| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Comments:
<0> you may actually be correct there :P
<1> Skye
<0> I usually like having a dahlwinie, talisker and oban at home
<0> currently I have none of those though
<0> Ka-bar: lol
<2> Jostein: hmm, I should probably add some whiskey to my collection, name one you'd like me to get
<0> K_F: dahlwinie
<0> K_F: very good allrounder IMP
<0> IMO
<1> *nod*
<2> I'll try to remember it next time I'm at "polet"
<2> 15 years old, nice
<0> subtle taste, but still very rich
<2> they are out on the webshop though
<1> Though Aberlour 10 is still my "standard, every day" scotch.
<0> unlike Bowmore :P
<2> Jostein: http://tinyurl.com/pl8hl
<0> hehehe
<2> they only have one fricking bottle at Storo
<1> all this talk of scotch is making me thirsty.
<0> oh. They -do- have lots in lesund though
<2> Jostein: but of course :)
<2> Jostein: we have money and enjoy the booze
<2> only 2 on Stormoa though
<2> that is where I shop usually
<3> pizdec ebanie suki
<0> eh?
<3> hi
<0> suki nai.
<3> how to change cdrom speed?
<3> in NetBSD ;-)
<0> is this #BSD or #NetBSD?
<3> hdparm/cdcontrol/atacontrol - command not found
<3> Jostein: yeah, #NetBSD sleeping.. ;/
<4> hmm
<3> why?
<5> Kvazimodo: I see you really have a very low iq
<5> Kvazimodo: 1) This is #linux, not #bsd. 2) How about actually READING a manual sometime?
<3> not low ;P
<5> not low, none existing then. Sorry, my mistake.
<6> version strings ****!!!
<3> ****ing ****
<6> at least windows does something decent to help comparing versions
<3> pidor
<3> gay
<3> !!
<3> (___Y___)c=================8
<3> bitch
<4> hey Lion-O
<4> #twits perhaps?
<5> oy Nanuq
<7> what would make someone join a channel just to be a tool like Kvazimodo? was it how they were raised or what?
<5> Syrus: rotard.
<5> 'nough said.
<2> heya Lion-O
<5> Eya K_F
<2> there we go
<2> aaah
<4> K_F
<2> heya
<0> work tomorrow can **** it :P
<2> Jostein: hehe
<5> time for sleep();
<1> Damn.
<1> I missed BOFHBall Happy Hour. ;(
<0> heh
<8> w00t
<2> hehe
<1> jgaddis: w00t?
<8> Ka-bar: yeah, w00t.
<4> Jeremy!
<1> Jostein: had a whisky with dinner at my apt. then I found a nice 750ml bottle of belgian ale with a 10.5% ABV and brought that back to the office.
<2> Pitchou: either stay or go away, preferably the latter, but at least decide on one thing
<8> hey eric
<0> Ka-bar: heck. thats a nice dinner
<1> It's really kind of cool.. the setup I've got down here. Don't need phone/cable/internet at my apt. since it's just across the street from the office which has everything.
<1> and I'm down here to *work* mon-fri, so I spend most of my time at the office anyway. The apartment is nothing more than a place to sleep. And I go "home" on the weekend.
<0> cool
<8> Ka-bar: i'm looking at a place which is "within wifi range" of $work =)
<8> $25/mo. for 3 mbps or $0/mo. for 90 mbps? =)
<1> It was cheaper for me to rent an apartment than to stay in a motel 4 nights a week.
<0> I know I can level that without bugging anyone
<1> actually, when I do get around to getting a new notebook, my apartment is within wi-fi distance of the office. and we already have an external antenna in the lab pointing over at my apt. :)
<8> Ka-bar: heh, i'm about to purchase all new equipment to upgrade our wireless. if i get this place, you can believe there'll be an external antenna on top of the building pointing right at me =)
<1> nice.
<1> the antenna we got goes right outside the lab window, from which you can see my apt.
<1> and the office might be getting fiber soon. w00t!
<9> We just got fiber into our new building
<9> However, the wireless lan is limited to 52 kBps per client
<8> 52 kbps!?
<1> 52 K ?
<8> geez, that's not much better than dialup
<9> Yeah
<1> HFS.
<9> KBps
<0> thats worse than my GPRS
<1> so, they brought in a T-1, over-subscribed the **** out of it and then had to throttle it to keep it from dying....
<10> haha
<0> jgaddis: its ActiveX. It will break
<0> gah
<11> err
<0> ksh: eh
<9> Ka-bar: No, they have the bandwidth...they just don't think we need it
<10> instead of static limiting of the bandwidth, it should be dynamic, dividing bandwidth to each client evenly as needed
<0> ksh: I was about to ask for a temp @ for that :P
<1> safemode: really
<11> Jostein: 'sok, I took care of it
<10> static limiting is lazy network adminning
<12> ksh: +++, just finished first draft of mine
<1> in fact, you could probably do dynamic traffic shaping in linux embedded in your linksys router.
<0> ksh: Ih well. I just felt like doing it myself
<10> I did my taxes in february
<0> ksh: that bastrad has been pissing me off for some time :P
<10> got my refund before march started
<11> Jostein: Well, now you can be happy in the fact that I did it :)
<0> hehehehe
<11> whitecap: I hate taxes
<1> ksh: so stop paying them
<8> Ka-bar: i think he probably hates jail more
<12> ksh: aye
<11> ka-bar: I'd rather not feel the wrath of IRS tax attornies
<12> jgaddis: 0.000054% of the MS budget
<12> jgaddis: do you really think most users update regularily ?
<8> whitecap: no idea, but it has to pretty much be at its highest ever nowadays
<1> whitecap: most home users running XP probably do, since autoupdate is enabled by default.
<8> most corporate users probably do as well, unless $admin is just plain ****in' stupid
<1> or they're using SMS and just force the upgrades on all the desktops every night.
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#javascript
#windows
#chatzone
#AllNiteCafe
#london
#networking
pok3_m0n
chatzone peru
#windows
#chatzone
|
|