| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Comments:
<0> LOL
<1> If I had the authority to activate DSL accounts and accesspoints in the centrals, I could have fixed this in less than an hour
<1> so far theyve spent over a month. and failed
<2> man... this linksys manual is soo ****ing useless (the wap54g). I only want to know the default IP and username/p***word. I don't need those fancy one-click window-based software solution crap.
<3> Jostein: still nothing?
<4> Lion-O: admin/admin ?
<2> killall-9: perhaps, who knows...
<3> admin/1234 ?
<4> 192.168.1.1
<3> <blank>/admin
<5> admin / blank
<5> http://www.otosoftware.com/wwhelp/Default_Router_Usernames_and_P***words.htm
<2> problem is that this access point is already configured so I need to be 100% sure, no margin for errors.
<1> K_F: yeah. still nothing
<2> oh well....
<1> K_F: guy decided showing up as we had agreed upon wasn't really a viable solution at all
<3> eh
<1> K_F: even less informing me ha wasnt showing up
<3> Jostein: telenor, was it?
<3> drive over to Fornebu
<1> some ****up from a subcontractor called "el-tel"
<3> show up personally, and I'm sure you have it sorted out tomorrow
<5> hmm can anyone tell me something about the routing issue i just mentioned? just put me in the direction to search for
<3> Jostein: it doesn't matter, telenor is responsible for sub-contractors
<1> K_F: problem is... I cant be home tomorrow. I cant be hoem from work until next monday
<1> K_F: THAT was why he was supposed to show up today
<3> fair point
<3> tell them that
<3> and have them show up when you -are- home
<1> I'll call and bitch later
<1> it may be the subcontractor who ****s up, but I am -their- customer and it's their damn responsibility
<3> exactly
<6> welcome to the tangled web of national level telcos and their subcontractors and resellers when they need to co-operate to provision dsl
<6> in .nl the success rate is like 85%
<6> it used to be 60%
<2> hehe
<7> I used to dispatch installers for DirecTV.. its the same crap.
<6> pvda vindt weer een manier om WMV te leveren die het met de microsoft codec op mac niet doet
<6> wat raar is want ik keek hem eerder probleemloos via geenstijl
<6> naja who cares
<6> grr
<6> EWINDOW
<2> exel: Spreek Engels hier! No DUTCH
<8> job well done
<2> exel: wat maak je me NOU ?!?! ;)
<8> nihongo de shabetekudasai
<6> 'asjemenou!?' :)
<9> ENGLISH you Dutchies or prepare to get p***ed on the left hand side
<10> Hi, I wonder if someone out there could help me out with a (probably *very*) simple question that is keeping me stumped. concerns ftp_ing
<2> exel: lol
<11> Yes there is.
<2> exel: seriously; I do agree with you though 8)
<1> docfu: iie
<1> docfu: shigoto ****enakerebanai
<1> mmmhh.. HDTV :P
<2> ooooh, HDTV. Cool! ;)
<10> anyone?
<11> Teletubbies, yeah :)
<12> a rigged one.
<12> one that plays the teletubbies only.
<12> seems Tron's isp ****ed up again
<13> Argh.
<13> Bastards.
<12> inform the human reset switch :P
<13> Revenger: Did that just happen right now?
<12> 20 minutes or so.
<13> fsck
<12> [13:05] [SN] No response from london.uk.eu -- closing link
<8> jostein shigoto wo shinakerebanaranai
<12> bananarama ?
<2> hmm...
<2> Tron: didn't you have Demon ?
<1> docfu: wasnt -that- far of, now was I? :P
<1> docfu: I intended to say "I have to be working" not "I have to work" :P
<8> jostein yeap
<8> the japanese is a double negative saying 'you can't not work'
<1> but dropping the -te in ****e makes it "work" not "working", ne?
<5> anyone know if is is possible to have Router A (2 inet connections have 2 (open)VPN connections to router B(1 inet connections) running of 2 seperate internet connections on the side of router A
<5> if it is where to search for
<2> struct2: I don't think I quite follow... A router which has 2 vpn connections to another router which services the Internet?
<12> can you rephrase that ?
<12> sometime my syntax checker barfed over that one.
<13> Lion-O: I had Demoan dialup for many years whilst I lived in Soctland. I never had Demon in London.
<14> router A ==2x vpn== router B -- inet (that's what I seem to understand)
<12> De-moan ? :P
<13> ;)
<12> sounds like T-Offline :P
<14> *grin*
<13> Demon were one of the best ISP's evar etc. Then they went downhill.
<12> or " Nokia - disconnecting people"
<15> Tron: aren't they still one of the best UK ISPs, relatively speaking?
<5> hmmm thats what i meant yeah
<2> Tron: *nod*. Thus, a decent Scottish firm
<5> problem is in NL i have 1mbit upload
<2> Revenger: say, are you going to CeBIT this year?
<5> in Germany i get max 512kb
<5> and the upload is way to low for reliable transfer for VOIP + data
<5> so i would like to split up the VOIP with the DATA
<12> Lion-O: possible.
<5> on the side of one router..
<11> struct2, with ADSL2+ you can get DSL 16k with 800kbit upload (from Arcor)
<11> in Germany
<12> yeah. but arcor ****s even more than t-offline :P
<15> struct2: hm, you should be able to do that with creative use of iptables + iproute2
<5> point i router A needs to know that i need connection1 for VPN data, and connection 2 VPN for VOIP
<5> hmm but how is the thing called what i am willing to do...
<5> when i search for port based routing i find not much usefull
<11> Revenger, noone here will get that T-Offline joke :P. But then don't do ****y ****y, I love it, they are great
<2> struct2: I don't think you'll fare well with splitting up VOIP traffic. IMO it'd be better to simply re-route to use a different point.
<5> Lion-O? why not?
<15> struct2: lartc.org is usually the starting point for looking into such things
<2> struct2: because it will eventually have to reach a single point.
<5> yeah but on router B there is no bottle neck
<2> struct2: and unless that point can deal with getting 1 datastream originating from 2 places there's no way this is going to work.
<5> there is plenty of room left
<5> hmm i could re-adres the system on side B, which is provides the VOIP data
<5> so it will get an other IP cl***
<5> and for routere A the same
<5> so only point is the routing on router A because it has to send packages to one external ip adress on to different UDP ports
<5> one of the NICS only need to use for the VPN tunnel the other line also used for web,email etc
<5> But how would you prefer to do it?
<16> struct2: qos
<16> read up on priorizing packets, so that the voice packets have higher priority than the data ones
<16> you can also check www.zebra.org
<16> or something
<17> that new thai place seems quite nice, and they sure aren't skimping on spices (with .se standards, atleast)
<5> i have already done that
<16> we have a special saying here that kinda didnt work out translating into english
<5> it qos works much better dan without
<16> struct2: then what seem to be the problem?
<5> well the entire network freezes
<16> s/seem/seems
<16> struct2: then you have done something wrong
<5> no i have not
<16> what do you use for voip?
<5> bandwidth is to low
<5> when i have 6 phonecalls everything goes to the VOIP
<16> struct2: i dont have all day, tell me fast what do you use?
<5> Open VPN
<16> hrm, dude, hardware based phones, softbased phones
<16> what algorigthm?
<5> hmm Asterisk using Octobri cards
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
venet0 point to point configure
Niger Noger
#chatzone
#AllNiteCafe
Aceventura MiSu
#linuxhelp
princhis
help.kdfs.net
#AllNiteCafe
#linuxhelp
|
|