| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> It is the best value cut in terms of quality and price.
<1> dogbert2: the small side is fellet
<1> gah
<2> whitecap, I know...but a LARGE thick filet mignon I cannot stand
<0> Unfortunately, restaurants always get the best cuts -- you *rarely* see a really good cut of beef at the grocery store.
<0> Sometimes you can get one if you go to a butcher, or slaughterhouse
<2> bhab, you go to a meat wholesaler to get those kinds of cuts
<0> yup. i'm going to have to find a new butcher when i move *sigh*
<0> moving ****s.
<2> example, you need burger patties in bulk, you go to meat wholesaler (we have several in town)
<3> yo
<3> someone knows where i can find a damn tutorial on how to install xgl under ubuntu
<0> and, given the chance, avoid ground sirloin. You often come up with better ground beef if you get ground trimmings.
<2> bhah, that's what gave me the runs from wed to saturday (undercooked sirloin)
<0> ugh. i'm sorry :( that's such a miserable affliction.
<2> bhab...yeah, no fun at all...poopies returned to normal this morning
<0> good.
<0> man, all this talk about beef makes me want to fire up the grill.
<2> make sure you cook da beef well done...all juices run clear
<4> medium rare 8)
<5> dogbert2: naah, why ruin a good steak:)
<2> Lion-O...that's what I had and as a result got the runs...I asked for medium, but the idiots didn't prepare it right
<0> good cuts of beef should never be cooked past medium.
<2> except ground beef (in any form)
<0> and, when it comes to steaks and whatnot, the most likely source of contamination is surface contamination, so even if the inside is undercooked, you're probably safe
<0> ground beef, on the other hand, should always be cooked medium or above.
<0> (until the internal temperature is 165 degrees F or more).
<2> bhab...do you remember the jack in the box e-coli issue a few years ago...
<2> that was entirely preventable but happened due to undercooked burgers
<6> meh.. I hear some people don't like steak tartar
<0> I do. I think they got that down to a slaughterhouse that had manure contamination in their meat grinders.
<2> bhab, but proper cooking of beef == dead e. coli!
<0> but yes, it is entirely avoidable. critters can't stand the heat :)
<2> I turned in some of the beef to the local health dept on Wed (confirmed e. coli)
<0> e.coli is in a lot of meat. you've probably got a bunch in your lower digestive tract.
<2> bhab, different varieties can make you ill (of e. coli)...
<0> yup, it also depends on where it is, too. It's OK in the lower digestive tract. You don't want it in your upper GI, though.
<2> ayup...
<7> dogbert2: are you still doing the "eating moderately diet" as what your doctor told you, or you have forgotten/ ignored all about that?
<8> <0> and, when it comes to steaks and whatnot, the most likely source of contamination is surface contamination, so even if the inside is undercooked, you're probably safe :actually: cross contaminiation is fairly common two
<2> tsokolat...I only eat like that once a week (of course, over the last 4 days I haven't had much of an appetite)
<0> Becka: yeah, cross-contamination is usually on the surface of the meat, though. e.g. off the grill onto a plate that held raw meat
<2> cross-contamination is usually the culprit in most cases, along with improper cooking
<8> bhab depends
<7> and improper handling
<2> bhab...ayup, which is why you transfer beef that's cooked onto a serving plate (or any clean plate)
<8> i worked with enough dirty bastards to know it not always the case
<0> yeah, dirty people => dirty food
<0> dirty food != good eats. :(
<8> dont look at me i was the trainee :p
<2> yeah, you should always wash up before eating food (or carry antiseptic wipes with you)
<8> doesnt ,atter when you wash up so long as you damn well wash your hands "porpelly"
<0> yeah, running some water over them isn't cleaning them :)
<8> yep soap in there two
<8> and theres even a specific way your supposed to wash them two ~:-/
<0> and scrubbing. in between the fingers and partway up the wrists, too.
<8> yup yup :D
<0> keep fingernails trimmed short, or you have to scrub under those, too.
<8> i know :-/
<9> mod rewrite question. why doesn't this line work in subfolder (works in the mainfolder): RewriteRule ^(.+)/(.+)/(.+).html /seo.php?cat=$1&sub_cat=$2&product=$3 [L]
<4> Dunc: could be anything. From missing html files to non-matching to....
<10> mornin' everyone
<4> Dunc: check the logs.
<11> morning :)
<9> i don't need to at the subfolder name anywhere?
<9> like RewriteRule ^subfolder(.+)/(.+)/(.+).html /subfolder/seo.php?cat=$1&sub_cat=$2&product=$3 [L]
<4> Dunc: if you need to ask then I guess I know why it didn't work: you have no idea what you're doing. RTFM comes to mind.
<9> i been study the manual, but it's very complex
<4> still; the logfile is the place to look.
<4> it could even be an issue where the "sub redirect" worked and redirected to the main directory where the other redirect took over. Too many options to begin with.
<12> meep!
<2> m00
<13> Does anyone have any ideas of what happened at the Bat Hat conference on Vista?
<10> Ahh.. that's better
<4> Digi: wrong channel I'd say.
<10> mornin' everyone
<14> Does anyone care?
<4> ThomasJ: mornin'!
<13> Bat = Black ...sorry No I wonder what my Liux brother thought.
<10> heh.. fergot I had launched bx as root yesterday.. got banned last time..
<4> Digi: "you're an idiot". Thats what. Take your stupidity someplace else.
<13> Wow - My keyboard is a mess. I need to replace this in the morning.
<10> been years since I ran nix.. :( such a slacker I am..
<10> So, how's everyone this fine morning?
<13> Lion-o Thanks the kind invitation. I will take your suggestion. Have a wonder day.
<13> ThomasJ After that comment from Lion-o, Making me wonder.
<10> Lion-O: G'd morning.. :D
<10> heh.. nice HellHound
<10> Anyone tried Slax yet?
<14> Is there some reason to?
<10> I normally, well when I was running nix, am a slackware user
<10> Just to try it I suppose mwilson
<14> And you're asking for sympathy?
<10> lol mwilson, slackware is a good dis
<4> good for playing about perhaps.
<4> totally unsuited for any serious work though.
<10> Though, since I've never tried any other distros, I have nothing to compare it too
<10> Oh Lion-O? Why so?
<10> I mean, if that's not a too vague a question to ask
<4> Slackware doesn't check dependencies on packages, it doesn't install security/bugfix patches and it can't be decently maintained. Upgrading in Slackware isn't upgrading: basicly you're tearing apart your system by removing software after which you try to fix things by installing newer versions of the stuff you removed. Whatever crap breaks during that process will always remain a mystery untill the **** starts hitting the fan.
<4> thats basicly the major problem. lackware aka a copy of Volkerding's harddisk.
<10> wow.. lol.. that surely seems to "hit the nail on the head" since I've been using it..
<10> Always such a pain in the arse to get ANYTHING working
<10> and when it breaks.. it's broken pretty good
<10> I'm on Slax right now.. cause I don't have a hard disk for this machine.. pretty neat for now
<10> I've never tried any distro'
<10> s with say a debian core or anything like that
<10> Just so used to Slackware.. I guess I feel "safe" in it's environment
<15> All the more power to you
<10> I suppose I could revert to my first ever distro of Mandrake.. though it's so bloated(or "robust"), I suppose I might as well run win
<15> ThomasJ: What's your point anyway?
<10> Hmph.. well.. I am just wondering what a better distro might be I reckon.. But a question like that is rarely going to yield a "good" answer.. since there are so many different nix distro's, it's all opinion based
<15> ThomasJ: You got that right :)
<15> ThomasJ: The consensus around here seems to be that Debian, or a derivative thereof is generally the distribution of choice for multi/general purpose use
<4> That and the issue of the task it needs to do. So in the end you get SuSE for your workstation and Solaris for your server, backed up by some BSD boxes. All the rest can go in a vmware server environment 8)
<15> Lion-O: Lessee, strip away the BSD and Solaris components, and you'll be about right :0
<10> Hmm.. I know there is a live debian distro out there.. maybe I will download one and check it out.. Thank you Polar and Lion
<4> the vmware server runs on Debian 8)
<15> ThomasJ: Most live CDs are debian based, actually
<15> Except for that PoS you're running now
<10> PolarWolf: I ***umed it didn't much matter since I run only in console mode anyways
<10> I don'
<10> t run 'X'
<10> (Sorry for the multi-lnes, new keyboard and I'm not used to it yet)
<15> ThomasJ: Usually it doesn't really matter much, indeed. Until you need specific things. And it has little to nothing to do with whether or not you're running X
<15> ThomasJ: The most immediate difference you'll notice is when you want to install additional software
<10> OIC.. I don't really "know" enough to be a serious nix user.. I truely enjoy using it.. though 99% of the time I am in one of my win boxes..
<15> ThomasJ: And...?
<15> ThomasJ: It's not like that makes you in any way special. You're amongst the majority of people "doing" linux.
<15> Though only the top end would actually "enjoy" using it, I guess :)
<10> Well.. I, unfortunately, don't really have the time to devote to learning a new core.. :( i.e. the Debian core, I didn't realize that Slackware wasn't as "good" a distro as others out there..
<15> Most just try it because it came on a CD with a magazine
<15> ThomasJ: "Good" is all a matter of opinion and depends greatly on what you're looking for
<15> ThomasJ: Besides, it's not so much as learning a new "core", but more being aware of certain implementation details
<15> ThomasJ: e.g. Debian makes your life easy, Slackware makes your life hard. You get to choose which to prefer.
<4> actually... Debian gives you a choice in the matter, lack doesn't.
<10> PolarWolf : Gotya.. so it's not that slackware is "bad", it's just more difficult?
<15> Lion-O: Kinda depends on the definition of "easy" and "hard" :)
<4> You can use Debian's package manager to install stuff but you don't have to. You can use pre-made packages but also easily re-compile them.
<15> ThomasJ: Oh, it's bad alright :) Just not by the definition of "bad" most people use
<15> ThomasJ: And from a user space point of view it's not any more or less difficult than any other random distribution out there
<15> Until you try to e.g. install anything more complex than a single binary console based program
<10> I see... I always though that all nix distro's were equally a "pain in the ***" to manage.. like you said, install something complex..
<15> And the "engine", or "core" as you like to call it, is pretty much the same too
<15> ThomasJ: Installing anything comples is for me only a single command away
<15> s/comples/complex/
<15> Well, for 80% of cases anyway
<15> The remaining 20% is stuff no sane person would be doing anyway, so that's ok
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#MissKitten
#mirc
#AllNiteCafe
#apache
#c++
#chatzone
#java
#AllNiteCafe
Tomcat DEACTIVATED xampp
#php
|
|