| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> +320 at the casino this evening
<1> Cynic: good, buy me a gift ;)
<0> hehe
<2> hi
<0> i could probably buy a canadian dollar for you ;)
<1> Cynic: I see enough of those.
<2> smbmount seems not to be available abymore. any idea ?
<0> gribouille: mount -t smbfs?
<2> Cynic, does it do the same ?
<3> hoi Cynic
<2> mount: unknown filesystem type 'smbfs'
<3> gribouille: what distribution ?
<2> Lion-O, Fedora Core 5
<3> gribouille: make sure it supports the filesystem. iirc you can do so by checking /proc/filesystems. The manual will also help.
<2> Lion-O, smbfs is not in /proc/filesystems
<3> well, that explains that.
<2> Lion-O, how can I add support for it ?
<2> do I have to modprobe a kernel module ?
<3> gribouille: I'd start by checking up with the userguide(s), it should tell you more on accessing window shares. Otherwise focus on the samba documentation, probably somewhere in /usr/share/doc/*
<4> NanuqXXV?
<4> birthday?
<1> Jostein: si
<4> right. lets read the topic every once in a while :P
<0> not yet...
<4> congrats :)
<1> Cynic: 12:10 EDT ;)
<3> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Samba?highlight=%28samba%29
<3> amazing what one can find by merely looking and reading.
<4> Lion-O: heh
<3> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/PackageChanges/UpdatedPackages?highlight=%28smbmount%29
<3> ...or by using a search engine
<4> when I was young, they didnt call Linux "Linux". They called it CP/M!
<0> well when *I* was young...
<0> you guys were all still old!
<4> and you needed a c128 to boot it!
<0> *hide*
<3> I can't help wonder what would have happened if bg didn't jump in with big talk and no brains.
<3> for its time cp/m was quite advanced, it sure featured some major options which can be found on Linux today. Like, for example, virtual consoles.
<4> yeah
<4> surely was better than silly DOS
<5> then again, so was an abacus :)
<5> hey Cynic, Jostein, Lion-O
<0> yo oxd
<4> er... hi
<3> Hi OxD
<5> hey guys, wanna take a look over http://quotesdev.linuxops.net. see if there's anything blatently broken?
<4> nice
<4> you got rid of Steakk's fugly "CSSed" HTML :)
<0> lol, I love the error messages
<0> I put alphas in the Quote # field and got "**** you, Jack***"
<5> hehe
<5> Jostein: not quite. mostly Steakk's work. i did some random css cleanup last night. fixing spacing and other little things
<5> i still need to lart that boy with a template system
<4> hmmm
<4> no SQL injections. boring
<0> django would be perfect for the quotes task </propaganda>
<5> hm. that error message is a bit broken
<4> yup
<4> starts **** on the right and the rest is on the next line on the left
<5> hm. not even quite sure how
<6> Geezus, I cna't believe how stupid users can ****ing be. I tell a guy _4_ times to put http://domain.com:port where port is repalced with the port his server is runnign on and he goes, "I put in http://domain.com but I don't see a box on the page to put in the port". WTF.
<5> Falchion: i told a user, via e-mail that to start or stop apache it is 'apachectrl [stop | start]' and guess what they e-mailed back?
<3> OxD: that its apachectl ? ;)
<4> Falchion: heh
<5> Lion-O: err. ok no. i had that right :P
<6> OxD: That you're wrong and it is apachectl (or apache2ctl) stop|start? :)
<4> OxD: that you're wrong as usual?
<5> they copied and pasted that same line and the error from bash when they tried to run it exactly as i put it
<6> hehe OxD, you have been, as the kids today say, been pwnd. ;)
<4> heh
<5> apparently they think its using mod_psychic
<6> OxD: hehe
<5> actually, the best was me trying to use sudo on a client box yesterday
<3> uh oh
<7> meep!
<5> after looking at sudo -l like 8 times trying to run a command and wondering why it wouldn't let me i realize i had to do this:
<5> sudo /usr/local/bin/sudo su [someuser]
<3> huh ?
<7> why twice?
<6> OxD: I had a user screaming baout how their host doesn't work and they told me the host name. We spend 3 back and forths in email where I'm like, "it doesn't exist" and he repl;ies "It does but isn't working!". He misspelled his damn hostname when he told me it. So to me, it looked liek it, and their account, were removed due to inactivity. I hate retards
<5> because thats how they defined it :)
<8> That's pretty ****ing stupid
<3> OxD: what do you mean defined? Defined what ?
<8> Ergo, looks like solaris :)
<5> Lion-O: in sudoers
<5> PolarWolf is right
<6> That's what you get when your server is admined by the special olympics.
<3> OxD: the command to use su ?
<5> but thats neither here nor there. these guys are idiots but won't let us have root
<3> OxD: this really makes no sense at all.
<4> OxD: a little late, but still
<4> OxD: http://images.kjonigsen.net/jkn/misc/pwny.jpg
<5> Lion-O: no. none.
<3> OxD: so why use it twice?
<5> Lion-O: its their stupidity. they put the /usr/local/bin/sudo part into the sudoers file
<5> Lion-O: because they aren't fit to have root
<3> OxD: so ? that shouldn't stop you from using sudo once.
<5> yeah it does
<8> Lion-O: Sure it does
<8> Lion-O: sudo only allows executing of the "exact" command, and the exact command in this case includes a second sudo
<5> because you have to run the exact command it specifies
<5> PolarWolf: with the full path, nonetheless
<8> Lion-O: Which is pretty ****ing stupid, but hey
<8> OxD: *nod*
<3> aaah, they put in a sudo command in the file and ***igned it to the users?
<5> Jostein: hahaha
<6> Security through obscurity? :) heh
<5> Lion-O: yep
<5> Falchion: dude it had me baffled for a few minutes
<3> OxD: makes you wonder how they planned to getting security. oh well.
<6> OxD: So do zippers and buttons though ;)
<5> i kept doing sudo su [user]
<6> OxD: Which is what it should have been
<5> right
<6> We got that part :P
<5> Jostein: hahaha that reminds me
<4> nice eh?
<5> same ***hats. at some level or another we have write access to a shell script executed as sudo
<5> err s/as/via/
<8> BTW, what heeps you from simply using 'su' outright?
<8> The lack of a p***word?
<5> PolarWolf: no. ****ing. clue.
<5> thats what we usually use
<5> this one user account must be shared or something
<8> OxD: Recommend the admins to be replaced :)
<4> heh
<5> PolarWolf: been doing that
<4> OxD: paging is broken
<8> Didn't go down well, eh?
<4> OxD: brose to the next page and you still get the last quote from the previous page
<5> for all their complex efforts to keep us and developers from being able to have root we could edit a script called by a script called by sudo and do whatever we want
<3> oh well, this clearly indicates why sudo is evil :P
<5> Jostein: thats the way it always was. i think we decided to do that
<8> **** that, just use it properly
<3> one needs selinux or better; rbac control a la Solaris 8)
<5> uh, yeah. don't let it run things the users can edit
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
mayleen.de
whataham
#linux
aw gisem
#london
tal+hajta
#mirc
#linux
gentoo xterm: error while loading shared libraries: libXaw.so.8
#php
|
|
