| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Comments:
<0> its damn cold..
<1> its pretty mild for a .no january
<1> heh
<1> afaik it should be standard jouliet
<0> threw it into the plextor (usb) instead
<1> silus: ENGLISH YOU ****
<2> silus: You've already been kicked once, retard.
<3> i just don't give **** about you 2
<3> :=)
<3> gye
<1> whitecap: you pre-ruined the ball
<4> figured you were too drunk by now
<1> nope
<1> not even close
<1> in fact, since new years Ive had next to NO alcohol in the house
<2> Used it all up in one night?
<2> Speaking of alcohol... back in a flash.
<1> nah. it was a tiresome all-christmas effort
<0> ... he only used up mine :p
<5> wither that or a flashback...
<1> anyway. I swear to god I love this laptop
<1> most responsive ****er Ive ever had
<2> There's very little difference between coding VB sober or drunk, anyway. Might as well get to it.
<1> ThomasM: heh
<1> ThomasM: coding VB gives you a headache. need something to clear it up
<2> It's actually VB.NET for this customer, so it's not _too_ terrible. Just midling terrible.
<2> And on top of it all, in order to squeeze this DB down, I attached it to my testing server (SQL 2K5) and just did some TRUNCATE TABLE and DROP TABLE calls, and now it's no longer compatible with SQL 2K. I have to install SQL 2K5 on this box, and then migrate. ****ing A.
<1> ThomasM: you ARE aware that in SQL server you can set a DB to compatability level 80 right?
<1> that should essesially make it behave and act like SQL Server 2000
<2> Jostein: Even then. Went googling, and the compatibility level is still right. The file identifies itself as 80. But it can no longer be run by SQL 2K.
<1> ThomasM: backup it up and then restore it
<1> should do the trick
<1> back it up on 2k5 and restore one 2k
<1> s/one/on/
<2> Okay. That's better than a DTS job.
<1> ThomasM: SSIS job thank you :P
<0> g'night..
<1> K_F: night
<5> if you had two servers/instances you could just replicate the data across
<1> XyZzY: too much work. plus it might alter the DBs in question depending on replication settings
<2> Hmm. Cheap scotch and diet coke.
<1> ThomasM: keep the coke away from the prevcious scotch damnit!
<2> Jostein: Not precious. $16.50 a bottle. It's not sacrilege unless you pay at least $40-$50 for the bottle.
<2> And it's damn good, anyway.
<0> $40 for a bottle of scotch? thats one cigar damn it
<2> K_F: $40 was the lowest I saw for any single malt.
<1> ThomasM: its still scotch, not bourbon :P
<6> i have an old 486
<6> 512 mb
<6> what kind of linux server can i install on it?
<1> speaking of single-malt, I will have a gl***, and then I will have no more single-malt until payday :(
<6> 512 mb hard disk :)
<2> Saw a 25-year-old Macallan, for $450.
<1> ThomasM: well. anything >18 is expensive, no doubt
<6> any sugestion
<2> K_F: And you really pay $40 for a cigar?
<2> donvlto: What are you hoping to do with it?
<0> ThomasM: its not totally unknown...
<6> well an shell server
<6> small one
<2> K_F: Yeah, but.
<0> ThomasM: a Romeo and Julietta - Churchill is about 40
<0> I generally go for the short-churchill which is 32 ..
<2> :P
<1> donvlto: then any distro will do, as long as you dont install too much ****
<1> donvlto: you can go worse than the debian netinstall
<7> Jostein: I could never figure out this scotch thing.
<0> but right... sleep
<2> I can understand the desire, but I'll have to be nicely ****ing rich before I pay $32 for a cigar.
<1> Nanuq: what about it?
<6> i planed to install ubuntu server
<6> its enough place 512 mb hard disk?
<1> Never tried Ubuntu -server-, but I cant imagine it taking too much space as long as you keep it shell and shell only
<7> Jostein: How anyone could pay that much for it, how anyone could stand the taste, ***uming it's not unlike the stuff I'd in London with Russ.
<1> just dont install X
<1> Nanuq: it tastes -awesome-, rich and ... just ****ing awesome
<1> Nanuq: thats why people pay for it
<6> does all linux
<6> have server
<7> Jostein: I think it was the peat bit that I couldn't stand.
<6> like ubuntu
<6> than fedora
<6> ?
<1> donvlto: are you stupid?
<6> i mean server edition
<6> eheh
<6> :)
<6> im newbie not stupid
<6> :)
<8> i just got back but i'm voting yes.
<7> Jostein: Is that the defintion?
<1> donvlto: a server is just a daemon running on the box, its not a dedicated OS
<2> donvlto: Could you perhaps be kinder to your enter key?
<2> Or, that.
<8> indeed.
<7> re Aahz
<7> D-side
<7> Jostein: feh, definition? one characteristic of a fine scotch?
<1> D-side: I was sorta lazy but I was going there after my last message :P
<1> you beat me to it though
<5> unless he meant deadrat enterprise edition
<1> Nanuq: strong, unique, clear, pure taste
<7> Jostein: where does this peatiness come in?
<1> Nanuq: it should almost overwhelm you tastebuds and you will need to let the taste ease in gradualy
<7> Jostein: that's not telling me anything.
<5> Nanuq: probably just slightly after your face hits the turf ;)
<7> if it's anything like the stuff I'd in London, then it's rubbish, and I want no part of it.
<1> Nanuq: its something you have to experience :)
<7> gin, otoh..
<1> Nanuq: it's like coffee. an aquired taste
<5> the good tequila is very smooth
<7> Jostein: acquired
<7> Jostein: at those prices, though.. hell I'm really skipping on the ethanol these days.
<7> Jostein: tea is so much cheaper.
<5> Nanuq: could make your own ethanol
<1> XyZzY: but not a fine whisky
<5> Jostein: well you could but the equipment is not really cheap then
<7> XyZzY: yeah yeah
<7> XyZzY: but at the end of the day, what's it really doing for me?
<6> why i get banned :)
<6> im asker :)
<5> that's the facinating bit. people seem to spend mega-bucks on booza and sports. often in conjunction with each other. go figure
<1> donvlto: because you constantly press enter as opposed to the "." key, that is why
<1> donvlto: well... that and other reasons
<6> ahhh okey :) i must write to one line its okey no :)
<6> im just linux lover
<6> and every machine that i got i want to install linux :))
<1> right
<1> and still you dont know that ANY linux distro can be a "server"?
<6> than i just wonderet to know that in this machine that i goted i think is 486 with 16 mb ram and 512 hard disk
<6> hey i know
<6> but i wanted to say wich from all distros
<6> is the best one :) for that machine
<9> softlanding system
<6> ill get hte hard disk and ill put the machine on recycle bin
<6> best option right :))
<1> donvlto: get damn small linux then
<6> on that machine ?
<1> on 16mb ram you can hardly run much anyway, so... I say ditch the entire POS really
<10> damn... can't get vpn installed on my wrt54g v6
<7> donvlto: this is 2007. toss it.
<1> but if you want to try to put linux on it, try "damn small linux"
<6> Nanuq :) thats the best option :)
<6> Jostein thx :)
<5> it's either samn small linux or linux from scratch
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
sam undernet almighty
ubuntu oki b4200
rebuild hibernation partition vaio
MIGNUN
#linux
#c++
#php
#MissKitten
african takewando
std::equal_to
|
|