| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> anyone in a ****ty enough mood this morning to call the above "op impersonation"? :D
<1> D-side: you mean Coma didn't went for a holiday to South Africa?
<2> no :D
<3> hum, what op impersonation?
<3> ah, bah. anyone that confuses that guy with an op deserves what's coming to them ;)
<3> especially with the original present ;)
<0> just trying to gauge the cumulative mood around here.
<2> hah
<2> /mode D-side +bs :P
<4> how do i reset all internet connections for a local ip ?
<1> what do you mean with "reset" ? Normally you don't.
<4> well.. close connections
<1> setup a firewall. "man iptables"
<5> are you talking about shutting down internet?
<4> i don't want it permanently..
<4> just for a moment
<1> dudex: good for you. "man iptables".
<6> how about taking the interface down?
<1> Shadur: its possible but I get the impression that he wants to block 1 node on a lan.
<0> i really must hate myself today
<0> i just had burger king for breakfast.
<1> eew ;)
<7> http://www.comics.com/comics/dilbert/archive/images/dilbert2006081526805.gif <-- no trolls!
<5> has any one used dkfilter
<7> the postfix thing?
<0> i had their breakfast food, not actual burgers.
<0> that'd be awful right now
<7> near 3pm here in the uk
<7> If it is the postfix thing, its still in beta, and relies on Domain Keys (which nobody in the Real World uses)
<7> except yahoo! of course :)
<8>
<7> whats to lean? generic placemarker for styles :)
<5> yea
<5> dkfilter is not signing the meail mesage
<5> email message
<9> reminds me washing to dry
<10> tsokolat: good morning
<11> g'mornin whitecap
<11> whitecap: you're up early
<10> tsokolat: nah, actually slept in a hour or so, usual get-up is 5:30
<11> my get up now is 6:45, such a bonus..:)
<10> tsokolat: bonus includes nice long days at the office to. iirc
<11> good for you. i can't do that
<10> tsokolat: no. i have stable 8 hr. days. i thought i saw you saying you were putting in long days ?
<11> whitecap: well, yeah. i mean bonus for me to at least get up at 6:30 instead of a usual 5:30, but then putting long days defies that.
<11> whitecap: i can't win.. =p
<11> whitecap: the weekend early morning is my NYTimes news reading, also hoping that Cheeksy would be here anytime so, she can read this. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/us/06marry.html?th&emc=th
<11> a somehow interesting article.
<10> long article
<11> i have patience.. =p
<10> interesting. it does seem like a lot of younger people are delaying or avoiding marriage
<12> whitecap: They are
<1> not very unlogical IMO
<12> whitecap: And it's not a sole american "problem" either
<12> I do think it has something to do with the generation though
<13> hey normally i would ask such a stupid question here but #linuxhelp is locked, i'm just coming back to linux after a long hiatus and cannot remember how to edit my program menus in Gnome :( sorry for the overly dumb question this early in the morning
<7> there is little point - all the financial benefits of marrage (other than giving the partner rights in a will or divorce) are gone now, and the religious angle only matters if you are religious
<12> The marrying generation has seen too many marriages go bust, namely their parents', to believe in the concept of "until death do us part"
<7> "until divorce court does us pauper"
<12> and leave us bankrupt
<12> It's simply too much h***le to bother with
<7> the girls love it though
<1> that and the whole financial issues
<7> I am sure they could do just as well without the actual marrage - just the big ceremony where they get to show off a dress costing half your yearly income, then a big party and a holiday...
<13> tax benefits for married couples = guarunteed tax revenues for the government over at least 1 more generation ;)
<12> DaveHowe: Yeah, well, I don't think it's a gender thing either
<7> PolarWolf: in my case it is. I don't want to be a public spectacle, spend half my yearly income on clothing I get to wear once, go to a big party where people make speeches dragging up long forgotten embarr***ments, or go on a holiday where I am supposed to dance attendence on my partner instead of getting out and enjoying the holiday...
<12> The government will simply have to accomodate a whole generation of singles or, how to put this, "contractually engaged" couples
<12> DaveHowe: I don't see myself get married either, to be honest
<13> PolarWolf: one of the many reasons they don't want Contractually engaged same *** couples... they do not create new tax revenues :)
<7> PolarWolf: I probably will, if becky wants it enough
<12> TheZuule: They'll manage to get around that somehow when confronted with reality
<13> PolarWolf: nah the US government doesn't deal in reality lol
<12> TheZuule: To be honest, I don't take the US and its government into account much
<13> PolarWolf: you're much better off that way me thinks
<12> TheZuule: There's a whole world outside the US, yaknow
<13> PolarWolf: and i've been fortunate in life to see a lot of it, gets harder to come home every time
<7> PolarWolf: yeah, but its full of terrorists - the Shrub says so :)
<12> DaveHowe: *shrug* if the outside world is so dangerous, there's nothing preventing him not to bother with it at all :)
<13> PolarWolf: been to london, france, bermuda, jamaica, most of the caribean, all of it much nicer than my homeland ;(
<12> TheZuule: Yeah, well, you're supposed to live in a democracy, go fix
<7> PolarWolf: there is a school of thought that says if the americans would stop poking fingers into other countries administrations to protect the financial interests of their companies, it wouldnt *be* such a dangerous place
<13> PolarWolf: my brothers and sisters are scared and unwilling, they've been feared into a corner, this whole thing is getting ready to pop though, i hope to see it before i die
<13> Vi Veri Vniversum Vivus Vici - by the force of truth, i, while living, have conquered the universe
<13> anyone know if #linuxhelp got hijacked?
<14> What would give you the idea that it had?
<7> TheZuule: last I looked it was set +r
<13> there were some kiddies in there yesterday causing trouble, now it's +r
<12> DaveHowe: Who knows. Water under the bridge, we live in the here and now.
<14> Oh... and +r must automagically mean that it got hijacked.
<7> TheZuule: +r isn't "locked" its "restricted" - as long as you have a
<7> -n account with services, you can get in
<13> ahhhh
<13> yeah i don't register for stuff ;)
<7> there you go then
<13> just haven't been able to figure out how to edit my menus in gnome ;( the usual response is "use fluxbox" or "X is for nubs"
<7> I use KDE, mostly - so sorry, dunno
<13> yeah KDE is easy you just right click on the big K and hit Menu Editor, gnome doesn't have anything like that though as far as i can see
<15> http://www.gnome.org/start/2.0/menuediting.html
<14> Why in the world would "use fluxbox" be an adequate response to that? Sounds like a cluebie.
<14> <GULP>
<16> sheesh...bigger appetite than HH
<14> What, no grape jelly?
<13> smsie: awesome thank you!
<14> <GLUG><GLUG><GLUG>
<16> sheesh, whatta breakfast
<16> heh...8oz of NY steak is gone in an instant
<16> that should be enuf to keep the mutt busy for an hour or so
<16> damn, he ate the whole steak...what gluttony
<1> .who
<1> whoops :P
<16> egad...a drunk HH
<1> dogbert2: now you've done it
<16> done what, HH didn't hafta drink the beer
<17> wow, beer this early in the morning? what a lush! :)
<16> rotfl
<2> I should learn C++ and just make mod_rewrite as an ISAPI filter for IIS...
<0> i cant even contemplate a 72oz porterhouse
<16> D-side, why not? :)
<17> ...or you could run apache on windows :)
<0> dogbert2: thtas just stupidly large
<16> D-side, but very tasty!
<16> 4.5lbs of beef :)
<17> that, and for those large cuts of meat like that, they usually have a large bone and a bunch of fat/gristle that isn't good eats
<17> so you end up with a so-so piece of meat with a bunch of stuff you're not going to eat anyways
<17> i'd rather have a smaller, better cut of meat.
<16> bhab, not quite...a porterhouse is a good cut of beef
<17> wrong. A porterhouse *can* be a good cut of beef.
<16> well, yeah, anyone can mess up a cut of beef if it's undercooked or overcooked :)
<17> Just like anything, butchering is relative to both where the meat was harvested from the animal, and the quality of that cut
<10> porter house has a fine cut on one side abd even finer cot on the other side of a small bone
<10> hmm
<17> It is the best value cut in terms of quality and price.
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#php
#slice
emech cygwin
#java
what language is frumoasa
#linuxhelp
insib tfajla
#AllNiteCafe
#MissKitten
2 nite
|
|
