| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Comments:
<0> HellRAzorDV: 'man p***wd'
<1> .. or lack thereof
<2> something that you're apparently trying to avoid at all costs.
<3> what u talkin` about ?
<2> so once you figure out where the p***word would be stored, you'll have your answer.
<2> wtf? is that a backtick?
<2> did you just use a backtick at me?
<1> what about the "u"?
<2> yea, i figured that was a typo or something.
<2> regardless, there is no u here.
<4> HellRAzorDV: please spell your words out
<5> **** the u, he used a backtick! Get him!
<3> lol
<2> i think 1 char nicks aren't valid on undernet.
<2> lollerskates!
<2> ah.
<3> ok , thanks for your cooperation
<2> i didn't see that. explains everything.
<3> tnx for the help
<2> not familiar with tnx.
<2> i know thx is the stock symbol for the houston experience.
<1> is it similar to THX? the sound certification system..
<6> anyone here?
<2> bong hits are best within 60 seconds of waking up.
<7> =-)
<6> whitecap
<6> can y ask you something?
<7> Dj_Drako: safer to ask the channel
<1> I'd say the answer is no, given his absence
<2> no, he can't.
<2> y isn't a valid undernet nick, i just went over this.
<0> NineVolt: X is ;)
<1> NineVolt: well, are you sure?
<6> look how can i open a port from my pc
<6> if i am using redhat
<2> as far as i know 1-char nicks are restricted.
<0> Dj_Drako: start something which listens to it.
<2> c is the opless channel bot...
<2> w is missing in action...
<2> but they're all restricted.
<8> there hasn't been a W for years
<8> since .ro went haywire
<2> i know :P
<0> smsie: naah. W briefly reappeared last year iirc ;)
<9> Simba!
<0> Hi there cheeksy
<0> cheeksy: had a nice vacation?
<9> Lion-O: aha :o)
<6> cheeksy
<6> sorry ... but please can u help me
<9> no
<4> Dj_Drako: please spell your words out
<0> cheeksy: didnt you go out on vacation?
<6> ssh
<1> Lion-O: the "no" was for Dj_Drako , you got your answer already..
<1> :)
<6> come on someone
<6> how can i open my ports
<0> Dj_Drako: I already told you dimwit
<0> Dj_Drako: why oh why do I get this annoying feeling that you're messing about on a server which isn't your own?
<1> Lion-O: anyways, in summary she went to cancoon to get laid... :p
<9> Lion-O: i left China. Now I am back :o)
<0> cheeksy: I know, and I asked you how your vacation was. Seems you're still not too sober because you only said "aha" :P
<1> reading one book, writing another, yet I can't find anything more to multitask
<9> Lion-O: its a very Russian way :o)
<0> cheeksy: I see ;)
<0> cheeksy: say, did you happen to meet king kong on your way or... ? ;)
<10> vacation in africa?
<9> Lion-O: oh i should send you my pic in ghannian outfit :o)
<10> what is wrong with people.. first strider, now cheeksy
<9> lol
<1> hmm, a 107 year old nigerian man married a 30 year old women this week..
<0> cheeksy: now what did you do? :P
<10> K_F: well, that is one way to kill off your elderly population...
<9> Lion-O: ummmm i put on weight?
<0> cheeksy: so no marrying 107 year old guys? ;) phew! :)
<9> Lion-O: oh i am not 30. so it is definitely not me ;o)
<0> cheeksy: I bet you'd lie to the press about your age :)
<10> Lion-O: well duh. she is female..
<9> Lion-O: i am one big fat liar :o)
<0> cheeksy: cool!
<10> women have that one well covered.. it's a public secret that they lie about their age, yet noone dares guess or ask about it, for fear of beeing repeatedly stabbed to death in their sleep with a rusty spork..
<9> ;o)
<9> ok night night
<9> i have to switch from GMT to GMT +7
<10> it confuses me that the southern hemisphere, while so distant, use the same timeoznes as up here..
<1> wlfshmn: nobody believes me when I tell them my age in the first place...
<10> we should refere to it as -GMT ;)
<10> K_F: You are 22, but have enough bitterness to p*** for 30? ;)
<1> wlfshmn: something like that yes... although, I only turn 22 in august..
<11> good afternoon
<11> can someone tell me if it's important to deselect stuff you don;t need when compiling a kernel?
<1> not really, that is something you'll have to decide for yourself..
<0> revered: it can be :)
<4> revered: it normally doesn't matter, except maybe in performance
<11> is a lighter kernel necessarily faster?
<1> revered: depends if you build it in or as modules
<1> but most of it will be a theoretical discussion rarely encountered in the real life
<11> hmm i suppose alot of the things i didn;t deselect were set as modules?
<0> revered: check the kernel configuration.
<1> what it most certainly result in is grander build times
<11> yeah so if i deselect everything i don;t need the kernel will just build faster
<0> besides; depending on the situation a fully optimized kernel can present problems in the longer run. For example; if you need to change hardware.
<1> revered: unless you're working with an embedded system, it generally isn't a point of getting it as small as possible
<11> ok
<11> Lion-O: yeah if i decide to put in a tv card, when i've deselected those, i'll have to recompile?
<0> revered: yups. at least re-add the modules again.
<11> what's teh difference between built in and module?
<0> revered: check the kernel HOWTO. It explains all of that.
<10> wwhy can't people just stick to their distributions default kernels?
<1> revered: and read some guides at tldp.org
<11> hmm k ty
<2> amazing ty?
<1> wlfshmn: because it is generally non-sufficient? :p
<2> i've seen her fit the most disturbing things inside herself.
<1> ?
<2> it's great that revered would invoke her name here.
<11> NineVolt: the old one didn;t have SMP, NTFS support and didn;t let me change the screen resolutions..
<2> or perhaps that was a reference to baseball legend ty cobb...
<2> i don't believe any linux has ntfs support.
<12> yes it does
<2> beyond experimental
<11> then maybe i completely misunderstood the compiler?
<2> the only way i've seen ntfs written to is using windows files.
<1> NineVolt: there are some proprietary drivers that could be used
<2> ntfs.sys or something.
<0> NineVolt: well, readonly support is decently stable.
<12> ninevolt: it works absolutely without error here. I'm not sure if it's still flagged as experimental in the kernel config, but tons of stuff is flagged experimental that is stable
<2> i wouldn't run a linux server with ntfs partitions, no.
<12> i've used the write and read. no problems in 2.6.18+
<12> no ****.. why would you?
<12> ntfs support is for troubleshooting windows drives
<2> because it beats fat32?
<12> no other reason to use ntfs at all
<2> haha
<12> or fat32 in a linux box
<2> a lot of people would disagree with you there.
<0> its too fat anyway
<12> why?
<2> because given a choice between fat32 and ntfs, ntfs oftentimes comes out on top.
<12> a linux box wouldn't need ntfs or fat32 partitions to interface with windows machines
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#c++
#chatzone
#linuxhelp
Error importing repomd.xml from base: Error: could not parse file //var/cache/yu
#java
#MissKitten
reset is not a function
#linuxhelp
#linux
gcc tr1 gentoo
|
|