| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Comments:
<0> it's either samn small linux or linux from scratch
<1> should be able to get a p233MMX for < $20
<1> so a 486? toss it.
<2> Nanuq: they can be used as firewalls
<3> Nanuq you are in right position but im newbie it will be cool to learn on that machine
<1> Jostein: mehh..
<2> donvlto: no it wouldnt
<2> donvlto: learning about a new OS thaht requires some fiddling on the slowest hardware possible is not a "good idea"
<3> well im wrong :)
<3> smart idea :P
<3> but
<2> you are abusing your enter key again. also you are mistaking smileys for punctiation
<0> x11 would be painfully slow on that even
<2> XyZzY: can you even RUN X11 on 16mbs RAM?
<3> whats the chances to get that hard disk put on this machine and install on that hard disk a small linux server with this pc than with grub ill be able to load and chose two oses
<4> of course you can
<2> with patience :P
<4> no, it's not really slow ... just sometimes a bit laggy
<2> koollman: I refuse to use machines slower than the NIC itself *grin*
<3> what about my idea?
<4> the problem is to run anything using X11 :)
<5> Jostein: what a liar you are.
<5> Jostein: your choice of OS refuses. not you.
<5> windowsboy. :D
<2> HAHAHA
<2> for the record... this laptop, even with Vista loaded is the snappiest **** Ive ever used
<5> mmhmm
<6> hmm... very annoying. cant' get vpn to even show up in my dd-wrt page
<6> even after upgrading its firmware
<2> D-side: Intel Core2Duo, 2GHz, 2GB Ram and a 1920x1200 panel with some decent Nvidia graaphics
<5> Jostein: vista just doesn't impress me.
<5> Jostein: oooh. nice display.
<2> yup
<3> vista in italian means look
<5> Jostein: can it play 1080p HD? :)
<6> i'll wait for a while before I upgrade to vista
<6> my lappie can run it
<2> D-side: I tested it with a 120fps 1080p clip earlier today. 70% CPU usage :D
<2> D-side: probably not REAL fps, but that was the encoding anyway. prolly bunch of empty frames
<5> yeah i understand.
<5> hell, it does it though.
<5> Jostein: thats the specs of my laptop, without that fantastic display though. :)
<2> hehehe
<5> the main difference of course being mine is way cooler. :D
<2> Its a dell latitude D820
<2> D-side: how come ?
<5> Jostein: its a macbook. :D
<2> I was about to ask if it was a fag macbook :P
<5> **** you. :D
<2> anyway, I like this laptop
<2> I like this laptop very much
<5> you should.
<5> it sounds great if you can put up with its OS limitations. i'm not even kiddin.
<5> g
<5> hardware wise i'm sure theres nothing at all wrong with it.
<7> dude, 2006 was so last year. What?
<2> D-side: Atm I'm kinda just trying out Vista. If it pisses me off too much, I'll just go with a wipe and install Windows XP on it
<5> Jostein: i meant windows in general
<5> Jostein: im sure vista has to be better than xp.
<5> i even said that with a straight face!
<2> D-side: well. its a work laptop. work is MS-work, and apart from a few lackings, I dont mind Windows as a desktop OS
<7> vist is not giong to better than XP
<2> D-side: it has a few OSX qualities actually. like the composited GUI
<2> which IMO is very nice
<7> because MS is going to be able to do what ever the **** they want on your system with or without your concent
<7> legally
<7> technically they can do that now
<6> this ****s I can't have vpn on my router.
<2> tybalt: even as a MS-whore I posted this on my site: https://jostein.kjonigsen.net/articles/124/MS_Vista_is_the_longest_suicide_note_ever_written.aspx
<6> oh well. attempt to get pptp installed on my linux desktop
<2> cappicard: why not L2TP/IPSec?
<5> cappicard: dear god.
<5> cappicard: why no vpn on the router again?
<5> you can't figure it out or technical limitation?
<6> it's limited to 8Mb of flash ram
<5> ew dude.
<7> you can install a SD reader on it
<7> using a floppy cable
<7> http://uanr.com/sdfloppy/
<6> i could do that. but i'll just set up my linux desktop as a vpn server for my laptop
<7> why not use a SMB mount?
<5> cappicard: fine, but why the hell use pptp?
<6> i'll figure out openvpn then
<5> cappicard: thats a good choice too.
<5> i'm using ipsec but mainly because its ridiculously easy for me to do it
<8> hello everyone.
<8> got a question. how can i list all of the directories within a particular directory? i tried ls -d, but it only gives '.' as the only directory
<8> i am trying to write a make file, and want all the directories to be ***igned to a particular variable
<4> find . -type d
<9> koollman: That's recursive.
<2> koollman: we dont do spoonfeeding in here
<8> great. that seems to work
<7> whats wrong with telling him the command
<7> it was one command, not some system
<4> Jostein: that is just a beginning ... he will need more
<2> tybalt: it still is against channel policy
<2> tybalt: if people are too inept to read man-pages, they really shouldn't be using linux
<8> strange attitude...i guess if someone points in some direction and that saves some time, it shouldn't be wrong
<2> immad: hinting and directiong people towards the answer is usually fine in here. telling them flat out on basic stuff usually not
<7> I think it's just apathy
<8> i am rather new. learning as i go and this is only the second makefile i am writing. still have to learn and read some stuff but when you have to finish a task, you try to find answers a bit quickly
<7> There isn't a thing wrong with it, I was able to teach my self how to program because of people helping me out in the same way.
<7> and now I get paid for my skills in programming
<2> tybalt: if you doubt the philosophy of this policy, you should hang out here during lamer-hour
<7> what's time?
<2> god we get lots of retards wanting us to do their work for them, because they are too inept to do it themselves
<7> what time, rather
<8> this attitude reminds of lisp programmers :) its a powerful language, but u have to be more accomodating of beginners
<2> lamer-hour is a variable constant :P
<7> generally, what time does it aproximate
<2> what I'm trying to say is that it's not a specific hours, just that every day seems to have its peak of lamers asking stupid ****
<4> Jostein: imho, that was not a lame question ... and I know I can miss things in find's man page ... and the makefile is not finished, too
<2> koollman: I never said he was a lamer, though
<2> If I had been upset here, people would have been kicked :D
<4> sure :)
<5> Jostein: settle down there mr sensitive.
<2> D-side: coming from you :P
<5> :D
<2> D-side: want me to whine about not having a GF instead?
<2> because I'm sure I can fake some semi-decent whining
<4> you could whine about not having a sun fire x4500 ... it's easier (except if you have one)
<9> Jostein: Is there a way to list all fulltext indices in MSSQL 2k5?
<2> ThomasM: should be. try SELECT * FROM sys.indexes
<2> ThomasM: Im pretty sure it has its own type
<7> Computers are useless, they can only give you answers.
<9> I didn't copy the full text files, and now it's refusing to back up the database without 'em. :)
<2> hehehe
<2> ThomasM: I always transfer DBs with the wizards or a full backup
<2> ThomasM: less messy
<5> Jostein: man, on that topic, you wouldn't be faking. :D
<4> tybalt: Pic***o ?
<2> D-side: Only the whining would be fake. Im pretty much too lazy to care
<7> koollman, I dont understand, what are you asking?
<5> Jostein: mmmhmm. :)
<4> tybalt: it's a quote of Pablo Pic***o, right ?
<7> Im pretty sure he died way before computers were around.
<7> I take that back
<7> I don't know if it is or not.
<4> tybalt: hum ... I just checked ... I was correct ...
<4> well ... now I should sleep :)
<2> I hope that makes him feel left out :P
<8> thanks for the help. $(shell find . -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d) worked fine.
<7> I felt proud of my self when I completed my first useful script
<5> as you should have.
<7> It searched through directories recursively or non-recursive, did a search and replace in all the files and preserved the origional last modified timestamp
<7> it was perl though
<7> not a shell script
<9> Jostein: Couldn't actually get a list of them (at least, not a good one--they were reference values in sysobjects and sysindexes, rather than the index name), but if I tell it to back up, it gives me the name of an index it can't find, and then I can just use 'sp_fulltext_catalog' to drop it. I think the problem may actually be that this is SQL 2k5 express and no fulltext capabilities are installed.
<2> ahhh
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
scary picers
precompiled header file is from a previous version of the compiler, or the preco
#php
Undernet Montreal
similaritytable_1 8gig
#asm
geekbox howto chmod
#php
foxx qalbek
#linuxhelp
|
|