hat, the ls colors are defined in /etc/profile.d/colorls.*
<5> heh
<0> Did I mention that I don't like Red Hat?
<5> just discovered it's debian's default ~/.bashrc that does this
<5> eval `dircolors -b`
<5> alias ls='ls --color=auto'
<0> heh
<2> Coma: it checks your term iirc.
<5> yay, all pretty again!
<2> Coma: and enables it accordingly.
<1> redhat_user: We are all very pleased to see you press that button. Could you do it twice?
<2> ugh.
<1> bleah
<5> clone: so it's my xterm-color to blame? ;)
<1> Should that be an automatic trigger for HH? It'd sure be nice.
<5> where's the fun in that?
<5> if you have everything automated you might aswell do without ops
<6> HH bans on the trout slap? *chuckle*
<5> no, but I do
<6> ah ;)
<5> hoi cheeks
<7> Coma :-D
<1> Sagoro: You sure see things in black and white.
<1> God, I'm lame.
<0> hehe
<7> he aint no dog
<7> though i wouldnt know.
<5> Sagoro: but still... even no colouring in vim? that's something I actually like
<0> My font is black on a translucent background
<0> not difficult to see
<1> Sagoro: Coloring gives many helpful clues for syntax and organization.
<5> yuck, unworkable
<8> syntax coloring for perl in vim roolz
<1> Ka-bar: Yep. I especially like how well it handles multi-line strings.
<0> Coma: Yeah, 100% transparency ****s
<8> especially syntax coloring for mason. really helps you make sure your blocks are closed and prevent stoopid errors
<5> Sagoro: especially on osx, which does real transparency, instead of copying the background
<9> Lies. Xorg does clever stuff for transparency too doth it not?
<5> oh, finally?
<9> Frickin Mac Elitist troll.
<5> is that your jealousy acting up again?
<9> Where's that Mac Elitist bookmark I like to trot out on these occasions?...
<5> U R SO ****
<9> http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2002/07/12
<9> That's the one.
<9> Always brings a smile to my face. :)
<10> Coma: Xorg has the XComposite extension which (among others) can do translucency.
<10> ... Now we just need to get people to use xcomp :)
<5> Tron: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/01/11
<9> Coma: Heheheh yeah i remember that one too :)
<5> but just the name of the damn thing.... I don't think I'd ever buy something named "macbook pro"
<9> Coma: The "pro" in there stands for "whore".
<9> Is that what they're going to be called? Heheheh.
<9> Shadur: Doesn't KDE 3.5 use xcomp?
<5> I mean, powerbook had a nice ring to it, but macbook pro... *puke*
<9> Perhaps it's that Superkaramba I read about recently.
<5> Lion-O: you forgot the beer again
<9> Coma: I still won't ever forget the collective global WALING which proceeded the news of Apple moving to Intel. :)
<11> right, groceries are in, financials have been done... time for more programming
<9> WAILING even.
<12> Coma: esp. considering that for years things were called FooMac and FooBook for the desktop and laptop respectively, and now they've mixed the two
<5> Tron: I couldn't care less really, as long as it works
<9> Coma: Thing is, now I'll be able to directly compare the pricing of Apple Intel-based notebooks to, well, other Intel-based notebooks.
<11> you are all .... hmm, yeah, Linux using entities?
<5> mod: I don't even dare to guess what the ibook will be renamed to
<9> Lion-O: We are all figments of your imagination. *mysterious look*
<11> good, good
<13> winbook
<9> Coma: IntelBook[tm]
<5> lol
<12> Coma: playschool book
<0> Revenger!
<11> /quote System.exit(1);
<11> oops
<0> heh, IntelBook
<9> [tm]
<5> Tron: still, for me there's a little more to consider. I want a normally working laptop with something unixy on it which just works
<9> Coma: You need : 1) A nice Desktop Replacement lappy, and 2) Linux , preferably Debian :P
<0> and doesn't whore colors
<5> and sure, linux works on laptops, but there's always this or that that doesn't work, or only half, or half not
<0> like in ls and vim ;)
<9> Actually, the iBook will be called the Intel WhoreBook.
<9> [tm]
<5> this powerbook just works, leaving me with more time to get some actual work done *whistle*
<0> c'mon
<0> you don't work
<9> Did Steve Jobs actually try to say that the new intel based notebooks will be 2.5 times faster than the G5 based ones?
<5> do too!
<14> Tron: no
<0> riiight
<14> he said that "the processor is"
<9> Oh, the processor is.
<14> or something of the sort
<5> Sagoro: in between coffeebreaks, I do stuff!
<14> of course the media mess it up
<9> K_F: Wasn't he sneakilly trying to imply that the rest of the machine would be, though?
<0> Coma: Like IRC?
<14> apparently he made a big not of it not being real-life testing as well
<14> note*
<5> Sagoro: no, that's "constant line monitoring"
<9> K_F: Sounds like you are defending him. :)
<15> hi, please im noob in linux... G++4.0 is installed (with Aynaptic Package Manager -- Ubuntu) but how do we run it now?
<9> Oh dear.
<14> I wasn't there, and I don't have a mac myself, but I know that the media obfuscate much
<0> Coma: ahh, I see...I stand, errr...sit corrected
<5> Tron: actually, he claims that the mcbook pro is 4 times faster than its g4 predecessor, and the intel imac's 2 times faster than its g5 based brother
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
spydgirl
#linux
#london
bla frenza
#javascript
fllorian28
lumpas passwords
how long does it take to change brake pads
#linuxhelp
andi alla
|
|