| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Comments:
<0> so you'd probably need 48 to be marked at the 45 limit
<1> and using a data flood program, my server crashes and gives this message:
<1> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0xbe9d8c60 ******
<0> but the ticket is the same from 45 to 49
<2> Javatr: in short: your "question" makes no sense what so ever and cannot be answered.
<2> data flood?
<2> Javatr: I think its time for you to leave now, goodbye.
<3> whyzzyrd, cat hurt. limping badly. shoulder swollen.
<1> : /
<1> i dont know exactly what it is.
<0> Javatr: OOo?
<4> !seen joanito
<0> http://www.kfwebs.net/news/121/MALLOC_CHECK_
<5> !seen *****
<0> okay, if he don't want the help..
<6> didn't realize how much i missed college parties
<5> just cheching, that's all :P
<2> lol
<7> Lion-O: Oh... Hey... I'm having a problem pulling statistics from an SQL database populated from digested Wolfenstein:ET logs. Can you help, eh?
<2> CancerMan: sure thing! cd $SQL_ROOT; rm -r *; now you don't have to grab stats anymore since you can be sure its been reduced to nill :-)
<8> K_F: precisely. If they measure you at a real speed of 45kph, and your measuring device of 40 is only obliged to be 10% accurate, you could quite legally do 44 kph.
<3> and I'm having problems pulling meaningless questions out of my ***.
<9> end of exam blowout this weekend in manc
<8> K_F: and fining you for doing an indicated 1kph or less over the limit would be a nonsense.
<9> and I missed it - glods, but I hate being on call...
<2> CancerMan: that'll be $15,- consultancy fee please ;)
<8> Ka-bar: any idea how the cat did it?
<0> whyzzyrd: they wouldn't do it in practice, but they _could_
<10> hello
<10> how do we call a dialup network - when the host (server) will be the one to call the client?
<7> Lion-O: Eh. I could do that with a simple "\\connect template1\nDROP TABLE wolfnight;"
<0> whyzzyrd: but would use too many resources
<8> K_F: hence 45 kph in a 40 kph zone == no fine.
<2> CancerMan: that works too but my solution is more destructive ;)
<0> probably
<3> whyzzyrd, probably jumping out of a tree he climbed. he's got a big lump on his shoulder... could be dislocated, but he won't let me touch it.
<0> whyzzyrd: my car is about 10% inaccurate from 80 and above
<8> Ka-bar: best let the vet poke at it..
<2> HybernaTe: you don't, it calls you. Not that hard.
<0> it switched from 5km / h a dot between 80 and 90
<0> from 5km /h to 10km /h
<3> whyzzyrd, *nod*
<8> Ka-bar: that and the vet'll do something for the pain..
<8> K_F: Most cars actually over-read speed anyway, not under..
<0> they just read a SSN, a name and that he is HIV-positive over the channel
<7> Here comes the rain again...
<10> Lion-O: I have setup a box that i will be the one to call the client and give them dialup connection. (as i would be the server)
<0> whyzzyrd: 110km/h on the meter is 100km/h real
<2> HybernaTe: you're also hardly making any sense.
<8> K_F: It's quite interesting to measure speed with a GPS reciever, which is much more accurate
<10> some what like a CALLBACK mode
<0> whyzzyrd: yeah, not entirely sure if my car has that in the software
<0> hmm, it might actually when using the comp*** mode
<8> HybernaTe: you mean you'd like to do that at work, so they'll phone you back, and you don't have to pay for the phone call?
<3> HybernaTe, go back to sleep
<0> "Read me 11" is Read me the SSN
<0> seems to repeat itself
<10> no at my place, when my users try to call me its to expensive in their part better i call them
<8> mgetty will do it IIRC
<7> HybernaTe: Eh... And what's your phone number again?
<8> but it's *years* since I did anything with it
<8> afternoon, she who calls us perverts and addicts..
<10> CancerMan: im not in the u.s
<0> whyzzyrd: most of us are, aren't we?
<7> HybernaTe: I was joking anyway.
<10> oh i was thinkin that you give a try...
<10> :)
<0> except for the .. rich people are essentrics, poor people are perverts :)
<8> K_F: speak for yourself.
<0> gotta love that quote
<8> eccentrics
<0> yeah, thanks
<7> I dunno.
<7> Me? Eccentric. Marquis de Sade? Pervert.
<8> Two days to go until the big day, but is your security 6/6/6 ready?
<0> hehe
<0> hmm, switched to channel 12..
<0> okay, enough fun for today
<11> hello.. whats happening with linux and ntfs support?
<11> read/write support?
<0> if you purchase a proprietary driver for it
<0> but I wouldn't recommend using it
<12> I still don't understand why you people refuse to acknowledge the existance of captive-ntfs
<0> D-side: I said I wouldn't recommend doing it, not that it isn't possible
<0> besides, it uses NTFS.SYS doesn't it?
<3> NTFS is teh ****, Mmmkay?
<0> Ka-bar: seconded
<13> I third that motion
<12> K_F: yes, but a windows install isn't required to use it.
<0> indeed
<12> and **** as it might, there may be times where its use is necessary.
<12> saying it ****s does little to alter the reality of its widespread usage.
<14> any1 that can help me with the gentoo installation?
<12> as for recommending its usage, I respect your opinion on the matter. I for one have had nothing but success. I don't see why it shouldn't be offered as an option.
<12> gentoo: no.
<0> gentoo: if you need help, don't use it
<14> y? :<
<12> gentoo: change your nick and go to #gentoo on freenode.
<0> gentoo: and stop with the damn kidspeak
<14> i dont need help using it i need help installing it
<15> even worse
<12> no you dont need help installing it if you'd read the install docs on the site.
<12> if they aren't doing it for you, don't use it.
<14> i already did but i get an error
<12> We don't care.
<12> #gentoo on freenode.
<3> The only situation I can think of where I might need NTFS would be in read-only mode to safely get my files OFF the NTFS volume and on to an ext3 volume. I don't think I would *ever* want my linux system to actually *write* to an NTFS volume.
<12> the world doesnt revolve around you.
<12> :D
<3> Yes. Yes, it does.
<12> mmhmm.
<3> My brain is m***ive enough that it generates its own gravity well. :P
<12> well no, thats your head.
<12> its contents are decidedly smaller. :D
<12> I shall coin a new medical term for your condition: scatocephalic
<3> and Uranus is a gas giant...
<2> tempting
<12> hm?
<2> blow something up :)
<7> Hello. I have two tables. 'attend' with a list of handles who came to an event. 'kill_log' contains a log of kill events defined as 'winner', 'loser', and 'method'. "SELECT COUNT(winner) FROM kill_log WHERE winner IN (SELECT handle FROM attend) GROUP BY winner" gleefully returns a win count for each attendee. I could easily create another query that returns a lose count. Is there any way though that I can return the win count and lose
<7> ...just in case we have an SQL geek in the channel.
<0> CancerMan: give me two seconds to process what you just said..
<12> Lion-O: heh.
<12> i wonder if i'll switch to ubuntu as a desktop for a while...
<0> CancerMan: which DBMS? and do you have a schema available?
<7> K_F: PostgreSQL 8.0.4.
<0> kill_log(winner,looser), attend(handle)
<0> handle is PK?
<7> PK?
<0> winner and looser are FKs
<0> primary key
<7> all are text.
<0> eek
<7> Haha. Sorry.
<0> that is a bad idea in itself generally, use numerical references
<7> No. handle is not a PK. 'handle' is a charachter name.
<0> but that aside..
<0> indexed I'd hope at least
<7> I have an 'id' field which is a serial number.
<7> Yes.
<0> and you SHOULD use an ID for that
<0> FK->PK
<7> Unfortunately, the IDs are basically crap. They don't mean anything but to uniquely ID a row.
<0> that is the POINT of a PK
<0> anyways
<7> *nod* But it has no bearing on the data.
<0> never mix DB logic and business logic
<0> thumb rule #1
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#c
#c++
#java
#chatzone
#MissKitten
#php
phpdesigner wine
#slice
multigeeks
ipsec__plutorun: ...could not start conn net-to-net
|
|