| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Comments:
<0> I hate tar and ftp, seems kinda pointless with tools like rsync
<1> xs4me: We don't know
<2> xs4me: we're not going to share this information.
<3> dunno, it is possible but less probabil
<1> xs4me: go to #linuxhelp
<4> xs4me, get a newer distro and you might not have a problem
<2> xs4me: Internet has enough spam as it is.
<5> xs4me: Why would we help you put yet another comprimisable box on the internet for peopel to root and use in their botnet, which many of us have jobs to prevent that from happening?
<3> linuxhelp is dead
<1> USE A DISTOR THAT's NOT SO OLD AND BRAINDEAD
<5> xs4me: This isn't a help channel. And if it were, we'd give you the same advice: upgrade.
<1> s/OR/RO/
<3> ihm
<3> i'm online dince rht 5.2
<1> So?
<3> and when 6.0 came out everyone was so excited
<1> Use something a bit more modern
<5> xs4me: And you've probably been running other people's bot nets for that long too.
<3> so cool, so brand new, sa full of features
<3> and now 7.3 is so old and buggy
<3> you guys really ****
<6> finaly
<1> heh
<1> We really ****
<6> I don't understand why some people just don't get it...
<5> ksh: Man. We ****.
<2> Besides; everyone who actually KNEW RH really knew better than to use 6.0. It was just like Windows; you'd only move when 6.1+ came out.
<5> heh
<6> I have a guy like this at work.. you tell him "Don't do it like this do it like that"... he says "Ok I need to do it like that right".... and then goes and does it the wrong way still.... heh
<5> Zoffix: That's 80% of the non-regulars that come here
<5> And did you know that 86.3% of all statistics are made up on the spot?
<6> hehe
<1> and Falchion is usually only 12% correct
<7> using about 2.5% of his brain capacity
<8> Falchion: heh.
<9> so does the trap ALRM echo "alarm clock"?
<9> because thats what I get
<9> even though i have different commands after the trap
<4> Ariya try pasting your code http://rafb.net/paste/
<10> anyone alive in here...
<2> nope
<1> nope
<11> i died a long time ago
<11> the miasma in my soul bleeds pain into the river of death
<11> (or some other vaguely goth ****)
<10> s/needs/wants/
<11> samsung 213T.
<10> I asked...not in stock...some nice viewsonics are, however...
<11> order one from dell then. the dell flatpanels are actually really good
<10> http://shop4.outpost.com/%7BeZLbH+AY+6-0wBwbYi4KSA**.node1%7D/search?search_type=regular&sqxts=1&query_string=Monitors&cat=0&submit.x=0&submit.y=0
<10> bhab...don't want to wait :)
<11> ah, instant gratification :)
<10> that's the URL i'm looking at
<10> bhab, for as much as I won today, I can afford it
<11> if you don't mind me asking, how much is that? (obviously over $900 if you were looking at the 213T :D)
<10> was looking at the first entry
<10> $229 ($189 after rebate)...just need a monitor, not a monitor/TV combo :)
<1> get dual LCD flat panels
<10> ksh...NO space :)
<1> make space
<1> I setup dual head at work and don't know ho wI ever got along without dual head
<11> oh, the 213T is monitor-only
<11> ksh: i agree, i don't know how i ever got along without it either
<10> what, buy a new desk (I could afford it)...I have a philips 17" CRT at the moment...it's a desk hog
<0> I used to love my nice and simple philips 170 LCD
<10> however, I don't know if I want to spend $70 extra to get 1.1 more inches of space
<1> With most monitors, you can replace them with dual head LCD without much distraction
<10> 1.1 inches of space (19 vs 20.1)
<1> dual head is the way to go
<10> ksh, I only have single head on my current system
<1> dogbert2: and you'll enjoy dual head that much more
<11> dogbert2: samsung 205BW.
<10> ksh...however, I can start with one LCD, and always move to dual :)
<1> If I had the money, I would find a way to replace my 17" monitor with dual head 19" LCD flat panles
<9> why do I get "Alarm Clock" when the trap is called?
<10> that's 300 after rebate
<10> what's the wide flat panel get me?
<11> dogbert2: the wide flat panel gets you a wacky/weird resolution, and more horizontal desktop real estate
<1> as a matter of fact, if I had the money, I would mount a 42" LCD flat panel on the wall in front of me freeing up all of my desk space...
<10> here is the description: The Samsung SyncMaster 205BW is a 20-inch Wide TFT-LCD delivering a 600:1 contrast ratio, 300 cd/m2 brightness, 1680 x 1050 resolution, 160 degree viewing angle and scanning frequency of 30-81kHz horizontal and 56-75Hz vertical. It is also HDTV Ready with DVI input with HDCP support.
<0> grrr @ hdcp
<1> 1680x1050 resolution is enticing
<11> yeah, the resolution and the contrast/brightness ratio are what I based that on.
<10> ksh...yeah, i'm at 1024x768x32 at the moment
<0> dogbert2, end-to-end encryption/piracy protection
<11> mike2: yeah, i hate it too.
<1> I really like to have lots o' screen real estate
<11> mike2: i was pissed when i tried to hook my flat panel to my DVR when my TV went out and realized that it wasn't going to work
<1> which is why I gave up my 21" screen at work for dual 19" flat panels
<1> changed video settings to an agreeable config...and gives me plenty of real estate
<0> I hate widescreen, hell, we're punished enough in terms of lack of vertical screen real-estate already.
<10> 20 inch samsung does look nice
<11> it's going to be relatively short
<11> the display will probably be between 8.5-9.5" tall
<0> grrr
<10> what, the samsung model?
<11> but probably a good 14" wide.
<11> yup.
<0> god, I mean, you already have toolbars, menubars, window frame/title, start-menu/task bar taking up real-estate, and then they decide to make the damned thing shorter still *sigh*
<10> twenty inches diagonal (if memory serves on screen measurements), right?
<11> that's correct.
<10> i'm going down to Frys...bbl
<11> mike2: yes, that's why i put that **** on the side of my screen.
<0> some of it you can't... simpler solution is to buy a 4:3 display as opposed to 16:9/16:10
<11> that's one of the reasons i went with the 213T, it's a 4:3 running at 1600x1200.
<0> much better :)
<11> one of the cool things about it, is you can run them in portrait mode, too :)
<0> all I need/want is 1280x1024 at a very low latency and decent brightness
<11> Imagine two of those side-by-side, 2400x1600. :)
<11> I'd love to get my hands on another one and do that.
<12> so obviously what one needs, instead of a 4:3 1600x1200, is a 16:9 2133x1200 ;)
<13> I still cant get over my new boot screen
<12> or maybe a 16:10 1920x1200
<0> Liandrin, no, I just don't use the width of a display, I use workspaces, I'd much prefer 1200x1600 I reckon?
<12> mike2, so rotate it 90
<14> hey you
<14> MAKE SENSE
<0> yeah, but it doesn't bother me _enough_ if I have 4:3
<14> what do you think about an Acer
<14> it is a good screen
<1> someone was in here the other day asking about running X on one screen and console on the other in a dual head setup
<11> acer is only *eh*
<1> wonder if that worked out for 'em
<14> i will buy one tomorrow
<14> 295$
<14> :p
<14> a 19::
<14> a 19''
<14> **** that
<14> 19 inchs
<14> they was at 450$ over..
<14> <11> acer is only *eh*....was it sarcastic?
<11> no
<14> ok lol
<11> meaning they're not great, but they're not terrible either
<11> and on that note
<11> i'm going home.
<14> i ill buy a next generation
<14> not an old
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#MissKitten
#mirc
#skype
bayot diay mp3
mysql forgin key
jlgaddis
karlii
the most repulsive warring creatures in The Lord of the Rings
Hot Angelia Jollie
#AllNiteCafe
|
|