| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Comments:
<0> seriously, how can kissing not be "physical" or "intimate"? Do you just not know how to kiss? :P
<1> cheeksy: don't kiss him then, give him a BJ to make his wife rich and powerful
<2> duh i was merely asking for other opinions to support my NEGATIVE reaction to what my friend said :o)
<0> cheeksy: ahhh, you were playing devil's advocate.
<1> cheeksy: ...and your friend considers the opinions of the bunch of jack***es in #linux the definitive answer?
<0> cheeksy: tell your "friend" that it depends, but ***** lips are right out?
<2> OldMonk: i just wonder what other males think.
<2> cause it isnt the first time i hear from a guy that kissing or blowjob isnt cheating.
<3> is there any tool that permits you the movement of an account from one box to another? incl. mail acct with user&p*** and content, mysql db and so on?
<2> OldMonk: as jack*** as you are, i think you wouldnt like your woman going around kissing other men :o)
<1> cheeksy: my women are PAID to go around kissing other men. and not just kissing too!
<2> OldMonk: i am not talking about whores!!!
<1> they're not whores -- they're ladies of negotiable affection
<0> oh, wait, wait
<0> cheeksy
<0> your friend is a *guy*?
<0> cheeksy: of *course* he doesn't know what cheating is. He's a guy for crying out loud.
<2> szymon: i have male friends.
<2> szymon: so... you are a ... woman? since you know?
<2> duh
<0> cheeksy: guys will use any excuse to justify something to themselves, just to let them enjoy themselves
<2> szymon: so will women.
<1> i think rules are different for men and women
<2> i think rules are the same.
<2> if a man goes around kissing - its not cheating. but if a woman does the same - it is.
<1> guys by guys are polygamous by nature, so they cannot bne unfaithful
<4> cheeksy: .. and this is exactly why problems occur ,;)
<0> cheeksy: no, women *know* when they're cheating. They just choose to do it anyway. But men have a special ability to convince themselves that they're in the right.
<1> women, OTOH, must stick to one huy
<1> er, one guy
<2> szymon: oh dear. you still havent learnt about women's ability to convince themselves and everyone around???
<2> OldMonk: human being isnt polygamic by nature
<1> cheeksy: sure they are
<2> if you say men are polygamic - it applies to women as well
<1> men are
<2> only in human world female species develop attachments to the males they are with.
<0> cheeksy: no, women are very different beasts. Believe me, they *know* when they are cheating, they just choose to do it anyway. Those lying bitches.
<2> szymon: i love it when you call me THAT :o)
<1> cheeksy: well, no, for a couple of reasons: 1. women can't have multiple wives (generally) and 2. it's follows from the origin of the species that women have to stick to one person
<0> cheeksy: let's take it to /msg! :P
<2> szymon: what about all pulic affection!!!
<2> OldMonk: it wasnt like that in ancient times when men and women were living in caves
<1> as a man, i can theoretically fertilise 1 million women or more with each ejaculation, so my objective in life is to spread my genes as far and wide as possible
<2> OldMonk: as a man, you can also be good for nothing
<2> oh boy.
<4> OldMonk: that would be one hell of an artificial insemination project ,)
<1> a woman, OTOH, can p*** her genes onto a max of, say, 400 offspring, so she has to be damn careful of whom she gets ****ed by
<2> it was a simple question about kissing and cheating. lol
<1> hence men have to range far and wide, it's a biological imperative
<2> ...and thats how the blowup dolls were created...
<1> wlfshmn: i was leaving the pregnant periods out. if you include those it's more like 35 offspring
<2> welshy: he is talking about eggs, not actually pregnancy
<0> OldMonk: how the ****** would you split a single ejactulation to a million women? I mean think of the logistics involved!
<1> szymon: that's not the point
<2> szymon: sperm bank!
<1> however, you have just given me an idea for a wonderful new machine
<0> rofl
<4> cheeksy: I suspect you generall get more than a single sperm when you withdraw from a sperm bank ;)
<2> OldMonk: japanese must have made it already
<1> wlfshmn: depends on the size of the cheque you wrote, doesn't it?
<1> ``i have a cunning plan''
<4> OldMonk: I suppose. Better be one damn good swimmer with unmatched navigational skills though ;)
<1> wlfshmn: hmm, pool full of ovulating women... now that's an idea
<2> oh its like that movie where the guy was paid to impregnante the lesbians
<2> impregnate*
<2> he ended up being a papa to 19 kids and made almost 200,000 USD
<4> OldMonk: Ok then you need to get ones that are clorine-resistant too ;)
<1> wlfshmn: ****, chlorine kills them?
<4> OldMonk: they aren't exactly built for mixed environments ;)
<4> OldMonk: that extra meter of swimming if also probably the equivlent of half a world apart ;)
<4> OldMonk: lots and lots of -really- small EVA suits
<1> bwaahaa!
<4> OldMonk: I think nanotechnology holds great promise. ;)
<1> wlfshmn: so, you looking to change your job? :)
<4> OldMonk: someone has to program the damn things, and if it's going to take over the world, it's gonna run Java. ,)
<1> gpl sperm!
<4> thats another way to get your markup propagated I suppose ;)
<4> Oldmonk: think we scared off cheeksy yet?
<1> wlfshmn: nah, she's a persistent bugger
<1> thought the combination of geekiness and ***ism may succeed in the long term
<0> OldMonk: isn't she a ***ist geek though? :P
<4> szymon: wannabe geek really
<4> szymon: more of a hangaround
<1> wannabe ***ist too?
<4> OldMonk: nah, let's leave her -something-
<4> libolt4: I only have one up at a time ,)
<4> libolt4: my poor linux box has... 17 domino server installations ,)
<5> hello
<6> Ohh, 8 miles is a mere stroll.
<6> Argh
<4> Coma: this whol mult-channle thing gets confusing eh ;)
<6> Only a little ;)
<6> I'm trying to save a little screen estate with having multiple channels in a single window, but that takes some getting used to ;)
<6> OldMonk: irssi, in case you were wondering ;)
<7> I don't even understand how you save any space on it
<1> Coma: ah, i've been using multiple windows in irssi in the same xterm for ages
<1> or xterm equivalent
<6> OldMonk: Oh, I use multiple windows too, but also multiple channels per window
<1> Coma: that ****s
<6> Yeah, but it saves space ;)
<7> How does it "save space"? I don't get that.
<1> Coma: er, how does it save screen real estate?
<7> Won't the combined 2-channel window be as big as a 1-channel one?
<6> OldMonk: Because I don't have to open more windows to see the same amount of channels
<1> Coma: er, something wrong somewhere
<6> Oh, probably
<7> I just switch to channels when there's activity :)
<6> What if both channels have activity?
<7> Switch to one, read whatever is happening there, then switch to the other.
<6> But this way I can read both at the same time :)
<7> :)
<7> Well, I can only read one at a time anyway
<8> can anyone help me?
<7> #Linuxhelp
<4> Demonen: I do that too. leaves me thuroughly confused ;)
<7> wlfshmn: That's the natural state of things
<8> can anyone help me on printers?
<8> some questions to ask
<1> later
<5> does anyone have experience in configuring a rfc 2684 dsl connection? Or maybe some documentation on how to configure this...
<5> I googled, but didn't find anything good
<9> Demonen: haha, a very clueless ban in #perl :)
<7> cyberpunk: God damn it. That's just silly.
<7> Probably "crack"
<9> Demonen: there's no reason for me to set up those strict rules like that.
<7> I think it's just silly.
<7> #Perl is a god damned minefield
<7> Helping with CGI is not what the channel is for, that's allright, but naming indian tribes will get you banned.
<6> #perl lacks a sense of humour
<6> Even worse than #linux
<7> Coma: It's got an automatic badword ban script with a gazillion words in it
<9> Demonen: webserver, apache, cgi...
<9> a couple of words.
<7> cyberpunk: I accidentally asked if anyone knew of a good and fast module for parsing apache logs
<7> KAZAM, out!
<7> All I wanted was help in cracking a really tough (to me, anyway) problem.
<9> haha, that's childish nonsense to ban people therefore.
<7> cyberpunk: but I said "apache", so I must be looking for CGI help, and I should go to #CGI for that.
<7> What if I said "commandline" in #CGI and got banned? How silly is that?
<9> haha, that's insane.
<6> What a load of crap
<7> Or if I say "windows" in here. Ofcourse I must be talking about the OS, and could not possibly be talking about windows in the real world, or even windows on my Linux desktop.
<7> Anyway, </rant>
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#AllNiteCafe
#AllNiteCafe
#linux
#AllNiteCafe
double int divided by double
kfc the only thing missing is u
arag rega
dfghfk
non-mechanical sport achieves the highest speed
#teens
|
|