| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Comments:
<0> well what? com3 doesn't have a tty device.
<1> Lion-O: Moo
<0> even more reason why your question makes totally no sense.
<0> Tibzip: rem000
<2> Lion-O: Aren't they just Serial TTYs?
<0> Shadur: sshhhh
<1> Lion-O: Heyyas:)
<0> Yo Tibzip / Shadur / Nanuq / rhowe / wlfshmn / Tron / $others
<3> Lion-O: Greets
<3> Shadur: Greets
<2> self.greet(channel->occupants)
<1> s/->/,
<4> hello Shadur
<5> Lion-O
<6> i have a problem wiuth a hp unix sistem! can someone help?
<0> dls-128: unless it runs Linux I fail to see how.
<7> i uploaded a cgi script on the server, i can see it on ftp, on plesk also, however when i call it to loada www.mydomain.com/cgi-bin/my.cgi i get an error 404 that is not found. any ideas please?
<7> i uploaded a cgi script on the server, i can see it on ftp, on plesk also, however when i call it to load www.mydomain.com/cgi-bin/my.cgi i get an error 404 that is not found. any ideas please?
<5> Steakk!
<8> Canuk :P
<8> err, nanuk
<5> heh
<8> i ... hate ... mornings
<5> mornings are okay
<8> not when you only get like 4 hours sleep
<8> nightly
<5> pisser. why only four?
<8> past few days I have been driving 6 hours (3hrs to clients, 3 hrs back home), and working on site for 6 hours, then coming home, and taking care of things here, and going to other clients, and its just ****ing exhausting
<5> cripes
<8> i wanted to sleep in today, but NOOOO, its thursday, and all us big-wigs gotta be at the round-table meeting
<5> didn't know you wore a wig
<5> a big one at that :)
<8> heh
<5> Steakk: and here I am knockin' myself out, benchmarking openssl for ****s 'n giggles
<8> play time? you can afford play-time?
<5> I tend to have six months of playtime per year
<8> wtf is your career?
<8> or are you just that bad at holding a job? heh
<5> Steakk: Nah, it's seasonal work.
<8> ah
<5> Steakk: CRA, like your IRS.
<5> Steakk: Except friendlier.
<8> Not bad
<8> but, i hate working with numbers
<5> Steakk: Though I'm hoping to pick up something with StatsCan, in regards to the recent census
<8> never again
<5> Steakk: Well, it's more checking for errors, and outbound support ;)
<8> ahhh
<8> I am in the process of registering with usnet
<5> Steakk: pogey the rest of the year, unless I get something else
<5> Steakk: I did apply for this one position, as a "technical advisor"
<5> Steakk: pays decent
<8> To like give advice to computers?
<5> Steakk: It's actually quite daft. They know I've the skills, but they don't put me in the section they could really benefit.
<5> Steakk: Well, the electronic processing department. I did work in there last year.
<5> Steakk: But only to poek at some rogue T5 and T3 returns.
<8> Wow, my guys at link-source are on the ball...just sent me all my W9 info I requested less than 2 mins ago
<8> yes, that was severely OT
<8> heh
<5> Steakk: so which is the W9?
<8> W9 is a form that is used by the IRS for companies that are doing contracting work for another company, and are not on that companies payroll
<8> IE: Company A hires my company to do a job, and gives me a check when it is done
<8> I have to claim that, using 1099 forms at the end of the fiscal
<5> so subcontracting?
<8> Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification form required by the IRS to furnish the payer, transfer agent, broker or other middleman with an employee's social security or taxpayer identification number, in order that the employee not be subject to backup withholding because of under-reporting of interest and dividends on his or her tax return.
<8> yes, subcontracting
<5> hrm
<5> I suppose here it'd be on your personal T1
<5> though we have T1204 for government subcontractors, and T5018 for construction
<5> that latter one is relatively new.
<5> lots of construction work under the table, so they conjured up that
<5> you'd think they'd be the simplest to work, but holy **** when you run into a problem, god help you
<5> usually the people don't want to do them, and haven't accepted their existence, and they're retards to begin with. :)
<8> thats canadia for ya :P
<8> yes, i said canadia
<5> eh canuckistan
<8> anyways, i gotta go...1.5 hour drive to this round-table meeting
<9> help how can i write ntfs filesystem
<5> Steakk: enjoy
<8> oh yeah...hastas
<5> Jaboc: use Windows NT?
<9> I use FC5
<5> There's your problem.
<9> I need ntfs , for saving data more then 4 GB on Windows
<5> Right. Well, NTFS write support under Leenooks isn't worth a damn, last I checked.
<5> Reading is okay, but you can only write existing files, and you can't increase their size.
<5> So you can't append to files, or create new ones. Not very useful.
<9> that sux very much
<5> Jaboc: Maybe they've improved it, but that's last I checked.
<9> have you heard tried ntfs-3g ?
<5> Nope, what's that?
<3> Jaboc: Google for "captive-ntfs"
<9> is captive-ntfs better then 3g ?
<3> Jaboc: Captive ntfs works for me - it uses ntoskrnl.exe and *mumble* from your NT or XP installation in order to provide full read/write access to your NTFS filesystem. WOrks a treat for me.
<5> Oh well I only know what ships with vanilla
<3> Jaboc: I have no idea if it's better or not. ALl I know is that It Works For Me[tm]
<9> aha ok THanks
<5> Tron: I suppose that would work, but obviously not 100% open source :)
<9> This is another solution what i get from other channel : Jaboc: have to enable it in kernel and then rebuild
<9> rumour has it, ntfs is Microsoft's "modern" filesystem. See http://www.linux-ntfs.org/ for kernel drivers which now claims full read/write capabilties. Other options include http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/
<3> Nanuq: I'm not a "100% fully open source" zealot though :)
<9> Is it easy to rebuild the kernel ?
<3> Jaboc: Depending on your skill level, yes.
<5> Jaboc: Okay, so I've learnt something.
<9> Im beginner
<3> Jaboc: THough recompiling a kernel is not something to be taken lightly.
<3> Ah yes, s/*mumble*/ntfs.sys/ :P
<5> well I'm impressed
<5> gcc 4.1.1 gives me a consistent 30% improvement over gcc 3.4.6
<3> Nanuq: Hrm?
<5> er, for AES
<3> Nanuq: WHat do you mean by "for AES"?
<5> blowfish is only about 3%
<5> Tron: OpenSSL benchmarks
<3> Nanuq: You mean compiling openssl using the two compilers and comparing the speed at which each resultant compiled code operates?
<5> Tron: on Solaris/SPARC, yes
<3> Nanuq: I see.
<5> Tron: hmm?
<3> Nanuq: You know? "I see.", as in "Ah, okay then."
<5> md5 1191.61k 4027.71k 11709.66k 22212.27k 29426.95k
<5> md5 1331.80k 4307.67k 12579.70k 24035.33k 32322.90k
<5> the latter with gcc 4.1.1
<3> Absolutely fascinating. ;)
<5> Tron: Taken from a rumour on the NetBSD lists that it's faster. wanted to see for myself.
<5> need to test against sparcworks too
<4> "faster" and "slower", in my experience, depends on the software run, and not so much the OS.
<5> Demonen: Clarification: that gcc 4.1 is faster, not NetBSD vs Solaris
<4> I mean, if it takes 0.5 seconds less to start Evolution in NetBSD, that doesn't mean I'll change any day soon.
<4> Nanuq: I'd expect newer compilers to be better...?
<5> not necessarily
<4> Either that or more stable
<5> gcc 3.x wasn't a radical improvement over 2.x on SPARC
<5> but 4.x seems to be an improvement
<4> if it's slower, generates slower executables or is less stable, I'd simply not upgrade.
<5> Demonen: I'd say your problem, though, is using Evolution in the first place.
<5> Demonen: mailx starts up real fast ;)
<10> it may also depend on the type of code compiled
<4> Nanuq: I don't use Evo anymore ;) squirrelmail now :D
<10> md5 uses many tables and unrolled loops
<5> killall-9: the improvement in blowfish isn't as large as aes
<4> killall-9: ofcourse, compiling unstable or poorly written code is no way to test the comiler.
<4> It'll have to be known stable code that is comparable across compilers.
<4> Ah, another thing that might improve a compiler, that is not speed or stability, is featurefullness
<5> Demonen: apparently gcc 4 is really anal
<10> what about the speed of the compiler itself? and memory usage?
<5> haven't tested
<10> i had some problems especially when compiling c++ code with templates
<4> Developers and gentooers will be happy if it compiles faster, I'm sure.
<10> noticeable difference 2 -> 3 -> 4
<10> also stricter error checking in newer versions is a PITA if it's not your code to change
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
apache dancing
opheon
#MissKitten
#AllNiteCafe
#php
object expected error declaring javascript constant
#c
#java
#c
skype last seen
|
|