| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Comments:
<0> and f/w 2.03 ver
<0> let me check it out
<1> As I just stated, there's a native driver for it
<1> Googling for DWL-g122 linux would have told you that...
<2> reality: but that requires thought, and means.
<1> Yet would have taken less time than connecting to the undernet, joining this channel, and asking...
<2> reality: and this you are presented with proof of a Darwin anti evolution
<0> I googled and probably have missed info for the native driver
<2> s/this/thus/
<1> joeey: You didn't google
<1> joeey: Unless you added some **** like "DWL-g122 Linux Hot Gay g0at pr0n"
<0> I installed and configured ndiswrapper which I found on google
<0> someone found important bit of info and feels cocky now;)
<1> joeey: This someone pointed you to a native driver for your damn chipset.
<3> reality: I think you meant 'damned chipset'
<2> Steakk: no it's not Sunday, and it's his, so it has not damned you, so nor him.
<4> We still have an IRC stat page up?
<4> nervermind!
<3> gag
<3> err
<3> hah
<4> rhowe
<3> JackStorm: ${that other chan} ?
<2> XyZzY: bah, you young whippersnapper
<3> what one would that be?
<5> JackStorm: don't think so
<2> XyZzY: let me tell you about the time I had to install linux on 180K floppys, with no shoes and it was uphill there and back.
<5> you had floppies? we had to use our teeth to punch holes in cardboard
<2> XyZzY: you still had teeth then?
<2> your a baby
<6> bah, all we had was two rocks to bang togetyer
<5> you had rocks? bah all we had was Ether and let be tell you it was dang hard to do the first bigbang
<7> XyZzY: yeah yeah we know you just fed HH and dogbert2 beans until they both exploded
<2> XyZzY: ether? wtf? your from this dimension? I'm from the first quantum flux of the improbability of probability of thought
<5> JackStor<9> Hello
<8> yoyo me is back
<9> Does anybody uses Dansguardian ?
<10> wlfshmn: At least one of this channel is married to an Asian (or Oriental to be more precise) ;)
<11> wlfshmn: she is half my age, yes
<12> huh ?
<10> DaveHowe: I hope you're not 20 ;)
<9> Ehhh, anybody wondering about dansguardian ?
<11> Tron: nope. although she isn't either quite yet :)
<13> DaveHowe: why would you need the \ after [a-zA-Z]{2}? :P
<13> Viking667: ^^
<14> Jostein: actually, DaveHowe and I have found it matches ANY two letters...
<10> DaveHowe: A small but stillunignorable part of me is saying " *envy* " right now ;)
<13> I'll try to -read- before I type. gah
<14> i.e. it also matches vm or zh
<11> Jostein: because for some reason, [a-z]/{2} works (for carefully chosen values of works) and [a-z]{2} doesn't
<14> not what either of us wanted. Nor what DontDo was asking for.
<11> I think this is going to need a backreference
<14> DaveHowe: huh?why?
<13> you guys are finally done doing regexp, and talk about girls, and here I come to bitch about regexp again :P
<14> I thought you could only use backreferences in substitutions?
<13> shame on me
<11> Viking667: can't think of any other way to do it
<14> hrm.
<11> so set the backreference with (.) then follow it immediately with the backreference (/1)
<11> well, /1 - you know what I mean
<9> Maybe $1 ?
<14> uh? Explain that again, in long form? With an example?
<11> bah. "illegal back reference"
<14> yeah.
<11> well example would be "(.)\1"
<11> "match one character, then the same character again"
<14> DaveHowe: erm, for what range?
<14> like this: [a-z]\(.)\1 <---- gives illegal back reference
<11> I know.
<15> Viking667: any reason you only escape a single of the parenthases?
<11> ([a-z])\1 should have matched. I obviosly need to think a little more
<14> gimme mo. You guys have me intrigued now
<16> What are you guys matching for, and where? (sed? perl?)
<10> Regular expressions are teh ****.
<10> There should be a nicer way of expressing them ;)
<16> Regexp is fun! :D
<11> Demonen: for any character repeating itself, in vi
<14> Demonen: we're trying to... what he just said
<14> well, any alpha, just to reduce the range
<15> Tron: they look the way they do so we can look arcane in front of our users ;)
<14> lol.
<16> [a-z]{2,}?
<14> need the ?
<14> ?
<16> Yeah
<11> Demonen: got there already. that also matches "xv" because both x and v match [a-z]
<16> that matches for two or more.
<16> aaah, riiight...
<16> bummer.
<14> matches the word "site" too
<16> matches any two letters
<16> :)
<14> I tried [a-z]\{2,}
<14> with a ? after it
<11> Viking667: isnt' that functionally equivlient to just [a-z]\{2}
<11> (that's a question, but I can't put a question mark on it :)
<17> lol
<14> I thought so too, but there's apparently a diff.
<14> DontDo: you've given us a right headscratcher here, dude. I'll probably go to sleep with this now.
<16> lol
<11> Viking667: that pattern doesn't match anything
<17> ha ha ha
<18> $_[0] =~ s/\/[^\/]*\/\.\.//;
<9> egrep '([a-z]{1})\1' works well
<14> We're after stuff for the inside of vi(m)
<9> Ok, but I'm wondering about DansGuardian :)
<9> Is anybody ... using it
<11> yey - got it
<11> vi requires you to escape the brackets
<11> should have tried that FIRST dammit!
<19> Justjust_ I used only for testing, it's a firewall with DMZ, lan etc... but it's not was I think to be a good firewall.
<11> so "\(.\)\1"
<9> Aaaaa
<9> So vi interprets reg expression as string
<14> I *DID* escape the bcacrkets - still got illegal backref
<11> Viking667: that pattern I just posted - \(.\)\1 - works perfectly in my vim, matches $$, AA and oo
<14> actually, sorry. That doesn't work, but not illegal
<9> maybe then \\1 ?
<14> no no no. Yours works, but there's no range.
<14> i.e. it matches ANY pairs of characters. What about how would you limit that to a range of chars
<14> i.e. you want to find only alpha pairs?
<14> rather than tabs, spaces, or ALL pairs?
<11> Viking667: then \([a-z]\)\1
<11> I ***ume it works with character cl***es - but give me a sec to check
<9> Heh, wondering how it will work with russian alphabet
<9> ... it won't work
<14> \([a-z]\)\1
<14> yup.
<14> this is lowerascii only, I think.
<9> Aha
<14> Justjust_: huh? How come not work?
<11> yeah.
<11> Viking: ok, how about "\([^:blank:]\)\1"
<11> that matches any pair of non-blank characters
<9> I mean it works, but only with latin alphabete. As well as regex do not understand letter ranges of another alphabets
<14> DaveHowe: mrmm. It'd work for all non-whitespace.
<11> Viking667: exactly. isn't that what you want?
<14> DontDo: so, did you see what we used, finally?
<14> DaveHowe: well, the spec was for xx zz etc. So I thought the range was only alpha
<11> Viking667: basically, we now have it down to \([<your characters>]\)\1" - which is enough for someone to work with
<14> yup yup.
<17> cool.. thanks guys
<14> DontDo: next time, go do your own homework... lol.
<17> ha ha ha... not homework though
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#php
#linuxhelp
perverts.nl
#linuxhelp
#AllNiteCafe
P4P800 irqpoll
#linux
#linux
#linux
#linux
|
|