| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Comments:
<0> ahhh
<0> ThomasM: yeah that might be it
<1> And we have backup. Finally.
<2> http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/penguincalls3
<0> I was hitting caps-lock constantly when I was trying to press ctrl. so annoying
<3> sweet! i hope the 'hawks win
<3> there. got openvpn working
<4> Bill Parcells is a idiot...jesus...Dallas == choke artists
<5> hmm
<5> dogbert2, are you on linux laptop?
<4> the lappy runs Windows XP
<5> oh ok
<5> do you have vmware on that laptop?
<4> nopers
<5> ok
<1> RainDoctor: Going somewhere with this?
<5> with what?
<5> the conversation?
<6> RainDoctor: What are you trying to get at?
<5> just interested in the pattern of linux lovers
<5> whether they have linux laptops, or linux on vmware, etc
<5> thats all
<1> RainDoctor: Zealot.
<6> wow. We have a ****ing trolls it seems
<6> hehe
<0> ThomasM: its not really my fault. you p***ed the catholic schoolgirl duck.test
<0> ThomasM: you know "giggles like a catholic schoolgirl, dresses as a catholic schoolgirl... its probably a catcholic schoolgirl" :P
<7> I know linux can run on a 386 DX computer.. However, I'm thinking of building a high end system (i.e intel dual core 2).. would I see a huge performance increase vs a regular intel p4 processor?
<8> Whats the best distro of linux ? to start ... i have read too many info but im still not sure :P
<1> Jostein: Your variably concrete hour is coming near, it seems.
<4> depends on what you will use the box for...a pent 4 is enuf power to do most anything with linux at speeds 1Ghz or higher
<0> ThomasM: yeah, Im going to bed
<7> well the thing is the P4 is used by the whole family (6 people total + others sometime), alot of the applications dont run under linux so I plan on getting something just for me
<0> and who the **** is jorey? He keeps coming up when Im trying to nick complete myself :P
<7> and I cant justify buying a P4 in 2007.. i'd rather spend the cash to get a dual core 2
<6> what the **** is a dual core 2?
<0> I think he means a Intel Core 2 Duo
<6> is that a core DUO?
<7> no
<9> syn-ack: two human 'cores' in duo mode
<0> anyway. Im off
<6> libolt: hrm
<8> Does ubuntu works with core 2 duo ?
<7> would asus motherboards be better under linux or intel motherboards?
<4> egad!
<7> hmm i have an emac with mac os x.. the unix shell it has when i open the term window, is that linux?
<10> I went on a date today; now I'm broke
<10> at least it was more entertaining than kicking my self in the nuts and buring some cash
<9> tybalt: can't sit on yoru *** now?
<11> wait till you get maried
<2> splash: jesus christ.
<2> you make my head hurt
<6> D-side: Just a troll. Nothing more
<7> could be some kind of berkeley unix i think if i remember
<6> idiot was asking other stupid **** too
<7> hmmm
<6> splash: Darwin isnt BSD
<10> it also isn't linux
<7> syn-ack - thanks... how about if i replace mac os x with a ppc version of linux? would that work well with the mac hardware?
<10> maybe, maybe not
<10> if the mac is semi old, there's a good chance it will work
<6> splash: why dont you do yourself a favor and just go give your mac to a bum. I bet he could find more use out of it
<7> tybalt - its a g4 1.25ghz 1 gig ram 160 gig hd.. bought it in 2004 from apple
<10> it should work
<7> thanks
<10> if it doesn't, install os x again
<7> right
<7> no loss
<10> don't delete the tiny partitions
<10> they're important to keep no matter what
<7> i dont know anything about mac partitions
<6> tybalt: if its a new world mac, it doesnt matter
<7> doesnt linux wipe out existing parittions anyways when it creates swap,etc
<6> Ran linux on one of my New worlds and I have just wiped the disk
<6> splash: no, you do
<10> only if you tell the installer to
<7> ok so i wont delete them
<6> splash: what type of Mac is this again?
<7> eMac.. they don't sell them anymore to the public
<7> discontinued I think
<6> splash: you can wipe all the partitions on them.
<7> how come?
<2> syn-ack_: you need a macbook. :D
<6> D-side: I know. :p
<7> this will be fun
<12> nobody needs a mac
<6> splash: because the ROM image is saved to the VPROM
<7> trying to connect to my WLAN through my eMac running linux/ppc
<10> you never asked why when I told you not to delete them, why does it matter now that you can delete them?
<2> safemode: shut your ignorant mouth :D
<6> tybalt: on the old worlds its true. You couldnt delete the Rom image from disk. You needed to run it along with OS 7 or whatever you were running
<10> im not talking about that, im saying he dind't bother asking why when I told him not to delete them
<6> D-side: Give me 2500 bucks and I'll get one. :p
<2> syn-ack_: i said macbook, not macbook pro.
<10> but he did when you told him to do it
<2> syn-ack_: that would just be silly. :)
<10> It was odd, that's all
<6> D-side: awww, comon man. :p
<2> syn-ack_: its seriously not worth the expense and you know it
<12> blah, ignorance infers a lack of knowledge, and mac's now just a glorified PC. so it's really an argument over OSX vs linux (in all it's variations) ... I say the only reason to spend the premium for a Mac is the pretentiousness of saying you use a mac and not a PC.
<2> and that statement proves your ignorance. :D
<6> D-side: I know, I just want the status of having the "pro" in the name. :p
<12> D-side: that statement proves my overwhelming insight into the mac populace
<2> safemode: you say tomato, i say "go **** yourself"
<2> :D
<12> i'm not familiar with that song
<2> its hard to have any sight at all when your head is crammed in your *** :D
<12> did sinatra do that version?
<7> now I'm wondering if the drivers from linuxant will work on the linux ppc on the emac
<7> sine im using a wireless nic
<2> you have fun with that.
<6> splash: what teh hell are you doing using dialup anyway? Get with the times man
<6> **** you have an emac...
<6> D-side: at least with Apple the "pro" and regualar macs arent too different... I with MS were like that
<12> D-side: it's not my fault macintosh has turned into nothing more than a unix variant selling itself on the status symbol that it's more expensive than regular PC's so it must be better ideology.
<6> safemode: it is better.
<6> Period.
<12> syn-ack: it's intel based. that makes it impossible to be better.
<12> show me a mac running an athlon ...then i'll have to think about it.
<12> P4's are a **** processor. period
<6> safemode: name me another intel based PC with EFF or ANY other x86 for that matter
<6> safemode: Show me a PC that doesnt have legacy hardware or even the CONTROLLERS for them
<12> Syn-ack: name a reason why supporting legacy has anything to do with supporting current hardware?
<6> safemode: show me anther vender who specfically writes their software for ONE hardware profile
<10> xbox game makers
<10> burrrrn
<12> syn-ack: x86 in itself is a legacy ... so mac has moved to x86, it's not going to avoid the pitfalls of legacy support.
<6> they arent 86, tybalt
<10> you didn't specify that
<7> if I put a 750GB or 1TB HD in my new linux box will linux see it completely?
<6> tybalt: touche
<12> splash: if the motherboard can.
<7> thanks safemode
<7> i'm reading that intel motherboards support linux better than other brands
<7> i.e asus
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
gbejniet moxxi
#apache
#c++
c++ SPI_SETMOUSE
pagina con 4 frames
#AllNiteCafe
SIOCSIFFLAGS Invalid Arguments
What country lifted a ban on Aristotle, Shakespeare and Dickens on February 11th
grabar imagen rar ubuntu
#chatzone
|
|