| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Comments:
<0> there are RPM files in the directory with the name of the software
<1> cadett: an RMP can contain either sources or binaries or both.
<1> er, RPM
<0> hm
<2> LOL
<1> but in your case I suspect it's probably only binaries.
<0> let me check the files on the computer not on the cd then
<2> send the files this way
<2> i'll check if they're binaries
<1> What is the application? Who originally developed it? If they did, indeed, go out of business, would it be possible to track somebody down who has the source code so that you could hire somebody to port it for you?
<0> hmm
<0> not possible at the moment
<2> ??
<2> brb
<3> hahahah
<3> Thank you for the possibility to ask questions
<3> about your service over email. Can you send me an example of an
<3> txt record to see how I have
<3> to structure this?
<4> heh.. dumb***
<5> hehehe
<0> thanks and goodbye for now..
<6> This is the most interesting thing you will read today: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaped-charge
<7> naah
<8> already aware.
<7> TenBaseT: if it is on wikipedia its old news ;)
<6> not in the detail in that article.
<6> it's pretty thorough.
<3> TenBaseT: Once you play with explosives as part of your job, it's not nearly as interesting :)
<5> yeah...when you learn how to make KABOOM, it's not as much fun...
<6> I'd like to make a SFP
<8> ugh i'm eating soup like a stroke patient
<5> TBT, careful you don't BLOW yourself up :)
<9> I'm surprised the "terrists" haven't yet used modified model rockets. You can do some ****ed up things with those, potentially.
<6> They're still low-order, theydeflagrate, they dont detonate
<8> eh, the stuff you need to get them going a great distance are all controlled
<5> Tron, heh...that's kinda old...I was using model rockets as weapons in my youth
<6> Doesnt matter, it's still a low-order mixture. it's not very useful as a large explosive
<8> and FAA licenses for model rocketry are becoming harder to get.
<5> D-side, you can make your own propellant...
<9> dogbert2: *nod* Indeed.
<3> Why bother with model rockets when a backpack can do more damage?
<8> dogbert2: again, all controlled substances
<8> and Falchion does make a great point.
<9> TenBaseT: Forget model rovketry then - amateur rocketry is on a whole different order of magnitude.
<5> heh...rocket candy propellant isn't controlled and can launch a rocket a LONG way
<6> Tron: still the same solid propellant, just on a larger scale
<9> TenBaseT: I beg to differ.
<3> ****, a shaped charged and a can of gas can be fun for imploding a building. heh
<5> <--- has used Type F and G rated engined
<6> Look, I dont care what you make a model rocket motor out of, it STILL burns,it doesnt detonate
<6> if it detonated it would be unsuitable.
<5> TBT...would it surprise you that I improvised the nose cone to be a contact weapon :)
<9> TenBaseT: Model rocketry normally uses black powder as a propellent. WHen you go higher up in scale, the bigger rocket motors use ammonium perchlorate. My group makes our own hybrid rocket engines.
<6> dogbert2: not at all
<6> Tron: you can take all the perchlorate you want, it's still a low explosive.
<6> Tron: and it still doesnt detonate under normal circumstances
<9> TenBaseT: And I'm not talking about explodng the engines. You wouldn't touch those, you would have $explosey_stuff_ as the ****ing /payload/
<6> oh, that.
<9> Bingo.
<6> well, you'd just be building Katushas at that point
<6> or RPG's if you wanted to directly aim them
<3> What kind of payload do you think you're going to get with a model rocket?
<5> TBT, when the plant blew up here in Henderson back in 1990, the resulting explosion caused about 250 million dollars in damage in the las vegas valley (the shock wave from the blast 8 miles from my house blew in the garage door and knocked the front door off it's hinges)
<6> the magic is in the guindance
<9> TenBaseT: No, the capability to make a self-correcting rocket is already there.
<5> and that was ammonium percholate (solid rocket fuel)
<6> dogbert2: I saw the tape, that was amazing. That, however, was not the "normal circumstances" for perchlorate
<3> ****, it's much easier to make a mortar that is more accurate and effective and can carry a larger payload.
<9> TenBaseT: ****, one of my mates has made a circuit which can make a rocket with a long-burn motor _hover_ for at least 15 seconds.
<5> no, but it shows what having a ****load of it can do (makes for a very bad day)...the fact that only 2 people were killed was amazing
<6> dogbert2: only TWO people died in that?
<5> C12H22O11 + KNO3 == rocket fuel
<9> TenBaseT: His circuit gimball's the rocket motor.
<5> ayup...only two people
<6> Tron: whats its payload?
<8> pot***ium nitrate?
<9> TenBaseT: THe payload is the electronics necessary to gimball the rocket engine.
<3> Hell, if you want to talk about shear effectiveness, I'd rather just fill 10 backpacks with Kaboom stuff and chunks of metal and just time them all to go off at the same time. Screw rockets.
<5> KNO3 is pot***ium nitrate
<8> i'm amazed i knew that
<5> Falchion, you still hafta LUG the backpacks by yourself
<10> dogbert2: or pay FedEx to do it ;)
<6> Tron: thats not very useful as a weapon then ;)
<5> hehehe
<9> TenBaseT: My point being that there are people out there with the capability of turning an amateur rocket into something a lot less innocent.
<5> Tron, i'm ONE of those people :)
<6> Oh, sure there are. I wouldnt doubt that, but there's a lot of smart people out there that could probably do a whole lot worse a whole lot easier than using a rocket for it.
<9> dogbert2: *nod* I wnet with my mates to the USA one year, to Black Rock desert to launch our hybrid rocket.
<5> TBT... a screaming eagle (one of my first rockets from estes) had a range of about 1200ft and cost all of $6-8 back in 1977
<10> Tron: TOday would be a bad day to opt for an amateur rocket launch, right? ;)
<3> dogbertYou drive around, park, stash, drive. Not hard. And it's 100% accurate,unlike a rocket ;)
<5> Falchion, true...
<8> Tron: whos your mate, john carmack? :D
<9> wlfshmn: A very, VERY bad day ;)
<9> dogbert2: One of our bits of kit : http://www.mars.org.uk/history/b4.php
<10> dogbert2: we've emulated anti-tank weaponry using fireworks, foam pads and PVC-tubing during airsoft games before ;)
<3> In fact, backpacks would be a better choice if your goal was to strike fear in the hearts of the populace.
<5> hehehe...wlfshmn...I made a primative RPG as a kid :)
<10> dogbert2: it's supprisingly accurate...
<5> tube launched, lightweight medal body, spring loaded fins...mucho fun!
<10> Falchion: m72?
<5> <--- put some rather large sized holes in some houses under construction back then :)
<6> we used a law tube when I Was a kid to launch bottle rockets and model rockets
<3> wlfshmn: I'd have to look. It was one of our training ones that I snagged one day from my old unit. heh
<10> m190 then probably
<9> TenBaseT: law tube? w***at then?
<3> Then again, when you talk about anti-armor weapons, I was a TOW and MK-19 gunner. heh
<6> we'd build model rockets and launch them horizontally
<5> TBT...that's always fun...
<3> Tron: LAW rocket launcher. Light Anti-Armor Weapon.
<6> Tron: the disposable spent tube from an anti-tank weapon
<9> TenBaseT: Breaking of the Big Great RUles of rocketry - thou shalt not lauch a rocket horizontally ;)
<6> Tron: once the missile is fired the tube is just a neat looking piece of garbage
<3> TenBaseT: Yep.
<9> "The pointy end goes up towards the sky"
<5> Tron...I've launched rockets at a 30 degree angle :)
<8> Tron: yeah yeah
<8> so they say
<8> i blew a hole in a little league backstop once
<6> Tron: yeah, I used to break the other rule "do not pack the chute area of a D-cl*** rocket with 6oz of smokeless powder"
<8> "accidentally"
<9> TenBaseT: Hahahaha!
<5> bwhahahaha:
<5> A desperate motorist tried to escape a speeding fine by blowing up the roadside camera which snapped him, a court heard on Wednesday.
<3> Link?
<11> how can i add my FAT partitions while running on a terminal?
<5> sounds like my kind of guy :)
<5> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=399844&in_page_id=1770
<5> he used thermite to destroy the camera (muhahahaha)
<6> hahahahah thats awesome
<7> NukeGuy: 'man mount'. you'll have to mount those.
<6> slagging a camera
<12> hahhah
<12> nice
<12> thermite
<5> bwhahaha...the guy should be given a medal for his genius :)
<11> Lion-O cant i do the same when i freshly installed my OS?
<7> NukeGuy: depends on the OS.
<6> pfft. "reacts explosively"
<11> slackware?
<9> dogbert2: THe other method people here in the UK have used extensively to destroy roadside cameras, is to place a gasoline-filled car tyre arouns the top of one, light it and run like **** out of the way.
<5> TBT...yeah, thrmite doesn't do that, it just melts **** :)
<6> It reacts 'energetically' but certainly not explosively.
<5> Tron...it's more simple to use something to obscure the plate with selective bending of light :)
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#AllNiteCafe
#linux
#c++
hopkedo
#asm
#java
#AllNiteCafe
DJ xandek
#linux
squid ping timeout
|
|