| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Comments:
<0> OldMonk: Hmm, prolly needs a module
<1> ouch!
<1> maybe a simple redirect all shanta.linuxops.net to linuxops.net somewhere?
<1> otherwise it'll be mod_rewrite, which is a bitch
<2> PolarWolf: mod_rewrite is nice
<0> Lessee...what do you want to accomplish?
<2> or you could use a custom 404 handler using e.g. PHP
<0> OldMonk: You want shanta.linuxops.net to point to just linuxops.net?
<0> OldMonk: That's easy
<1> PolarWolf: if it doesn't interfere with anything else
<3> re
<3> does anybody have ever added a new aix server to an ibm san?
<0> OldMonk: Try now
<0> Flee: IBM Global Services surely has
<1> wow, what did you do?
<0> OldMonk: ServerAlias
<1> ah!
<0> One which was actually in place before I removed it this week
<1> no wonder!
<4> hehe
<0> It was acually *.linuxops.net
<3> PolarWolf: I want to do it my own.. ;)
<1> PolarWolf: why did you remove it?
<0> OldMonk: Issues with other vhosts below that domain
<3> PolarWolf: need only a few hints from someone that has allready done it..
<1> PolarWolf: hmm, let it be then, i'll find another way of doing it in ~raju itself
<0> Flee: It's dead easy, add the WWN of the fiber care in the AIX box to the SAN's zone configuration
<0> Flee: Then let the box doa rescan
<0> OldMonk: Naw, I just added shanta.linuxops.net now, instead of *
<1> ah, cool
<1> thanks
<0> NineVolt: If all else fails I can provide you a jump point
<3> PolarWolf: need to add a new server from the base..
<5> NineVolt: if there are servers behind that router you could just have them redirect visitors
<3> PolarWolf: tell me if theese p***ages are good.
<0> Flee: I know ****all about AIX
<3> PolarWolf: 1) install aix on the new server, 2) make the disks with sanfs and then?
<3> PolarWolf: should i installa volume maknager, other any other software?
<6> meh, and ofcourse my machine doesn't exist according ot HP, so obviosuly I can't connect it to my carepacket..
<7> hrm. very upset. apparently, GF grossed 200 bucks more than the allowed amount to make her a dependent ... ARGHH
<0> Flee: Fukt if I know. I know linux, not AIX
<3> k polar... tnx aniway :)
<0> Flee: Go see what the best practices from IBM say about it
<8> Where the **** is that reality_?
<9> if I have a .tar applicaion that was running on RH7.3 can I untar it and run it on RH9 is the kernel the compatible
<6> reality__: lost grip of reality_?
<8> wlfshmn: aye
<8> It's running in a screen some where
<8> I think it's on silenceisdefeat.org but I can't ssh into there right now because ssh is down
<4> reality__: you can ave revie kill it :P
<8> Not worth it because ssh will eventually be open and I may as well have it running in a screen session seeing as I'm going to be leaving out of town here at like 6:00 tonight
<4> oh well
<10> reality
<8> Nanuq
<11> Linux gohan 2.6.17-10-386 #2 Tue Dec 5 22:26:18 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
<8> you register goatprno instead or goatporn?
<2> its more the volume I'm worried about
<0> Hmm, Evii owns g0atpr0n
<8> Turn down your speakers
<0> Speaking of which...WTF is he?
<10> PolarWolf: in some bay area gutter, prolly
<2> Jostein: hehe, just sent out a couple of SMSes regarding one of them though, it _is_ an election year
<2> so I sent out an SMS to some politically active folks asking if they want to write on the site, :p
<4> w00t
<2> gotta make use of my m***-sms system for something, right?
<4> anyway. ffdshow supports multiple threads, so with max deblocking and deringing in HD-content Im still only using 50% on each core :)
<2> the 1920x thingie?
<2> 120fps, was it?
<4> oh. thats WMV9
<4> I need to find that DVD and test it NOW
<2> hehe
<4> for the record this was "only" 60fps
<2> hehe
<2> btw, in light of the OS on the new laptop, .... interesting first post on your site :)
<4> yeah
<4> but it IS retarded
<7> I've yet to see ffmpeg's codecs outdo xvid
<7> they can in speed, definitely, but not in quality as i've seen
<4> I always use xvid for encoding
<4> but ffmpeg is nice for playback
<7> indeed.
<7> xvid encoding, I get something like 70fps on full dvd resolution to 640x resolution
<7> that's first p***, second p*** is usually around 30fps. xvid doesn't thread well.
<4> I usually get much lower than that, but I go insane on stuff like motion detection
<7> using mencoder of course.
<7> mine is the highest motion detection possible
<4> oh. interesting
<7> mencoder -sws 10 -vf pullup,softskip,crop=720:352:0:66,scale=640:-2 -ofps 24000/1001 -oac copy -ovc xvid -xvidencopts p***=1:bitrate=-373760:vhq=4:min_iquant=1:min_pquant=1:min_bquant=1:threads=1 -o /dev/null -
<7> where bitrate is variable
<7> that's the enc opts string i've come up with over the years
<7> threads I set to 2 not 1
<7> and that's new to the CVS version ...not in older versions of xvid
<4> Im a windows weenie so I usally use DVD2AVI + avisynth + virtualdub
<7> second p*** I do mp3lame audio encoding, which has gotten a bit faster now that It's starting to support amd64 ***embly.
<4> ah
<4> I have sync issues with vbr mp3s which I cant seem to fix
<4> (for encoding, not playback)
<7> ****s for you :)
<4> yeah
<7> i use vbr all the time, never had a problem with mencoder doing it
<4> but I rarely if ever do much encoding though
<8> What's the point of encoding a DVD at 60 fps?
<4> reality__: 60fps encoding SPEED
<7> so you can encode the next one without waiting
<8> Ah
<8> I was going to say, that's about as pointless as upscaling standard cable to HDTV
<4> heh
<7> but yea, decoding has gotten much faster in ffmpeg and such land.. cpu usage for playing an xvid doesn't even register with top anymore
<4> hah! **** me
<8> I encode to x264 usually
<4> this new lappy plays a 1920x1080p, 120fps clip I have :D
<4> only 70% CPU usage on each core
<7> what player is threading it?
<4> this is a WMV9 clip, so Im using standard Windows Media Player (11)
<7> ahh..sorry. . cpu usage doesn't register for vorbis playback anymore..at all.. cpu usage for xvids is at 7% with the pp quality at autoq 6
<4> anyway. on this 1920x1200 panel it looks DAMN nice
<7> Jostein: i've yet to find a nice player / encoder that can do threaded encode/decode. transcode tries to do it, but using transcode blows. on many levels.
<8> Jostein: It helps if you p*** it off to the video card as well
<4> reality__: this is a new lappy with some Nvidia **** in it
<4> I have NO clue on graphic adapters anymore ;)
<8> Jostein: Probably utilizing the GPU of the grpahics card
<4> the graphics registers as 3,2 on the "vista capability" scale
<7> hrm.. I doubt linux land will be very happy with a 1080p xvid or such avi file. You may get away with an mpeg2 at that res, but I doubt otherwise.
<8> safemode: You can do it with Xvmc
<4> still have left to get video working at ALL on my linux laptop
<4> but I havent really even tried yet ;)
<7> reality: xvmc only works for specific video codecs
<7> namely, mpeg2
<4> safemode: its a work laptop. was either that or a localized version of WinXP
<8> And mpeg4
<4> safemode: if I still get pissed at Vista after a week or two, I'll wipe it and just install XP instead
<7> Jostein: yea, but look at your laptop, at how fast it is and such.. now imagine it was faster. that's what using xp would do because it's not wasting half it's ram running the OS
<7> reality: xvmc has never worked on anything but mpeg2s here. whenever you try it on an avi it fails.
<8> safemode: Probably has more to do with your graphics card.
<4> safemode: I have 2GB ram. at boot it eats 800MB, but that IS with Sql Server 2005
<4> safemode: but yeah. this is more a "trying vista out" thing than anything else
<8> There's one patch of the Unichrome driver that will actually support mpeg4 floating around some place.
<7> reality: no, it a thing with ffmpeg. ffmpeg only has one video codec that supports xvmc, and it's the mpeg12 codec
<8> One thing about Vista that's decent is that the Aero interface is p***ed off to the GPU unlike XP
<12> i've utterly given up on windows. :)
<10> reality__: OS X: Been there, done that
<8> Nanuq: Been done in linux as well with Xgl/Aiglx as well
<7> Jostein: I have 2Gb of ram, with everything in my system running , mysql + apache + firefox + thunderbird + xfce4 + gaim + terminals + xcha2 + abiword etc.. i have 500MB (including buffers) in use.
<8> But comparing XP to Vista and ***uming Vista is automatically more a power hog isn't necessarily accurate.
<10> reality__: yeah, but guess which has real apps available :P
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
lelae
What colour is produced by the complete absorption of light rays ?
#windows
#php
#linux
#java
#c++
dkpg centOs
#london
serious53
|
|