| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Comments:
<0> I can't watch action shows/movies.
<0> the bull****'s too thick.
<1> well, not *here*, but where i moved here from
<2> siglite: can you watch pr0n?
<1> pontoon boat upside down in the middle of the cemetery
<0> schitzo: bbkf doesn't let me.
<2> siglite: that ****s.
<3> siglite: get out
<3> really?
<0> yeah, she frowns on it. I respect that.
<3> OH it all makes sense
<3> shes in the damn channel
<3> saynomore
<1> hmm, ipcop box at $library **** itself again
<0> plus
<0> I really have this philosophy about pr0n
<1> D-side: hahaha
<0> if I can't **** it, I don't wanna see it nekkid.
<3> jgaddis: ipcop really is a piece of ****
<0> it's the same reason I never got into tittie bars.
<1> D-side: this box has ran fine for 5 months straight without so much as a reboot, then it kernel panic'd last thursday and again today
<3> jgaddis: its still a piece of ****.
<1> keith is so full of **** i can smell him over here
<3> heh
<4> somebody say tittie bars?
<0> nope
<0> seriously, why look at pr0n? Why look at some chick nekkid you can't ****?
<1> D-side: If it's stupid but it works, it's not stupid.
<1> That's my philosophy.
<0> and tittie bars are even worse
<1> siglite: cause i can look at her, then come in here and **** my ol' lady
<1> lindsey likes lesbian pr0n
<0> why PAY to give YOURSELF blueballs?
<0> well
<1> i don't mind watching it with her
<0> bbkf likes lesbo pr0n
<0> sometimes.
<0> have to catch her in the mood.
<3> siglite: they ALL do.
<0> it's rare though.
<3> every last damn one of them
<5> lol
<4> jgaddis: o_O your woman likes lespr0n? whoa.
<1> Ka-bar: Yeah, makes sense, since she does chicks too
<5> Ka-bar, I think it's collection that attracted her in the first place.. :)
<0> somebody drag out the quote...
<4> whoa. you lucky ****ing dog, you.
<3> about the clippers?
<0> http://quotes.linuxops.net/index.php?op=view&id=165
<1> so i wonder wtf is wrong with this ipcop box all of a sudden
<3> oh that one
<1> siglite: heh
<0> see, I'm actually allowed to go look for chicks.
<4> haha
<0> but I have to bring them home to HER.
<1> siglite: I can, if they're for her
<1> yeah
<5> siglite, what a delemia ! :)
<0> and they have to be *HOT*
<1> my life ****s
<1> hahahah ****in' not!
<6> jgaddis! siglite! Emerson! etc!
<5> hey ksh
<3> bring one home, get them both doped up, wait til they p*** out... its a party!
<7> hmmm lsof does not list the NFS exported directories
<7> is this expected?
<0> the problem is, that I have this concept that my wife does not.
<0> the concept is "threesome hot"
<6> talking about siglite's wife's lesbo tendancies again, I see
<3> oh, yes. yes i understand.
<1> heh
<0> that's a chick who's not quite hot enough to ****... but to fill in a threesome, she'd do.
<0> the wife doesn't grok this concept. The third has to be smokin' hot to be in consideration.
<8> heloo :>
<6> heh
<3> well she just needs to have more reasonable expectations
<0> she doesn't.
<0> dude, women are more critical than we are.
<3> i mean lets face it, the kind of girl who's willing to go home to a man and his wife, well
<3> shes what we call a hoo-er
<1> hahaha
<3> they dont tend to be all that great.
<0> D-side: yeah, there's that too.
<5> lol
<0> D-side: it's a bit of a catch-22.
<4> Eugen-On: we're having a serious discussion about lesbian *** here right now. Linux questions will HAVE to wait!
<1> o/~ i know it dad, ain't she cool!? them's the kind i dig o/~
<0> though, the wife does wear lesbo gear to school, so maybe she'll find some hottie and bring her home herself.
<3> siglite: and thus the reason this plays out only in your mind, and not in your bedroom
<9> siglite: women are more critical than we are? That explains my problem ...
<0> D-side: oh, it's played out in the bedroom.
<3> with three people?
<0> yeah
<0> and lemme tell you, I got a lifetime of mental spank images out of that one.
<3> no wonder porn doesnt flip your skirt you lucky bag of ****
<1> heh, i got video and still pics
<5> lol
<1> but i dont watch it much
<0> I'm so not allowed to film.
<1> surprisingly, cause i thought i would
<0> like, under threat of death.
<3> siglite: no ****. you cant ****ing blame her
<0> and not like some idle half joking threat of death.
<1> i wonder if i can do failover w/ two ipcop boxes
<3> siglite: yeah i know. theres a great reason for that
<3> people like that
<0> a "listen to me very carefully. If you film this, I will shoot you in the ****ing head. Clear?"
<5> lol
<1> D-side: i've never showed anything that she didn't say i could
<9> jgaddis: I could do failover with two boxes.
<3> jgaddis: give up on that **** and just use openbsd w/ carp
<9> siglite: bugger :(
<3> i've never seen a firewall failover solution for linux worth a ****
<0> I have.
<0> but it's commercial.
<0> it's called stonegate.
<3> jgaddis: yeah, sorry. you're right.
<3> siglite: i meant specifically non-comm
<1> yeah, i'm trying to avoid commercial ****... any money i can save 'em goes to me =)
<0> and not only is it commercial, but it's ****ing expensive as hell. But you can build some seriously bad-*** firewall clusters with it.
<3> i think astaro will do it too.
<1> if it weren't for that, i'd just throw a nokia in there
<0> jgaddis: just go the cold spare route
<0> or even hot spare route.
<1> siglite: well, i would, but there's no "technical" type people on site through the day
<2> jgaddis: what were you asking about mysql ****?
<3> obsd, carp, pfsync
<3> what could be easier
<1> schitzo: i wanna do failover between two boxes, without shared storage, and not using the master/slave replication **** (since it's only one-way)
<1> D-side: a web interface so somebody else can manage it besides me
<1> hence, ipcop
<3> well ****, yeah with those criteria you're ****ed.
<1> i need to figure out why this box is ****in' up.
<2> jgaddis: the network cluster stuff works pretty well. Just make sure you do rolling backups if you must have it
<1> thing is, it's running the whole time and (somewhat) responsive at the console... just no traffic is being p***ed.
<1> schitzo: yeah, but they're talking like four boxes, minimum, for that
<2> jgaddis: three really
<1> i'll probably just give up and do the replication bit
<2> jgaddis: how many machines you talking? just two?
<1> schitzo: preferably
<2> jgaddis: what are you trying to do? real RDBMS stuff?
<0> ok, this hurts
<0> a lot
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
deviantnet
#linux
definition of f(x+h)-f(x)/h
#linux
#php
xghari
#mysql
#AllNiteCafe
#AllNiteCafe
2qqqqqqqqqqq
|
|