| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Comments:
<0> 5.52
<1> it's like this fscking codec war being waged. I bet the only damn thing changing is interlan p***word/decoder
<1> CFSworks: yeah that's the newest. tried zip or gzip? best best might be google
<2> hmm. isnt' there any way I can select ssh 'sessions' from a menu, instead of typing in the entire p***word/username/url each time?
<2> putty for example has really nice profiles you can create - but i thought tehre should be something similar on linux?
<1> vIkSiT: you maen to autologin?
<2> XyZzY, well, something like that - i don't mind putting in a p***word each time - SSH keys are one option - but i don't want to type "$ssh user@really.long.url
<1> esshsh? you can make a public/private key pair for autologin
<0> I googled quite a bit.
<3> vIkSiT: so do what I do...make a hosts entry...
<2> Steakk, ah. but user name?
<3> ssh user@host
<3> all you gotta do
<2> hmm
<3> for me, my file server is `ssh jason@file`
<3> easy enough done
<2> yep. ok, and another thing - since i need to ssh into machine 1, to be able to ssh into machine 2 (on THAT local network) .. any way to automate this?
<3> yeah, use a VPN and be done with it :P
<1> vIkSiT: dial?
<1> vIkSiT: nope, sorry - expect
<3> yeah, my boot drive for my file server is officially dead
<3> freezer trick didnt even work
<3> my boss will get a kick outta that
<3> hell, he will prolly give me a spare 100gig drive of his
<3> lord knows he has about 400 of them (seriously)
<1> oooo free drives
<1> get 4 and raid5 them :)
<3> hehe
<4> Steakk: freezer rtick?
<4> trick
<2> Steakk, hehe, proble is that CTCP or whatever it is that MS uses isn't built into my kernel - and i don't want to recompile the whole thing !
<2> XyZzY, dial? expect? this isn't a modem command is it?
<1> vIkSiT: yeah, but can be used that way iirc
<2> ah interesting
<2> lmao
<2> i just got PMd a message about how you can hack into an apache server
<2> (on freenode)
<3> is it valid?
<3> I run apache, what is it? I'll try it on myself
<1> wget http://site/robots.txt
<3> ...
<3> nite all
<2> haha, no its not..
<2> its an exploit for an older apache version - i think
<2> XyZzY, you mount your pillow? you do know mounting is much more fun when done to other <stuff?>
<5> question: what is /dev/pts
<5> I could not remember
<6> pseudo-ttys
<6> STDIO stuff
<6> tty
<6> err... `tty` :)
<5> yap -> man pts
<6> man, then google, then ask :P
<7> hi !
<8> hello there
<8> anyone knows how to spot a pronorgaphic website, in his HTML data ?
<8> execept by fetching keywords like ***, anal...
<7> SweD: except that you could write some program into some programming language that could attempt to detect a tit or a piece of *** into a picture or video, then the answer is no
<5> SweD: http://www.xnxx.com
<5> :>
<7> cyberpunk: hey dude www.qmov.com beat ya!
<5> okay...
<7> will enjoy it
<7> lol
<8> so, i just have to make a blacklist ?
<7> that site is so nasty that im even affraid of it
<5> no, I'm at work...
<7> SweD: des right
<8> oki thanks
<7> SweD: you could use some list from some porn blockers as net anny or so
<7> nanny*
<5> hey
<5> join #cyber*** or #pr0n
<7> thats right
<7> good idea
<7> just capture all the traffic that goes into the screen
<7> xD good idea cyberpunk im impressed
<5> np :)
<9> drunkbitch: The ignorant generally are easy to impress.
<7> Shadur: YOU it had to be you i hope that life someday wil put me into your path to **** your face up
<7> What a son of abitch !
<7> Shadur: you can ban me btw
<9> drunkbitch: You're welcome to come over and try any time.
<7> Shadur: **** YOU
<10> ohh
<7> AND YOUR ****ING CAT
<10> katana-fooder
<9> But be a dear and come over when you're sober. I'd feel bad about having to beat the **** out of a drunk moron.
<10> aww. sorry, Rens.
<9> [09:34] <7> You miserable son of a bitch im looking forward to know you
<9> [09:35] <7> then youl see what im made of
<9> [09:35] <7> blow me slut
<9> Rev: Don't be.
<9> [09:36] <7> anyways whats your ****ing problem ?
<9> [09:36] <7> you seem to have some kind of psychological problem
<9> [09:36] <7> but im glad
<9> [09:37] <7> hence you will pay
<11> heh
<11> Same old same old eh?
<10> pfft
<9> [09:38] <9> Sure thing. Here's a quarter - your mom told me that's your going rate.
<11> Buahaha
<9> Childish, I know, but.
<12> Shadur: sometimes still the best..
<10> everyone deserves to have a little fun :P
<9> [09:40] <7> Dude youre doomed il never forget about this, i was remembering the kind of son
<9> of a bitch that you where and i just loked at your nick and told myself "this guy
<9> is a real bad person", in fact i was going to send you to **** yourself the first
<9> time u joined the channel but then i regreted, some people like you never change
<9> Oh noes. A hysterical retard from argentina has a personal grudge against me.
<13> Oh the Humanity!
<13> Mornin'
<13> Shadur: Got another new admirer I see.
<11> Mornin Tron :)
<13> Revenger: *poik*
<13> AH ****it. */msg's Reve*
<9> The true irony there is in the fact that I was /about/ to embark on an interesting discussion on the state of image recognition software, coupled with the fact that actual *human* people can't always agree on what constitutes porn and what doesn't, and how it might be possible to train a neural network to recognize porn the way we train spam filters when drunkbitch flipped from 'polite moron' to 'hysterical idiot'.
<11> Eh, bitch, I want to change my mobile plan to make things cheaper and that part of the online service is offline, bah!
<13> Shadur: One puritanical's porn is another person's picture of a hick in a bathing suit, after all.
<13> s/hick/chick/
<14> Shadur: hmm, you really think something like that would work for cl***ifying porn?
<14> actually, how to google do it?
<14> their safesearch crap is fairly decent
<13> smsie: Oh mornin'
<14> mornin
<14> I have to find (from somewhere) the motivation to go to work
<13> smsie: I suspect Google employ human beans to look at the pictures somehow, unless of course they have - being Google - some real kick*** pr0n detection algorythms or summat.
<9> smsie: No, it wouldn't - but it would work for cl***ifying what one user would consider porn.
<14> Tron: that's a LOT of humans!
<13> smsie: S'pose so.
<9> It'd have to start learning almost completely from scratch for a new user, or at best be prepared to overwrite 90% of its existing net during the new bonding phase.
<12> Shadur: and then you've the question of what's pr0n, and what's art?
<14> shaadso bascially some kind of image recognition coupled with bayesian type learning then?
<14> heavy on CPU, but then CPU is cheap as ****
<9> smsie: Essentially.
<14> Shadur: sounds like a phd project to me. Maybe google would fund it :)
<9> whyzzyrd: Actually, I'm envisioning the system asking the user "I think this is porn. Am I right? I think this is not porn. Am I right?" continuously, and recording the yesses and nos from the user to tweak its net until it gets a yes 99% of the time.
<10> dspam-pron :P
<10> hell
<13> Shadur: <neural-net> "So, this one here "picture of a nekkid babe lying down on a sandy beach" is pr0n, but this one here "picture of a painting of a naked female lying on a bed" is not pr0n? WTF? I'm confused! *whimper*
<9> Tron: Well, yeah. :)
<14> wow, did they have CDs back then even? :)
<13> Shadur: It'll never work. :)
<14> Tron: first rule of pr0n filters: THEY NEVER WORK! People buy them *anyway*
<9> smsie: That's the first and second rule, actually. :)
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#php
#linux
#linuxhelp
window.scrollTo bug IE onload
upsmon91a.tar
#MissKitten
#chatzone
jenifervideo
jukafe
~ERAFSWD.TMP
|
|