| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Comments:
<0> Revenger: then moderate it :)
<0> haha
<0> what a nickname this dude who EOFed had :)
<1> does it mean something?
<0> FauxReal: probably
<0> Revenger: thanks :)
<1> google had 0 results.
<1> heh
<2> WTF are you doing?!?!
<1> ****.. actually it has 64
<2> I got someone standing in my cube right now...I should fart again
<0> <Steakk> Okay, people are retarded...myself included ... I had jmirc running on my blackberry earlier, said somethin here, and then held the blackberry to my ear, to wait for a response ... like it was a phone call or somethin
<3> bacon
<0> rofl that one is pure genius :))
<3> HAH
<3> someone get that poor sob a computer :P
<4> http://quotes.linuxops.net/index.php?op=view&id=845
<0> oh ****
<0> ive given Ka-bar something to do
<3> lol
<1> comcast hooked up line @home for me.. now wife saying it just redirects to their "new user" page.. Im soooo glad i pay for 8m/1m service at this point
<2> I'm bored
<1> it worked better last night with it hooked up and laying across ground
<4> FauxReal: yeah, they haven't pushed a config down into the cable modem yet, so it's got bogus DNS and a bogus default route. Now you have to call the ****ers and have them finish setting it up for you.
<5> on the bright side, at least you can load their new user page *very fast* :)
<0> lol
<6> bwahahahah
<0> oh ****, siglite is awake
<6> 400+ lines of perl doing all kinds of ****
<6> but the COOLEST thing is my spinny bar.
<6> as it's processing all this text, I have a little text bar that rotates around.
<0> spinny bar?
<6> yeah
<0> lol
<2> O_o;
<2> 400+ lines of Perl for a "spinny bar"?
<4> siglite: that is sooooooo last century
<0> yeah that must be a thrill :)
<6> god no
<0> it also changes colour :)
<6> it's 13 lines of text for my spinny bar.
<6> er, lines of code.
<0> and sometimes, during winter, stops and goes to sleep :)
<6> Ka-bar: of course it si!
<6> er
<6> is
<2> siglite: so, what does the remaining 387+ lines of Perl do?
<6> pulls in all kinds of firewall and ids information and dumps it into a database. Mostly firewall statistical type stuff. Eg, port 137 has been probed 456,293,124 times. **** like that.
<0> try to act like python? :)
<0> ah, nice
<2> werd
<7> dammit, my DSL's downstream seems to be maxing out at ~40-45 kB/s
<0> what ids you using?
<7> I'm paying for a lot more than 300-400 kbps
<0> Liandrin: come to .ro, land of free bw :)
<6> Liandrin: your seeded torrent of goats_gone_wild.avi is eating up your pipe.
<0> siglite: DOWNSTREAM
<0> he's downloading goats_gone_wild_the_sequel.avi
<8> tav
<8> uhm
<0> God, it's 11 pm and im still @ work :(
<2> it must **** to be you
<1> Ka-bar: i was away.. no it was WORKING last night
<1> i did DWDM stuff up north for carter's cable mo network.. i uderstand headend/etc
<0> how do you spell oppinion or opinion?
<5> the latter
<0> thanks
<0> im writing a flame mail right now
<1> for some reason.. last night.. i stipped coax... ran 20 foot over to modem and was grabbing goat_sequal.avi at 8.02mbps
<1> im on same segment... bah anway im at work and wasnt about to try to get IP from wife to remotely poke it
<1> ill figure it out @home
<2> nice...a bookkeeper at my son's school was arrested for embezzling money from the school
<2> allegedly stole US$175,000 over 8 years
<9> embezzle govt cheese...it's better for you
<0> can see that your version is newer than ours. What i want to know if possible, is why must we find out about these changes after we've had problems here and not send it to everyone like you should do?
<0> In my humble opinion, when you guys do make a change and publish a new version, you should send it for everyone and not wait 1 whole day for errors to come, mails from us to arrive and after all this mess you send us the new version.
<0> Thank you very much for sending it!
<0> this is my mail to the management :)
<4> FauxReal: yeah, I've had that happen to me, too.
<10> Hi, I'm trying to get the BIND DNS server set up for my domains. It appears to be working (nslookup mydomain.net x.x.x.x works fine), but when I try to query the server from DNS lookup scripts on the internet, the connection times out. I have port 53 TCP/UDP open in my firewall. What am I missing?
<11> as far as I know comcast BLOCKS port 53
<4> theXW: No, they don't, because I use a different set of DNS servers, because Comcast's DNS servers ****.
<0> ok im done
<0> seems i aint funny no more in here :)
<11> Ka-bar, they block INCOMING port 53 requests therefore u cant run a DNS server from a home machine
<10> can someone try to telnet to my ip port 53 and type some garbage
<10> i have nc running
<10> wait maybe i dont
<4> lawler: Uh, no, do not paste your IP address here
<4> whoops, too late.
<11> root@flipme:/# nslookup www.adelphia.net
<11> c-71-236-81-10.hsd1.pa.comcast.net
<11> ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
<4> theXW: ok, that makes more sense. You don't want to run your own dns server at home over a cable link anyway.
<10> ok this is interesting now....
<4> Liandrin: photography geeks?
<10> # nc -l -p 53
<10> Can't grab 0.0.0.0:53 with bind
<7> so something's listening on port 53 already
<10> is something else trying to listen there?
<10> yeah.
<7> as root, fuser -n tcp 53
<7> that will give you the pid of the process listening on port 53
<10> dnsmasq
<10> ah!
<4> D'oh!
<7> DNS uses UDP for everything but zone transfers, mostly, anyway
<5> Liandrin: its a size thing - it uses tcp for anything that won't fit in one udp packet
<7> nc will let you listen to a UDP port, but the packets are mostly binary, the raw output wouldn't be all that helpful
<7> DaveHowe, I was simplifying
<10> ok comcast definitely does not block 53.
<10> my dns server is running now but i still get the timeout
<7> if they were, your test wouldn't necessarily reveal that
<11> as your test is INTERNAL
<10> Liandrin, theXW: i used a port scan online
<0> ok im heading home, have a good day/night everyone
<7> lawler, ah
<11> root@flipme:~# telnet c-71-236-81-10.hsd1.pa.comcast.net 53
<11> Trying 71.236.81.10...
<11> Connected to c-71-236-81-10.hsd1.pa.comcast.net.
<7> lawler, yes, that's more conclusive ;)
<4> tavi-san: later
<10> can someone nslookup me?
<0> and sorry if i wasnt funny although i really tried, it's 11:20 pm and ive been here for 15 hours :/
<11> root@flipme:~# nslookup www.aol.com c-71-236-81-10.hsd1.pa.comcast.net
<11> ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
<10> that's what i don't get
<2> tavi-san: you think you're funny?
<10> ok, now something is really jacked
<10> i can't nslookup internally anyomre
<11> not too sure whats goin on, but it dont appear to want to work, nor do i understand quite why you want to run bind or a dynamic ip
<10> i'm static
<4> lawler: use dyndns.
<7> Ka-bar, (delayed) yeah, people who are into photography
<4> me! me!
<7> Ka-bar, how's your macro photography skills?
<4> lawler: how did you get a static IP address from Comcast? o_O
<4> Liandrin: I mostly do outdoors stuff....
<10> Ka-bar: i might have a friend in the biz :)
<9> <--award winning photographer
<7> oh really?
<11> c-71-236-81-10.hsd1.pa.comcast.net .. doesnt appear very static to me
<11> looks like the common pool of dynamic addresses..
<9> lol...j/k
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
slm nber sd
#linux
Liviu Pustiu
#linux
happy valantime
bertu ohtu katarin
southpark cancerman
enlightment require
#apache
#AllNiteCafe
|
|