| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Comments:
<0> bah. can't kick in here :(
<1> smsie: well, writing exploits in helping fix security holes and bugs.
<1> Exploits for educational purposes...
<2> fruitbag: no
<3> fruitbag: Go away.
<4> smsie: Boot floppy, it connects to network, prompts for credentials, enter them, it maps $share to Z:, CD's to Z: and runs the ghost client.
<1> smsie: exploits are great help in helping fix bugs and holes.
<0> older versions of ghost would fit on a single bootable floppy. newer ones are a little bigger, but not much
<4> smsie: s/floppy/via PXE/ as well
<2> fruitbag: not in here
<2> fruitbag: cease this line of enquiry now please
<1> smsie: as you wish.
<0> I tend(ed) to use a pxe boot floppy (image) based on the modular network boot floppy
<0> also by bart :)
<5> can hide the "login:" prompt? Is that the PAM?
<3> SpoppO: if you dont know how PAM works, dont use it.
<3> SpoppO: and no, you cant.
<2> what do you mean by "hide the login: prompt" exactly?
<5> well, pam comes with most of the distros... by "hide" i mean not disable, but just HIDE. make the server not display the "login:" but still listen for user input.
<3> ...
<3> What are you looking for? a Kiosk mode or something?
<2> SpoppO: it's not pam, no
<2> that part is handled by login
<2> actually, probably by getty
<2> check the source to make sure
<5> i see. thank you smsie, syn-ack
<2> ah, yeah, according to the manpage, that's getty
<3> I think its both.... getty does the inital input and then hands it to login to verify credentials and such
<6> anyone noticing DNS issues today?
<0> nope
<3> K_F: Im on public Wifi - I always have DNS issues. :p
<6> I notice a slowdown on .net anyways
<2> syn-ack: yeah. I *think* he wanted to change the actual text displayed...getty displays the "login: " string. I might have misunderstood what he was loking for though
<3> smsie: **** he could have just made an /etc/motd or something for that then.
<3> if thats what he wanted to do that is. :p
<3> wouldnt have gotten rid of the "login" but oh well.
<3> I need to get me a digital Camera.
<0> got one. they are overrated
<0> most people's phones seem to have a one these days
<3> DaveHowe: Not for what I do. I would like to take pics of the some the places I see
<0> both becky's phones seem to, come to think of it
<3> Dave: mines got one, but its like not even 1 Mpix or something
<3> DaveHowe: I want to get an SLR
<0> syn-ack: thats serious photography. that said, I was reading an article from a pro the other day that said some of the $150 cameras were pretty much as good as the $4000 digital slrs
<0> http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm
<3> DaveHowe: I havent decided but I think I want a 35 mm SLR and then I'll get a basic digital cam
<3> Im still one of the few who would rather have **** on film and not on disc. heh
<3> Viking667: I want it more for the changing of filters not as much for lenses, per se....
<7> Most of the digital cameras he's seen for < 600 are fixed lens...
<0> syn-ack: you got an existing slr you could add a digital back to?
<3> Not at the moment..... Hell I didnt know you could do that...
<7> DaveHowe: doesn't that rather depend upon the manufacturer and model whether you CAN do that?
<0> Viking667: yup, although there are 3rd party suppliers for most of the popular models of slr; but that's covered in "do you have one you could add a digital back to" surely?
<3> DaveHowe: Im looking at getting either a Nikon or Cannon.
<7> It's one of those things I'll do "when I have enough money"...
<3> The Nikon I want they dont make anymore though.... its got a removable prism
<0> Viking667: always did the darkroom side of things, plus a bit of techie - light meters, soft bounce, lens adaptors, that sort of thing
<0> I don't do the pointing and shooting, and hell if I am doing the buying and weeping ;)
<0> but read that link I posted a little earlier - its by a pro photographer, and discusses why expensive digicams aren't usually worth the money (and of course the usual ***ertion that if a non-pro ****s with a $150 cam, he will still **** if you give him a $4K one :)
<0> http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/150-vs-5000-dollar-camera.htm <-- more direct link to the latter bit
<0> I think the first image on that one is an argument against though - the 4K cam picture is clearly more detailed, handles depth of field better, and looks less distorted
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#windows
#php
bellbian
#c
php image impius
Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_access.so into server+fedora core 5
#chatzone
#chatzone
usb does not have any corresponding BIOS drive
#slice
|
|