| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Comments:
<0> that is it
<0> toffie: php creates the files as 600
<0> toffie: i have the same problem
<0> toffi: cron will be better than nothing
<1> huh? ^o)
<0> toffie:i use debian sarge
<0> updated
<2> orc__: if both ISPs use BGP, I'd use that instead of OSPF
<0> nope
<0> Ka-bar: one link is adsl pppoe-client with gre quagga ospf
<0> bgp does not work with tunnel
<3> In the topic what do you mean by: [ 2.6.16.1 / 2.6.16-git20]
<3> ?
<3> the latest kernels?
<0> the bgp routes received from a tunnel are inactive
<0> but maybe i am wrong
<2> uh, that well could be, if the ISP is sending the wrong BGP advertisements
<3> anyone?
<2> Nakhle: anyone isn't here right now. He left.
<4> anyone seen jfl lately?
<0> Ka-bar: between main office and branch there is an adsl link between two pppoe-client quagga gre ospf bgp machines
<0> Ka-bar: i am advertising all the routes
<0> ospf is ok
<0> but bot bgp
<0> not
<4> they're two different things.
<4> and bgp routes are bgp routes. Coming from a tunnel has nothing to do with it.
<0> this adsl link would be the failover link but the main link is ghsdl link and i can not get ospf from the ghdsl modem/router
<1> orc__ ok, but when I was runnin debian sarge it was no problem =/
<0> siglite: the bgp routes are coming but they are signed inactive
<0> siglite: so the machine does not use them
<0> siglite:but ospf routes are ok the are working
<0> siglite: i can not get ospf from the other main line so i decided to use ping to find the failover and change the default gw
<0> is there an already script or program for it
<4> sounds like a bgp misconfiguration. Dunno why it'd be marking the routes as inactive.
<4> I'm not a bgp or ospf guru by any stretch of the imagination.
<4> you might find a few of them in #ciscohelp though
<2> Yeah, I'd go complain to the ISP before I started writing scripts which may or may not work and which may or may not cause additional problems.
<4> or at least talk to the ISP
<4> make sure you're not announcing bogus routes to them
<4> bogus or conflicting
<2> If the ISP is giving you useless routing information. . .
<0> siglite:BGP would avoid tunnels
<2> d8: what are you doing?
<0> if i do not use bgp or ospf i want this failover with ping to find the dead link and change the default gw
<2> orc__: have you tried google?
<0> i am looking for an already written program for it
<0> yes
<2> orc__: and have you looked at lartc.org?
<0> yes
<2> well, I don't have a program for you.
<2> and I kinda doubt that anyone else here does either.
<0> http://www.pcquest.com/content/linux/103091901.asp
<0> here it is but i did not like it
<0> and the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ route/gc_timeout thing with two default gw
<0> but it is useless
<2> http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
<0> oo
<0> this is not a failover
<0> but thanks
<0> http://www.linuxquestions.org/linux/blog/ALInux/2006-02-12/Failover_script_for_Connection_back_up this can be maybe
<5> orc__: i suggest you take you lazy *** somewhere elese
<5> s/elese/else
<0> i am already abused by ospf and bgp :)
<5> orc__: wedontcare(tm)
<0> tavi-san: this is enough
<0> tavi-san: talk for your self
<5> orc__: just buzz off dude, Ka-bar tried to help and you just keep trolling
<0> tavi-san: i am doing it for others
<5> orc__: wedontcare(tm)
<0> tavi-san:maybe some gets help with this discussion and the given info
<0> tavi-san:if you say so i dont care u
<6> if you had read kabar's link, you'd have seen the kernel patches at the bottom that let the kernel do dead gateway detection and failover, plus the link from THAT page to a howto on setting it all up
<5> orc__: i scrolled up, people tried to help you, and you just kept on trolling
<0> RelDrgn: this patch is for only the dead link
<6> you've been given plenty of information but the most you've given back is "thats not it"
<7> smsie: FFS how would I know where you could park your bike? :)
<0> it is not for the link for the one behind the cisco at the provider side
<6> orc__: so wait, your problem is that the provider ****s ***, and you're trying to fix this at your end?
<0> RelDragon:i mean phsical ethernet link
<0> i know that nano.txt
<8> Tron: your discriminating against us bike rides. Thats ok, I'll suggest smsie to park it on YOUR parkingspace!
<8> mwua ha ha ha
<8> s/rides/riders/
<5> Lion-O: hi :D, please send Jostein some coffee he is angry im kicking his *** at yahtzee :)_
<8> tavi-san: HA HA HA
<8> tavi-san++
<6> orc__: well, good luck with whatever you're doing, I don't see how pinging the gateway will tell you anything that the dead gateway patch would not tell you
<5> Lion-O: *giggle*
<0> RelDrgn: i am not pinging the gateway i am pinging a rmote computer
<7> Lion-O: Bah. smsie and I are texting each other for tonight's LONIX meet in London and he's asking me where he can park his bike and I have NFI. :P
<6> thats not what you said ;)
<9> tavi-san: Im writing the -proper- yahtzeebot now
<9> tavi-san: cant concentrate on silly things like th actual game :P
<5> Jostein: yeah right, and my name is rudolph and i have a red nose
<9> heh
<9> tavi-san: EvilBot can though :P
<5> ./oper tavi josteinfwapping
<5> damn doesnt work
<7> What's the usual cause of "Max sendQ exceeded" quit messages?
<10> bad client?
<7> No one knows. *googles*
<10> someone probably knows. they are just ignoring you
<7> "Max sendq exceeded is when the server is flooding the client, not the other way around."
<10> bad sever
<10> er server
<3> are init's for modems important in their configurations?
<7> Sendq (Send queue) is the amount of data that is allowed to be pending (or stored) by the server. Each server has
<7> a set limit of data allowed to be queued for each user or client. This is done to ***ure that the server's resources
<7> are distributed equally amongst all users. This quit message is fairly rare, and is often caused by network or
<7> internet problems that prevent data from reaching a user. People with slow Internet connections may get disconnected
<7> this way when requesting a large amount of data from the server.
<8> Tron: I do. On YOUR parking space :)
<11> fairly rare eh?
<3> anyone?
<11> Tron: aiming for a battleship?
<10> Tron: so either he's on really **** dialup. Or he's doing something stupid like /list
<7> D-side: BOOM!
<11> all that work for $5?
<11> jeez.
<10> heh. I don't keep any money in my wallet.
<11> i rarely do also
<5> im .ro, i always have money on me
<7> Is .ro money worth anything? :P *ducks*
<2> lol
<10> oh I have money on me. just not in my wallet.
<12> Tron: in the meanwhile it became quite stable.. 1 EUR = 3 RON
<7> schitzo: Just as long as you didn't say "in" you.
<12> Tron: compared with last year when 1 EUR was ~30.000
<7> yoz: Ah okay.
<10> jgaddis: does lunch include teh chixor?
<10> Tron: no, that's the drugs that I mule across the border.
<7> Echelon ?
<11> you know. The NSA
<11> They're watching, you know.
<7> Ah. okay.#
<2> D-side: ?
<2> SSG?
<11> no
<11> but Echelon is probably what caught that prick. :D
<10> whatever happened to SSG?
<7> SSG?
<13> probably got taken away by the feds, like he kept bitching about.
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
tomcat mydsl
#skype
#AllNiteCafe
couching up green phlegm
who is easypwn
#squid
c:set access variable within scriptlet
#linux
#mirc
#chatzone
|
|