| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Comments:
<0> UGH
<1> smsie: HOLY **** your kidding me
<0> i should NOT ****ing need scratch paper for this kind of thing. :D
<2> schitzo: I never kid
<2> they don't get hard until 27
<3> 27 was ****ing evil
<2> 27, 28 and 29 are "difficult"
<2> 28 and 29 are just ****ing SILLY
<3> The ones before it was basically tricky
<4> What the hell...
<4> OK 18/19 is pissing me off. lol
<3> Resonator: That one was a tricky one :)
<2> took me 15 seconds :)
<3> For me at least. Goes to show I tend to get stuck in a line of thinking.
<3> I look for clues instead of looking for causes
<0> holy ****. typos on 16 are going to drive me out of my mind
<5> anyway care to /msg me another clue for 7?
<5> anyone
<2> what was 7?
<5> "sept"
<0> i just msged you a clue
<2> ah
<5> thanks thanks thanks all
<5> figured so. didnt help me much though.
<3> Jostein: Tsk
<3> I'll do 28, 29 and 30 tomorrow, I have a headache
<2> schitzo: I never kid
<0> okay. i know what 15 is supposed to be
<0> i do
<6> Someone said my name, but I can't find the reference...
<0> someone just cut and paste what they used on the url so i dont have to type it
<0> because i'm going nuts
<7> d-side: which?
<6> Sorry to whomever I missed, a co-worker's having weird issues with Office 2003.
<6> D-side: Did you get the answer to 14? I'm stuck on it too.
<0> yeah i did.
<0> geewrd: 15/16
<6> Can you give me a hint? :)
<2> for what?
<6> For 14
<7> resonator gave me one
<2> he thinks I recall which 14 is?
<7> but it's not helping
<0> SOS! SOS!
<6> "13, unlucky..." <--- I've tried many variations of "14" and "lucky", no luck
<0> dont worry. that one is total bull****
<2> CeruleanD: complete the phrase
<7> what ****ing phrase?
<0> 16/17 makes me want to cry
<6> I tried that too...
<0> is this is a goddamn anagram i'm going to lose my mind.
<3> D-side: Fun, eh? Wait til you see 17 :)
<8> argh
<3> It'll make you want to tair your hair out
<8> madness
<8> 20's kicking my *** hard.
<0> i'm looking at this 16/17
<0> and i swear to god i ordered that at an indian restaurant once
<8> D-side: what's it say?
<1> D-side: Google helped me
<0> eep opp ork ah ah
<6> geeez, that one's lame (14). Thanks D-side, smsie
<3> siglite: Take a long hard look at the source of the page
<9> 21 is seemingly easy, but the answer I came to (which made sense) didn't work :|
<2> what was 21?
<9> orziot_jiz
<2> ah
<2> yeah, that was irritating
<2> but not actually *hard*
<3> Oh yeah
<8> arg
<8> I got 20
<3> just need to go at it from the right angle
<10> !op
<3> Awe
<3> /z skyeagles !oops
<9> hmm right angle hmm
<9> I have it pegged as a 5 char shift, but the _XXX part doesn't compute...
<9> or rather, 404s ;)
<2> Flimflam: no, it's not a 5 char shift
<9> balls
<1> is the 1597 a math one?
<2> depending which direction you look
<0> i **** at all the ones with digits.
<3> Flimflam: It's what threw me off at first too
<0> schitzo: i'm pretty sure you should bereferring to that as 17/18 :)
<1> ok is 17/18 a math one?
<2> Flimflam: *decoding* is 5...
<9> schitzo: yes, it's math related
<2> schitzo: yes
<9> smsie: hmm, hmm *nod*
<1> crap I hate math
<5> if 13 is based on some kind of phrase, apart from the obvious one, I havent heard it :P
<5> er ... 12
<1> Jostein: you and a lot of other people
<0> i **** at math.
<1> so 17/18 isn't a year
<3> schitzo: no, it's not
<2> schitzo: no, it's not a year
<3> It's a ****ing evil one if you're not a math buff
<0> haha
<7> what the hell
<0> i just had a tbought
<1> PolarWolf: that would be me
<0> thought.
<3> Aware of all the "great" mathematical theorists who come with all kinds of weird number sequences
<1> PolarWolf: do they also brew beer?
<2> it's a fairly central series
<0> the first google hit i got for 16/17... i wonder if the people who run that page are looking at the hit stats and thinking "what the ****"
<3> schitzo: Doubt it
<3> D-side: Hehe
<1> PolarWolf: yeah, then I probably don't know them.
<0> i **** at teh math
<2> most programmers will have written code to generate the series
<7> HOW IN THE **** WAS I SUPPOSED TO FIGURE OUT 14
<7> that was evil
<3> smsie: Question is; *why*?
<7> pure luck
<2> PolarWolf: for the same reason you have to write a function for factorial
<2> it's educative :)
<3> smsie: So is math itself, they say
<2> indeed
<9> how do you arrive at the encoding shift number, does it have a relationship with any of the other numbers?
<0> OH GOD DAMN YOU
<9> 5 and 21 don't seem to match up for me so I'm drawing blanks
<0> yeah **** me you long since dead mathmatician ****face
<0> i read that stupid book and i hope dan brown goes to hell
<2> Flimflam: what is the number supposed to represent?
<9> smsie: well, 21 is the page number and 5 is the shift
<2> 5 is NOT the shift
<3> Flimflam: Yeah, but where are you trying to go to?
<2> 5 is the *decoding* shift
<2> what's the *encoding* shift?
<9> OK, my mistake in wording
<11> 14 wasn't obvious on sight?
<5> oh. right
<5> that was actually simple
<9> well, I guessed at 6 being that 22 is one above 21, thinking the same logic
<9> that didn't work, however
<2> 5 is NOT the encoding shift
<2> what is the encoding shift?
<5> is 15 -morse-?
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#mirc
#php
#MissKitten
#java
gnomebaker lightscribe
#AllNiteCafe
lumpas passwords
#javascript
#linux
paagles
|
|